Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

After a rewatch of the game… is anyone weirdly confident about the future?


jb2288
 Share

Recommended Posts

53 minutes ago, PantherBoy95 said:

I appreciate this delusional optimism, because I absolutely do not want to go through what I went through yesterday all season. It is also embarrassing for NC, and I hate to see it represent the state.

So here's to seeing vast improvement, and some pride next week.

If they score 30+, we have a shot at not getting blown out again.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, TheBigKat said:

Any QB not named Daniel Jones / Bryce Young and we are competitive yesterday 

lol not a fuging chance, this is incredibly delusional. Mahomes maybe makes it a 2 score loss, any other QB and it’s still a 3+ score loss. Bryce had enough to make it 5 scores, and it would’ve been worse if the Aints didn’t take their foot off the gas pedal, but no QB makes this team competitive yesterday 

  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't think much differently than I thought last week. 

I knew what the issues really were and the only surprise I did not really foresee as a good possibility was the bad run defense. 

I'm resigned to Canales coaching with his Learner's Permit this season and hopefully he will be closer to ready after he processes what he fuged up his first year. 

And so on... it is down to hoping Young shows without a doubt, what he is. Whatever that is. We need certainty. 

I mean, the risk of missing out if he is really good and we release him or something, is a much slighter risk than keeping him and betting he is going to be really good.

So if he plays to form and does nothing really super encouraging in the next few weeks I don't care what they do with him as long as they replace him. Sooner the better.

 

Edited by strato
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, NAS said:

Tepper will can Canales (see what I did there), if he doesn't fix his boy Bryce.

Bryce does look like he's lost it mentally. His erroneous throws, jumpy feet, everything, he was a total deer in the headlights.  He's officially been David Carr'ed

I like to think Tepper has common sense and can see Bryce has completely lost it and nothing DC can do about that but I understand that’s putting a lot of faith in him 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, NAS said:

Tepper will can Canales (see what I did there), if he doesn't fix his boy Bryce.

Bryce does look like he's lost it mentally. His erroneous throws, jumpy feet, everything, he was a total deer in the headlights.  He's officially been David Carr'ed

Bryce never had it to lose, he was doing this same poo against any quality competition in college.  Go dig up his last game against LSU, it was a functional disaster and it looked just like yesterday.  Cool he beat up lesser opponents and built a false narrative on the juggernaut that is Alabama football.  He was the only QB in the Saban era to start a full season and not win a title.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

37 minutes ago, Panthercougar68 said:

Beane blows them out of the water and Gettleman was out of New York. You can’t base how someone is gonna be because who their boss was

Recency bias. For all of Hurney’s issues, he built two Super Bowl rosters.

Beane has yet to build one.

DM was 2nd in command and Fitts best friend. I don’t buy the narrative that Dan was disagreeing with Fitt’s every move.

The last few years were a collaborative effort and Dan was right in the mix.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • okay I found this and it sounds like my hopes for the first surgery being not such a great job seems like it could be actual reality.  I only hoped because that would give a better chance for recovery and ia a possible scenario so I just thought it could be possible. Had no real evidence of it. But I’ll be damned.    This is a detailed report of Brooks’ surgery and the condition of his knee after the failed repair.     https://x.com/jmthrivept/status/2055743129408704806?s= Sparked by some very good questions by @CoachspeakIndex, here’s some info on Jonathon Brooks: 1. Speculation that the first graft/ACLR by Dr. Cooper didn’t “take” or at least was too lax, leading to failure and re-tear. Brooks dealt with issues cutting, progressing in his rehab into the early stages of 2024 and then re-tore it late 2024, requiring a second ACLR in January 2025 (essentially revision). Notably, CAR prolonged Brooks’ rehab process through Sept-Oct due to issues progressing into the next stages of rehab. 2. Second surgery performed by Dr. Neal ElAttrache, who has extensive experience with revisions. He did a double bundle technique, harvesting graft from Brooks’ left patellar tendon and a strip of his right IT Band (his right patellar tendon had been utilized for the prior graft in 2023. The double bundle technique significantly increases rotational stability of the knee, leading to a stronger and more secure graft/reconstruction. Also to note, Brooks’ surgery wasn’t significantly delayed, meaning that the tunnels from his prior ACLR were in good shape and they didn’t need to perform bone grafts to fill in (would have delayed 2nd surgery by 5-6 months). Essentially, reading the tea leaves tells me that everything else except for the graft itself was still in good quality within his knee. Good sign for future.  3. Typically, you see a performance increase anywhere from 16-20 months post-revision. Brooks will be ~21 months out from his second surgery by the time Week 1 hits. His knee should be more stable and stronger this time around, with adequate time for healing and return to all movement patterns. I’m not viewing this situation as a typical “Player __ had TWO ACL tears, he’s cooked” situation. Rather, I’m viewing it as the first procedure failed, but the second procedure is significantly stronger and should allow him to return to form this time around. I don’t know why it posted as a link but there it is.  
    • Jackie, any more reps tomorrow, or is that it for this session?  thanks for the work
    • How can you say they aren’t trying to win now with all the moves made in free agency? Or is trading first round picks the only way to be win now? I’d be fine never trading another first round pick again, win now be damned.
×
×
  • Create New...