Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Forget about Bryce, Dave Canales is who we should be talking about.


Eazy-E
 Share

Recommended Posts

5 hours ago, Jon Snow said:

I'm not sold on him just yet. He abandons the run too quickly for my liking. 

That’s been my take for several weeks, however, this week I’ll give him a pass on it just knowing KC’s rush defense is so good.

The game plan was to pass the ball and they almost pulled it off with Bryce Young… wow.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, Eazy-E said:

The playcalling seems suspect at times because there are certain plays we literally cannot run because of the physical limitations of our QB. 

The offense looked completely different with Dalton under center but unfortunately he ran out of steam in like 2 games. There were plays he called that I’ve never seen ran for Bryce. Bryce just lacks that type of arm talent.

It looks like he created a completely new offense for Bryce now compared to what he was calling when Bryce started the season.

Let Dave pick his QB and let Bryce and the new guy battle it out in camp. It should have already happened this past offseason.
 

 

PLEASE show me the plays that Bryce couldn't throw. Lol you guys are acting like Andy was throwing 70 yard bombs out there!! 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, BullCityP said:

PLEASE show me the plays that Bryce couldn't throw. Lol you guys are acting like Andy was throwing 70 yard bombs out there!! 

I don't think it's necessary to succeed, but it's clear Bryce doesn't have the arm strength to really fit the ball into tight windows with arm alone 15-20 yards down field regularly. He can throw really well at that distance with anticipation, but he just lacks the same arm strength as some other notable high draft picks.

However, the question becomes - can he make up for that in other ways? He might be able to, because he played a very good KC D ( tho passing wise it is more middle of the pack - still a good D).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Canales deserves a lot of credit. I'm very pleased. He's definitely making strides with Bryce. I also think some of his lack of commitment to Bryce as the starter is to motivate Bryce. I think he liked what he saw when Bryce was benched. 

Even the Defense looks tremendously better with just a couple more pieces getting healthy. Wonnum has made our pass rush viable again. 

I would love to see this team with one more good player across the defensive front, DT or an edge rusher.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 hours ago, Eazy-E said:

He has been having to work within Bryce’s limitations, especially in the red zone, and doing about as good as he possibly can imo.

Limitations in the red zone? You mean the all rookie catchers? or the geriatric option AT? He would have hit JT Sanders (but he was injured by that point) on the seam for a Touchdown but he had a player there that wouldn't make any other professional roster just completely whiff a well placed ball at the end of the second qtr.

  • Pie 1
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, ImfromClayton said:

I also think some of his lack of commitment to Bryce as the starter is to motivate Bryce.

This here, I appreciate from him. I saw it as making him earn it, which no one had done. And they had needed to from day one. 

It was a definite risk on the job security front. The whole benching and whatever took balls or balls and mindset.  

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm encouraged with what I am seeing.

And also, I know people don't believe it, but the defense has been improved recently as well. Getting healthy has helped a ton. Don't get me wrong, they still aren't great, but they look better than the beginning of the season. Hell we had 5 sacks today, Wonnum has been a big boon to our pass rush.

We held the best offensive coach of the modern era to 10 points in the second half. Small victories and all, but that showed the ability to adapt and adjust as the game goes on. It was nice to see. I'm interested to see how the defense looks once we get the best player on our team back (Brown) and use our high draft pick on an edge or interior lineman to help the pass rush.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, strato said:

This here, I appreciate from him. I saw it as making him earn it, which no one had done. And they had needed to from day one. 

It was a definite risk on the job security front. The whole benching and whatever took balls or balls and mindset.  

It also shows to me that tepper isnt meddling like last year because Reich wanted to do the same thing and was overridden.  Thats a positive I would imagine

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

36 minutes ago, ImfromClayton said:

I know Evero isn't incredibly popular at the moment, but I really don't fault him for this season's poor defense. This defensive unit has been decimated with injuries. Since a couple of those guys have gotten back, they've been pretty solid. 

The defense played great yesterday. If Bryce’s one TD pass is enough to win the game, than the defense shutting down Mahomes in the fourth and keeping it close all day is the same. 

people are willing to throw all the other players in offense and defense, and even fans not showing up, under the bus to prop up Bryce. Yesterday was a team effort. 

Edited by electro's horse
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, electro's horse said:

The defense played great yesterday. If Bryce’s one TD pass is enough to win the game, than the defense shutting down Mahomes in the fourth and keeping it close all day is the same. 

people are willing to throw all the other players in offense and defense, and even fans not showing up, to prop up Bryce. Yesterday was a team effort. 

The D gave up 30 points. The D also let the QB run for 30+ yards that last drive giving them great field position. Great is not the correct term.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I've explained this in more detail before. Briefly, there's a process to quickly evaluate a QB. Also, there's a type of QB that excels at a higher rate than others at the pro level. After that, it's about keeping the QBs flowing through the system. 1st round QBs are not superior, they just get more reps and game time. You can find just as many competitive QBs that are 3rd day or undrafted if you give them the same reps and game time. Now, to dive deeper for fun. To understand this further, there are rare 1st round QB exceptions, but they must come with a pro pedigree and proven success in college. There's only 1 to 3 of these QBs every decade (John Elway 1983, Peyton Manning 1998, Eli Manning 2004, Andrew Luck 2012, Jared Goff 2016, Patrick Mahomes 2017, and Joe Burrow 2020. That's 1 of every 20 1st round QBs (5% of historical 1st round QBs in modern draft era). When you look at 1st rd QB success, eliminate these rare ones from your samples because they are trained to be championship QBs. 100% of them have taken their team to a championship. Also, the Bill Walsh tree knows the formula for building an offense and finding a QB QUICKLY. The question is why haven't others figured it out & continue to waste draft capital on QBs? Based on my QB evaluation system, here's the QBs I had slotted for the Panthers over the past 10 drafts. Patrick Mahomes, Brad Kaaya, Cooper Rush, Lamar Jackson, Brett Rypien, Tyler Huntley, Jalen Hurts, Shane Buechele, Desmond Ridder, Brock Purdy, Aqeel Glass, Jack Coan, Aidan O'Connell, Tanner McKee, Spencer Rattler, Devin Leary, Sam Hartman, Quinn Ewers. The ones in bold were the ones that rated the highest for pro championship qualities (probable franchise QBs). Obviously,  we didn't need them all, but it's about flow of pro championship qualities shown in college and not the most physically gifted. Also, there are a few QBs every decade who have the qualities, but never get a chance. If you're talent evaluation/QB system is good enough, you can go get 2 to 3 of them tomorrow to show what they can do when their name is called. I expect 1 of every 6 QBs to be worthy of being a franchise QB. There's strict rules to the depth chart qualifications, rotation, minimum KPIs and cuts/trades for me. Panthers have had Collins, Beuerlein, Weinke, Delhomme, Clausen, Newton, Bridgewater, Darnold, and Young. If you include Lewis, Peete, Allen and Mayfield, the Panthers have had 3 of 13 championship level franchise QBs. 1 of 5 (1 of 6 if you don't count Collins). It's the same for every franchise. The difference is a certain coaching tree knows how to move them through quicker than all the others while building defense with the most valuable draft picks. For Walsh, Montana(3rd rd) was his 3rd QB and Young(trade) was his 12th (9 yrs). He had a process allowing him to move through them rapidly. For Holmgren, Favre(trade) was his 4th QB and Hasselbeck(6th rd/trade) was his 15th QB (10 yrs). Neither of them settled on or tried to solve the problems of their 1st QB. For Andy Reid, McNabb(1st rd) was his 2nd QB and Mahomes(1st rd) was his 15th QB (19yrs). For John Harbaugh, Flacco(1st rd) was his 1st and Jackson(1st rd) was his 8th (11 yrs). For Sean McVay, Goff(1st rd) was his 1st and Stafford(trade) was his 5th (5yrs). Reid was the slow and stubborn one who wouldn't move on from his QB & had to wait nearly 2 decades to grab a QB that is the rare exception. I present this to show how 1st round picks are wasted on QBs, and it's the process fitting the QB to the system that generates success. Championship leader qualities and a process to move through QBs for a single coach's offense until you find a winner is the formula. The ages of these QBs from the Walsh tree when they won their first SB: Montana(25), Young(33), Favre(27), Mahomes(24), Flacco(27), and Stafford (33). Mahomes is the only sports pedigree QB exception on this list. QBs selected in the top 20 picks that weren't a pedigree QB were discarded by the team that drafted them. It will continue to be the same for the QB position as the dynamics of an offense from coach to field to team to clutch moments are not going to change. The combines/draft is just a media show that will only highlight the rare pedigree exceptions at QB for the NFL. You can line up ANY 12 QBs demonstrating success in college with the pro championship level qualities right now & you'll find a couple franchise QBs. Overrated arm strength & athleticism mean absolutely nothing for success at the pro level (that's a bonus). If they had enough of the tangibles to consistently succeed in college, it will translate to the pros. Currently, the Panthers are on QB #1 being shoved into Canales' system. Hooker is Canales' 4th QB (5th if you count Bryce Perkins). The Panthers only need to get Young out of the way and start giving these QBs a shot. If a GM can't fit a QB with the offensive coach in 6 QBs, then it's time to move to a new GM. For Canales' system, I'd go with Cooper Rush(trade), Tyler Huntley(available/ps), Desmond Ridder(available), Jack Coan(available), Aqeel Glass(available), Tanner McKee(trade), Sam Hartman(available/ps), Devin Leary(available), Hendon Hooker(on roster), Clayton Tune(available/ps), Chris Oladokun(available/ps), DJ Uiagalelei(available/ps) and Shane Buechele(available/ps). No particular order. This just demonstrates the winning process at QB to build a winning team. 7 of these QBs have been chosen by SB winning coaches. The point is to line them up and have one head coach with one offensive system move through them as quickly as possible until one of them holds on to the starting position with success and claims the franchise QB title. I expect the top 20 1st round picks for a franchise QB is the only way crowd to attack this and the Bill Walsh tree. Likely going to tell you that 6th round & later QBs as well as the Walsh tree are the sole outliers. We can count more 6th round and later championship QBs(13) than we can the 1st round pedigree QBs(7). As for the other 47 SB QBs, only 15 QBs have been drafted in the top 20 and led their first team to the SB. The best return is the pedigree 1st round QB, but this is rare. As for top 20 pick QBs that aren't pedigree, you're better off running 6th round and later QBs through the offensive system as quick as possible while spending that top 20 1st round pick on core defense or the rare dual threat skill position player. I don't expect the typical media driven fan to agree. I know SB winning coaches keep signing my college QB targets.
    • Best QB I've seen this year so far, with all due respect to Allen and Jackson.
    • What’s with the chargers run game?  They were good last year 
×
×
  • Create New...