Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Dalton Honeymoon Over


App Panther
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, App Panther said:

Welp, that was a fun 3 weeks. We'll always have the Raiders game and the high that ensued afterwards. Time to hear the stans all call for Bryce to be back next week.

Brian St. Pierre doing anything? Bust Young doesn't need to be out there ever again. The only *good* that will come from him is losing enough to get the #1 pick again. Dalton might still have a win or 2 in him.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, 45catfan said:

Dalton was not the main problem today.  Poor game planning, poor/no adjustments, shoddy defense and injuries.  Dalton didn't have a stellar day, but he is way down the list of reasons for today's failure.

That is very fair. I'm not trying to sound negative on Dalton, I do think he is washed at this point, and he didn't really elevate any of the team to overcome or mitigate some of those negatives either. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I feel like i'm seeing this a lot and while I agree this was obviously dalton's worse start the defense was the big problem today. Between that, drops and injuries along the offensive line we really didn't stand a chance no matter how well dalton played 

  • Pie 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, 45catfan said:

Dalton was not the main problem today.  Poor game planning, poor/no adjustments, shoddy defense and injuries.  Dalton didn't have a stellar day, but he is way down the list of reasons for today's failure.

Yeah, Dalton was alright, not great, not horrible. Huge list of bigger reasons why the Panthers lost.

Terrible gameplan and playcalling. Injuries. Drops. OLine letting untouched free rushers constantly. Abandoned the running game. Stupid procedural penalties that put them in bad down/distance.

And do we even need to talk about the defense FFS

  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, CPF4LIFE said:

If bryce steps back on that field I'm done this year and so is majority of the fanbase. 

Why anybody dense enough to think the overall fans and probably the players want to go back to last year and the first 2 games of this season is beyond me.

Lastly, there were never any insane expectations set on Dalton to act like it was some sort of honeymoon.  We weren't even a high school offense with bryce out there. The graph at the beginning of the game said it all. 

If y’all aren’t already done then you’re just hopeless fools. It’s a bad roster no matter the QB. 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, CPF4LIFE said:

If bryce steps back on that field I'm done this year and so is majority of the fanbase. 

Why anybody dense enough to think the overall fans and probably the players want to go back to last year and the first 2 games of this season is beyond me.

Lastly, there were never any insane expectations set on Dalton to act like it was some sort of honeymoon.  We weren't even a high school offense with bryce out there. The graph at the beginning of the game said it all. 

I have no idea how they justify putting Bust Young back on the field. Even in an injury situation. He should be #3 right now.

There was a tiny bit of expectations about Dalton after the Raiders game. The win felt good, so there's that, but there was a little bit of maybe they can win 6 or so more games. It wasn't just here though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Bad matchups, depleted defense, Bears defense is very good one.  Just an overall recipe for disaster.  We had a running game but fell behind and couldn't play catchup against one of the best pass-defense's in the league.  

The rookies didn't seem terrible for needing to carry the team.  I'll give them that.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I liked Sanders field reading abilities in general but his ceiling is fairly low and his shenanigans as a pro are, quite frankly, bizarre.  I don't think he is doing himself any favors by being a distraction while also being buried on the depth chart. Don't get me wrong, the media would attempt to make him a distraction regardless but it's not smart to feed into it when you aren't having a role at all. This can also be said of XL, BTW. We are no stranger to this. It's a lot easier to excuse Cam dressing like a deleted scene Harry Potter character at press conferences when he is looking like a man among boys on the football field. 
    • I hear Huddlers throwing things similar about Sanders whenever his name comes up, but to put it bluntly, we don't know that to be true. What we do know is that plenty of Browns fans thought that Sanders had the best camp out of the bunch, notwithstanding not being given the opportunity to play with the ones. What has been reported is that Dillon Gabriel is Stefanski's guy, and Andrew Berry thought that Sanders should be prioritized (even if it meant that he would eventually trade Sanders due to Sanders having more value). The fact that many Browns fans preferred (and prefer now) Sanders, and that there was a split---or difference of opinion between Stefanski and Berry, isn't really up for debate. It's true.  What this all means, at the end of the day, is that we don't know how Sanders compares to Hooker or anyone else because he really hasn't had an opportunity to play for whatever reasons. 
    • I don't think with a roster this bad we should be spamming picks at subpar QB's for development purposes. When the roster is a little more fleshed out, I would fully support that. Also, with our persistent evaluation problems, I can only imagine who we would have likely overdrafted in the past few years.
×
×
  • Create New...