Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Our rookie class on offense looks promising


NAS
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, NAS said:

Defenses are playing two deep safeties and taking away the passing chunk plays.  Teams have undervalued the running backs so much that I think teams have gotten too one dimensional and the teams that can run the ball will be more effective this year

It’s all cyclical, too big and slow?  Get smaller faster WRs and beat them deep.

Get small and quick on Defense?  Beef up the oline and run it right at them.

We’ll be back in the wishbone triple option soon.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, frankw said:

Ok drop it down to 220 yards per game and that is a top 20 QB. And if you think asking for that from your first overall pick is too much an ask then you don't have a QB.

spacer.png

Ok now show me the list of those QB's who did that in their SECOND year....don't worry I'll wait 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, BullCityP said:

Ok now show me the list of those QB's who did that in their SECOND year....don't worry I'll wait 

CJ Stroud in his second year and rookie Jayden Daniels are both chillin right there in the thick of that list. You might need to see an optometrist my guy.

Edited by frankw
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, tukafan21 said:

uh..... no.

I'm sure people will take this as me just pushing to draft T-Mac still, but it's not, we BADLY need a true outside #1 WR, whether it's my guy or someone else, it's a HUGE need, especially since we're not going to have an elite QB next year, we need to get the pass catching options to improve our QB play, no matter who that ends up being.

I love the potential of XL and even Coker, but if you would take your Panthers fandom goggles off for a moment and look at it objectively, our two leading returning WRs for next season hav 284 and 263 yards through 10 games.  

I don't care how good or bad the QB play is, that's a bottom 5 WR room in the NFL, if even that high.  Off the top of my head, the Browns, Patriots, and Raiders are the only teams with a worse WR situation going into next year as of right now (there could be others, but I haven't actually thought about it).

XL's ceiling is likely as a lower end #1, but that would make him an elite #2.  I've likened him more as the Waddle/Higgins than the Tyreek/Chase (in terms of role as the Robin to Batman, not style of play)

Coker, while we all think he can turn into something, is nowhere near good enough to go into next season as our #2 to XL's #1.  Realistically XL should be the #2 with Coker being the #3, and that still could be asking a lot from Coker at this point in his career.

In today's NFL, you're not going to win many games with below average QB play and XL/Coker as your top two WRs, it's nowhere near good enough to be competitive over the course of a season.

I still feel trading Diontae was the right call, but it does leave a hole. I like the promise of XL/Coker but I don't see either as the fast shifty guys that can get open underneath quickly and get a lot of YAC afterwards. There is promise that if we could get guys like Coker for basically nothing, then we can do the same next draft, so that we can use valuable draft capital elsewhere.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, outlaw4 said:

I still feel trading Diontae was the right call, but it does leave a hole. I like the promise of XL/Coker but I don't see either as the fast shifty guys that can get open underneath quickly and get a lot of YAC afterwards. There is promise that if we could get guys like Coker for basically nothing, then we can do the same next draft, so that we can use valuable draft capital elsewhere.

I wouldn't be surprised if his attitude doesn't show up at some point with his new team and direct us back to that discussion

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Mr. Scot said:

I wouldn't be surprised if his attitude doesn't show up at some point with his new team and direct us back to that discussion

Even if attitude isn't an issue, they better hope he can at least produce on the field soon. Funny enough, he gets a revenge game against the Steelers this week. 

I still think Diontae being here did provide some value in that, yes, someone like him adds value to this offense in terms of explosive plays. That needs replacing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Davidson Deac II said:

And in the case of the guy at the top, it took a long time for him to get to that point.  

Dig into his career numbers.

In his early days with the Jets his yards per pass attempt was 6.9

With Seattle his YPA is 7.4

He's always been pushing the ball downfield.

What changed more than anything with him is he improved his accuracy and decision making.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, outlaw4 said:

I still feel trading Diontae was the right call, but it does leave a hole. I like the promise of XL/Coker but I don't see either as the fast shifty guys that can get open underneath quickly and get a lot of YAC afterwards. There is promise that if we could get guys like Coker for basically nothing, then we can do the same next draft, so that we can use valuable draft capital elsewhere.

Trading Deontae was 100% the right call, as he's not a #1 either and we weren't going to re-sign him, but we still got an awful return for him (thankfully the Mingo trade made up for it).

And yes, we need that smaller shifty WR, but we also need a true outside #1 as neither XL or Coker are that.

That's why I think T-Mac is a perfect fit for us in the early 1st round as that outside #1, Coker and XL could both play on the other outside and in the slot, and find a small shifty WR to work from the slot too, with Sanders, Brooks, and now Hubbard with the extension, plus our OL, is an offense that can succeed with a good game manager type of QB and not need a superstar.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, tukafan21 said:

Trading Deontae was 100% the right call, as he's not a #1 either and we weren't going to re-sign him, but we still got an awful return for him (thankfully the Mingo trade made up for it).

And yes, we need that smaller shifty WR, but we also need a true outside #1 as neither XL or Coker are that.

That's why I think T-Mac is a perfect fit for us in the early 1st round as that outside #1, Coker and XL could both play on the other outside and in the slot, and find a small shifty WR to work from the slot too, with Sanders, Brooks, and now Hubbard with the extension, plus our OL, is an offense that can succeed with a good game manager type of QB and not need a superstar.

The problem with Tmac im almost certain he will go top 5 and I can't see either Jacksonville or New England passing him up.

 

I think in a perfect world we draft either Tmac or Hunter, but they interviewed Prime on Speak today and he said he will have a say in where Sanders and Hunter play. So I'm not even sure if Hunter is a option now lol.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • It seems the needs for the Panthers are at positions that tend to require intelligence to lift others--going from "good to great"--FS, ILB, and C--as you say. While i like Rodriguez a lot (can see the Hurricanes [Jarvis] and Panthers with a mustache player to get the fans into it)--I also like Golday (WLB?).  However, take a look at smallish Kyle Louis (Pitt).  He is known to be cerebral, but he is small (5'11" I think) and for that, I moved him lower.  But look at the different LB events at the combine--he is near the top in most of them.  I see him as a sleeper.  So if we wait until the second round, we can get a solid LB.   So what if we grab a free agent edge specialist (veteran) for pass situations and help develop Princely.  We draft FS (Oregon) first--maybe trading back to do so--I dunno.  We sign a free agent ILB and draft a rookie like Rodriguez or Louis.  In the third, we could probably find a center, like (former OT Parker from Duke) or Slaughter or Pew (may have to trade up).   So, as you say, others are fighting for Edge players, WRs, and OTs early like seagulls on the beach fighting over spilled corn chips, We sit back, grab intelligent players that make others better.  FS, ILB, and C. OT scares me more that Edge if we do this--but for those screaming for an edge--we have edge players--2 with starting experience who have had some degree of success.  JC Davis can play either T spot and he is good at pass blocking--a bit raw--but could be developmental depth that could play in a pinch. Or you could draft a solid OT with shorter arms that are driving them down into day 3--and convert them to G or C later.  Nijman and BC being re-signed could provide enough to hold down the job until a developmental OT (World, Oregon?) prepares for a shot at it.  Wagner (ND) could play LT but is probably a future RT--he is expected to be drafted early day 3.  My favorite day 3 OT sleeper?  Keagan Trost, Missouri. Great run blocker, soild pass blocker in SEC--just shorter arms.  Maybe a guard down the road, but for the time being, a T.  Not ideal, but at least you are building for the future.  
    • I'm not like most people in this thread in regards to Love. I'm not like most in regards to RBs either. I think certain ones will always be drafted in the first round because they are valued that highly. From an on-the-field perspective, they are as valued as ever; business-wise and contract-wise at times to re-up, that's where things can get tricky with valuation. That being said, Love oozes potential and makes higher-ups' mouths water. I know that he if somehow he is available at 19, he will be considered if not taken. You don't leave that type of talent on the board unless there is another compelling player of arguably equal or more value at another position of need that may have a higher priority (like maybe Sonny Styles). Now all that being said, I  don't realistically see either one of them being there at 19 according to the draftniks.
×
×
  • Create New...