Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

At what point does the NFL competition committee speak with Tepper


TheBigKat
 Share

Recommended Posts

We’re going to be a decade in before we even possibly make the playoffs

 

 he’s nuked the local attendance

 he’s alienated local politicians

 he’s nuked the region TV viewership

 

overall Tepper has been a BAD NFL owner that’s dragging down the other 31 billionaires

 

 when does Roger pull him aside and make him hire a President of Football 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Poor team has nothing to do with the purpose of the Competition Commitee.

The league doesn't care if we aren't a good team. There have always been bad teams.

We are spending money on the roster. That's the only thing that there is a precedent for in regards to this.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

That literally doesn't happen.  Also if our GM is good you can turn any team around in a year or two.   I don't get these exaggerations about how we're automatically screwed for the next 5 or 10 years.  I'm not a fan of Morgan so far but it's in the hands of him and his scouts.  If we hit on wr this past draft (I don't think we did) then he potentially replaces dj Moore.  We are past the year with no first, and we got our second back from the rams.   It was an all time bad trade, but there is no reason at all to say we will still be awful in 2 years unless Morgan is bad, which I'm not ruling out  

  • Pie 7
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Tr3ach said:

That literally doesn't happen.  Also if our GM is good you can turn any team around in a year or two.   I don't get these exaggerations about how we're automatically screwed for the next 5 or 10 years.  I'm not a fan of Morgan so far but it's in the hands of him and his scouts.  If we hit on wr this past draft (I don't think we did) then he potentially replaces dj Moore.  We are past the year with no first, and we got our second back from the rams.   It was an all time bad trade, but there is no reason at all to say we will still be awful in 2 years unless Morgan is bad, which I'm not ruling out  

See Cal McNair 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, TheBigKat said:

We’re going to be a decade in before we even possibly make the playoffs

 

 he’s nuked the local attendance

 he’s alienated local politicians

 he’s nuked the region TV viewership

 

overall Tepper has been a BAD NFL owner that’s dragging down the other 31 billionaires

 

 when does Roger pull him aside and make him hire a President of Football 

laughing stocks have always existed in the NFL

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Most here were gung ho about trading up saying things like "If we miss it won't hurt that bad. Look at the 49ers.". It's like nobody actually considered the chance it wouldn't work becuase it was the beloved draft. (Which I think many like more than the game).

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, TheBigKat said:

We’re going to be a decade in before we even possibly make the playoffs

 

 he’s nuked the local attendance

 he’s alienated local politicians

 he’s nuked the region TV viewership

 

overall Tepper has been a BAD NFL owner that’s dragging down the other 31 billionaires

 

 when does Roger pull him aside and make him hire a President of Football 

 As soon as we stop gifting our Draft capital to everyone else.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We're the doormat of the league. There's always been a doormat. 

2 minutes ago, Tr3ach said:

That literally doesn't happen.  Also if our GM is good you can turn any team around in a year or two.   I don't get these exaggerations about how we're automatically screwed for the next 5 or 10 years.  I'm not a fan of Morgan so far but it's in the hands of him and his scouts.  If we hit on wr this past draft (I don't think we did) then he potentially replaces dj Moore.  We are past the year with no first, and we got our second back from the rams.   It was an all time bad trade, but there is no reason at all to say we will still be awful in 2 years unless Morgan is bad, which I'm not ruling out  

As a Panthers fan, you would have to be a slam fool to rule anything out in regards to the Tepper-run Panthers. 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I'm going to be real, the reason that vote ended up so lop-sided by the end was directly due to my programming. So there's nothing tongue in cheek about it. Also I left PFF after the Collinsworth acquisition (didn't want to move to Cincy) but have stayed involved in analytics via backdoor channels, but I can absolutely say that the experience was eye-opening, not because those guys are unquestionable football savants and that I became one by proxy, but because the amount of information that becomes available outside of what the typical fan has access to is revelatory and also really drives home how much context is still being missed even with all of that information. You don't discover that you know everything, you discover how much you still can't know no matter how hard you try, hence my point about the NFL not being able to figure out what makes a QB good. There's a lot of AI work going into that now and even that only seems to further confuse things vs. actually enlighten the problem. In the professional realm teams don't really talk about quarterbacks as A strictly being better than B, but how A can potentially perform better than B given a specific context of C. Of course those contexts may be wider for A than B, but there's also contexts where B can outshine A, even with lesser talent surrounding them. So what good teams strive to do is ultimately define a process of how they want their entire team to operate under schematically, find players that fit that scheme, and hopefully find a guy whose skillset will be maximized running that scheme with those players. Where bad teams fall of the wagon is constantly shifting those schemes and chasing bad fits or fads vs. sticking with a core identity and developing it.
    • there is a 100 mile long list of NFL players and coaches going to bat and defending horrible play from teammates.   
    • In 6 games, we've only had 6 hurries??? ... that can't be accurate
×
×
  • Create New...