Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Bryce Young benched


Jackie Lee
 Share

Recommended Posts

2 hours ago, Hoenheim said:

Holy poo!!!

This is a huge sign that Canales has some balls to speak up to Tepper and tell him what it takes to win!! That's speaks volumes on how good of a coach he could be

I hope that you are right.  There is the possibility that Tepper told canales to bench boy wonder.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Lol I love how people "know" Canales stood up to Tepper and how a whole other group "knows" that Tepper told Canales to bench Young.  Maybe after two weeks worth of terrible play it was just a natural decision to bench the guy.   Maybe we can go get Malik Willis as some of you thought he was the next great player full of "potential"  

Edited by Barney
  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Thompcat said:

Do y'all think if Dalton does well that we will look for another veteran to sign as a backup?

We'll probably still lose, but I believe we'll be more competitive. I don't think signing another vet QB is wise considering we already have one. I think we should trade for a young QB sitting on the bench. I'm bias, but I would like for us to consider Rattler. Carr is doing very well with the Saints so he may be their starter for a while, so they may be more willing to trade Rattler.

I'm not too impressed with the QB draft class for next year. I would rather trade back our 1st round pick for more picks and go BPA. Continue with the rebuilding process, and if Rattler or whoever doesn't cut it, then hopefully Manning will be the guy in 2026. And Tepper has to back off with any decision making. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Barney said:

Lol I love how people "know" Canales stood up to Tepper and how a whole other group "knows" that Tepper told Canales to bench Young.  Maybe after two weeks worth of terrible play it was just a natural decision to bench the guy.   

Yeah my crazy theory is Canales, Morgan, and Tillis watched the film and read the locker room.  They saw a team giving up on a player and frustrated with his production.  Seems like a pretty easy decision from there...

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, ForJimmy said:

Yeah my crazy theory is Canales, Morgan, and Tillis watched the film and read the locker room.  They saw a team giving up on a player and frustrated with his production.  Seems like a pretty easy decision from there...

Maybe… but I think it’s more likely they saw my post yesterday and were like…W0w This guys a genius …let bench BY!

  • Beer 2
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

32 minutes ago, RJK said:

The idea that Bryce and those close to him consider his benching as “out of nowhere” tells me all I need to know about the mental makeup of that young man and those who raised him. Another entitled athlete bites the dust 

I mean, from the standpoint that his HC point blank addressed the topic to the masses yesterday that Bryce is their guy and starting vs the Raiders.....today was in fact out of nowhere. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I'm really not stressing about upgrading from Bryce. I'm frustrated with our inability (or refusal) to recognize overall bad QB performance and failure to seriously address the issue. QB is the most impactful position on the field, and we're not only settling for what we've been given to this point, but we've rewarded it with a fully guaranteed 5th year extension for a player that's never played 2 NFL franchise QB quality games back to back in 3 seasons. I can't understand how that's ok from a coach's or GM's viewpoint. Successful franchises don't do things like this. It just doesn't make sense.  We do not have a top half of the league QB right now. Since we don't have that player, we should be looking for him. Pickett isn't it. Grier isn't it. Bryce hasn't proven he is yet. Until you have that sure fire franchise QB, you keep looking. You're not consistently making the playoffs, a deep run, or a SB appearance without one.  What's the worst that could happen? We end up with 2 potential number 1 QBs? How horrible. 
    • Easy to understand Pickett, if this is anywhere close to on point. Canales wants to get as close to Bryce as he can- get the pace and timing in the throws as close a he can to Bryce. So the other players don’t have to adjust so much, to a new guy.       If Cam was the 1, he would look for a rocket arm.  But Bryce is the 1. Look for limited in the same way.  Low velocity, plenty of air under it, feels just like home when Picket comes in. And you have the guys on the second team not having such a radical adjustment (if they have to play) like with Dalton to Bryce.    Enter Grier. I guess we will collect those types.   
    • Best part is if we draft him, we can also use him as our fourth and one QB sneaker
×
×
  • Create New...