Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

CBS Sports: Daniel Jones as a potential option for the Panthers to consider.


TheSpecialJuan
 Share

Recommended Posts

3 hours ago, mrcompletely11 said:

You are expecting people to simply throw out his past performance because you think he has the tools and was in a bad situation.  We get it.  Thats laughable and if my posting of his stats is insulting then put me on ignore.  His stats are his stats and that motherfuger has no business playing for this franchise.  We are past the point of reclamation projects.  And if you are not using past data as an indicator for future performance then there is simply no helping you

Your problem is you focus on the person making the comment more than the fact that an opinion is just that--to call someone names where there is no correct answer, as much as you don't understand that, is juvenile.  So if I explain how stocks that have terrible track records are purchased for pennies on the dollar--that is because the company has good fundamentals and is projected to grow if the sector indicators change.  That is science--and it is NOT based on prior performance.  I even said you do not put all your eggs in this basket--it is part of the process because it is low risk, high reward if it works out.  I will provide another example:  In Charlotte, they offered high performing teachers from South Charlotte a $20K bonus to transfer to the most challenging West Charlotte schools.  These high-performing teachers struggled--most retired or resigned--did they forget how to teach?.  Yet the teachers from West Charlotte Title I schools were dramatically improved in South Charlotte classrooms, most averaging increased test scores by over 50 points--unreal "growth."   The Giants are one of those challenging schools.  Jones is one of those teachers with low test scores who moves to South Charlotte to teach.  So my point was you cannot rely on the stats from a hostile, negative environment to evaluate quality.  Is Rogers changing the world in NY?  Hell no.  Did he suddenly suck?  This concept requires an understanding of social and emotional impact on player development.  Jones has the skills to be good.  I am sorry you have to simplify everything to understand it.  If we sign Jones on the cheap and he sucks and we cut him, what have we lost?  If he feeds off the better OL and Running game and reaches his potential, we win.  Low Risk, High Reward.  It is a business decision--not some psychotic defending a loser--which makes it easy for you to attack.  If you don't understand the discussions in the gray area, I guess you might attack the person with an opinion that reflects what other teams and players have done successfully.  Not my job to educate you.  Sue your public schools for malpractice because they did not teach you to think critically and objectively.

Edited by MHS831
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

47 minutes ago, MHS831 said:

Your problem is you focus on the person making the comment more than the fact that an opinion is just that--to call someone names where there is no correct answer, as much as you don't understand that, is juvenile.  So if I explain how stocks that have terrible track records are purchased for pennies on the dollar--that is because the company has good fundamentals and is projected to grow if the sector indicators change.  That is science--and it is NOT based on prior performance.  I even said you do not put all your eggs in this basket--it is part of the process because it is low risk, high reward if it works out.  I will provide another example:  In Charlotte, they offered high performing teachers from South Charlotte a $20K bonus to transfer to the most challenging West Charlotte schools.  These high-performing teachers struggled--most retired or resigned--did they forget how to teach?.  Yet the teachers from West Charlotte Title I schools were dramatically improved in South Charlotte classrooms, most averaging increased test scores by over 50 points--unreal "growth."   The Giants are one of those challenging schools.  Jones is one of those teachers with low test scores who moves to South Charlotte to teach.  So my point was you cannot rely on the stats from a hostile, negative environment to evaluate quality.  Is Rogers changing the world in NY?  Hell no.  Did he suddenly suck?  This concept requires an understanding of social and emotional impact on player development.  Jones has the skills to be good.  I am sorry you have to simplify everything to understand it.  If we sign Jones on the cheap and he sucks and we cut him, what have we lost?  If he feeds off the better OL and Running game and reaches his potential, we win.  Low Risk, High Reward.  It is a business decision--not some psychotic defending a loser--which makes it easy for you to attack.  If you don't understand the discussions in the gray area, I guess you might attack the person with an opinion that reflects what other teams and players have done successfully.  Not my job to educate you.  Sue your public schools for malpractice because they did not teach you to think critically and objectively.

Jesus h christ dude

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, travisura said:

This franchise has a pathological aversion to drafting/signing Clemson players. Never drafted one, and the signings are once in a blue moon, and they're never high profile guys.

But their fans simp for their players left and right. Regardless of how ill suited to the NFL they typically are.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Not sure if they are happy but realize they can’t upgrade everything this year and are content with the group
    • Bryce among the 7 players Mark Ross of NFL.com guarantees will get better this season. Today, I am identifying seven players who I guarantee will improve on their 2024 output in the 2025 season. Young took tremendous strides in 2024 after returning to the starting lineup in Week 8 following his benching. He looked far more comfortable in his return and produced with consistency, as he threw for 2,104 yards with 15 TDs and six INTs in the final 10 contests. Most important perhaps is Young's confidence grew immensely down the stretch, leading Carolina to either a game-tying or game-winning drive in six of those games. Now he enters his second season in Dave Canales' system with his best supporting cast to date. The Panthers drafted wide receiver Tetairoa McMillan eighth overall to pair with Adam Thielen and Xavier Legette, who I also believe is poised for a breakout campaign this fall. The 18th-ranked rushing attack from a year ago added Rico Dowdle to complement Chuba Hubbard, giving the team a pair of 1,000-yard rushers. The Panthers have taken the necessary steps to ensure Young's third season will be the best of his career, and now it's up to him to not only continue to grow as a player but prove why he was worthy of being taken No. 1 overall in 2023. I believe that's what he will do. https://www.nfl.com/news/which-nfl-players-will-improve-in-2025-c-j-stroud-deebo-samuel-among-guaranteed-risers  
    • While it's fair to question how impactful a player's relationship with a coach is (especially if someone has questions regarding said coach), it's important to also evaluate the difference between the players here. Jordan Fuller was pick #199 in the 6th round while Justin Simmons was #98 in the 3rd round. Jordan Fuller might have gotten a Super Bowl ring while he was with the Rams, but he got it while on the IR. Justin Simmons, on the other hand, is a x2 Pro-Bowler (2020, 2023), x4 second-team All-Pro (2019, 2021 - 2023), and was the NFL co-leader in INTs (2022). Simmons has also fallen off in the last couple of seasons though, grade-wise. He very well might not be that same player, which could be why the Falcons have elected to replace him with Fuller. As far as getting the best out of what he has, asking him to produce with a starting DL of A'Shawn Robinson (63.56% of the defense's snaps), LaBryan Ray (51.48%), and Shy Tuttle (50.08%) isn't reasonable. Wonnum only played in 8 games, but had the second most % of snaps (37.27%) at EDGE behind Clowney (53.53%). The second-string DL based on snap % was... and don't read this if you just ate... Charles Harris (34.48%), DeShawn Williams (27.67%), and Nick Thurman (19.7%). The second-string EDGEs based on snap count would be DJ Johnson (32.27%) and Cam Gill (18.14%). With the investments made in the run defense this season though, especially on the defensive line, it's more than fair to demand a complete turn around from last season.
×
×
  • Create New...