Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Start a Coup to oust Tepper


Panthers Fan 69
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, Mage said:

The only hope is that Tepper eventually relinquishes control of operations.  Remains as the owner but has little to no say in anything that doesn't relate to the finances of the team.

I don't anticipate that to happen, but it could.  Attendance is going to be REAL bad this year.  

I don't feel like him relinquishing control will remove his stench.  Not changing till he sells.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Panthers Fan 69 said:

Looks like we found Tepper’s Alt

It's comical that you think starting a thread on an internet forum is the beginning a movement that ends in Tepper getting ousted.  We have a lot of cheeks threads, this one is high quality cheeks.  G'luck on your coup, lemme know when he's gone.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, PNW_PantherMan said:

Revenue sharing.  It doesn't matter.

This is our only hope. If the Panthers aren't generating enough revenue in merchandising, ticket sales, TV time, etc, it affects every owners bottom line. If he can suck bad enough, maybe, just maybe, they force him out. They're not going to want to share hundreds of millions of dollars with a guy that's bringing very little to the table. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Newtcase said:

It's comical that you think starting a thread on an internet forum is the beginning a movement that ends in Tepper getting ousted.  We have a lot of cheeks threads, this one is high quality cheeks.  G'luck on your coup, lemme know when he's gone.

Looks like we found Tepper’s wife’s account 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, LegioX said:

I hope every home game this season is full of opposing team fans. I hope there is not a single fan of ours in their seats.

I would prefer the stadium be empty rather than full of opposing fans myself. That would have a more lasting impact to Teppers ego.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Yep. I was hoping for and calling for a day three guy. But I didn’t research the position to say if we should or should‘t have jumped at a particular guy at a particular spot.    And everything I read said it was a poor draft for RBs depth wise. I guess when Seattle takes a backup RB in the 1st, that kind of backs that up.    I definitely think we should keep 4 running backs and if King can play well enough then keep him too.    I believe I heard Canales say we are a running team (talking about drafting a WR he will be needing to block as well as catch). Well if we are gonna be a running team by identity we don’t need to stock the WR room to overflowing. If one room has to sacrifice, it should not be the RB room given our circumstances. 
    • If there's a pattern I'm definitely picking up from Dan and company is a philosophy of making trades where we try not to sacrifice the number of draft picks we have by day's end. In other words, we're not giving up three picks for one, or giving up a future pick to make a pick today. And even if we give up something at the start, we make trades later to make up for that initial loss. Here's how it stacked up for 2026: How we started: 19, 51, 83, 119, 158, 159, 200 How we ended: 19, 49, 83, 129, 144, 151, 227 (no future picks sacrificed) Ultimately, we moved up two spots in the second to ensure we got someone we coveted, gave up a few spots for our fourth round pick, but then had better picks in the 5th (and got really good value out of them), and had a worse 7th rounder which isn't that big of a loss anyways.  At this point, we can question who they draft, but they're pretty good maneuvering across the draft board.
    • I just saw the funniest thing...or very disappointing, depending how you handle misery. A guy on YouTube did a 2027 'way too early' mock draft.  If I told you the simulator has the Panthers selecting in the top 10 , what would you say?  If I told you it was pick #8 and only two QBs were taken in the top 7, what would you say?  If I told you this dude had us taking a defensive player, what would you say?
×
×
  • Create New...