Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

I know most of y'all want defense but currently at pick 4...


micnificent28
 Share

Recommended Posts

6 minutes ago, ProcessBlue2 said:

I think you go McMillan or Graham. 

McMillan is a giant receiver and it's been a long time since we had such a big target. Graham is a monster and I couldn't imagine him and Brown on the line together.

Kind of sad we can't get both. I think its hard to find a guy that can play 3, 4 and 5 tech, but at the same time its not easy finding a top WR talent, especially for us. Some teams are money drafting WR in round 2... we are not. Should we just say F it and take the top WR looking at us, or do we build this thang in the trenches? Tough decision but hopefully we look back two years from the draft and say they made the right one.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm on the D train.  Give me Carter in round 1 and round 2.  Team game.  D often makes the O good or bad.  We went O heavy last year. 

I wouldn't be shocked if 6'5 4.5 speed TMac comes into the NFL struggles separating.  We got of enough of that. 

 

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is not a popular take so flame away: the recent developments re Jonathan Brooks has yet again thrown the RB room in a state of flux, and that’s not good for a team that relies heavily on the running game. With a potential for another lost season in rehab if not longer, a blue chip prospect like Ashton Jeanty cannot and should not be off the table especially if he’s BPA. This guy is gonna be a beast with loads of potential. Bank on it. 

 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Davidson Deac II said:

The Lions have the best record in the NFC.  But you can probably insert the Chiefs, Rams, Patriots etc..  Chiefs had Tyreek Hill (fifth round pick) and the Rams had Kupp (3rd round pick), so neither of them spent high draft picks to get elite WR's.  The chiefs spent a first to get worthy, but he is certainly not elite as yet.  

St Brown was a 4th round pick.  So I am not sure he is a good argument to spend a top 10 pick on a wr.  

 

This doesn’t make sense. It doesn’t matter how you get the elite WR, you need one. We have proven time over time we can’t draft WR since DJ. So grab the best one in the draft and take your shot. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, CarolinaLivin said:

Kind of sad we can't get both. I think its hard to find a guy that can play 3, 4 and 5 tech, but at the same time its not easy finding a top WR talent, especially for us. Some teams are money drafting WR in round 2... we are not. Should we just say F it and take the top WR looking at us, or do we build this thang in the trenches? Tough decision but hopefully we look back two years from the draft and say they made the right one.

Neither FA market looks good either. I really hate a good CB like Will Johnson to get skipped over as well. Ultimately our weakest point is DL so I lean towards Graham.

Edited by ProcessBlue2
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Mage said:

I understand it is easier than saying his actual name, but my mind instantly goes to Tracy McGrady every time I read "TMac" on here.

LOL, you should be inside my head

McGrady was my favorite player for years, have a bunch of his shoes, jersey, all of it.

I'm also an Arizona alum who has seen every snap of McMillan's career....................

And I still screw up saying his first name after 3 years of watching him, and I also still can't not hear McGrady in my own head when I say T-Mac.

But it's a problem I'd LOVE to deal with for the next 10+ years as well, hahahaha.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, Davidson Deac II said:

The Lions have the best record in the NFC.  But you can probably insert the Chiefs, Rams, Patriots etc..  Chiefs had Tyreek Hill (fifth round pick) and the Rams had Kupp (3rd round pick), so neither of them spent high draft picks to get elite WR's.  The chiefs spent a first to get worthy, but he is certainly not elite as yet.  

St Brown was a 4th round pick.  So I am not sure he is a good argument to spend a top 10 pick on a wr.  

 

And the Patriots got Tom Brady at pick 199, why can't we just do the same thing?!?!?!

You realize how asinine it is by pointing out the mid round players who ended up as Top 5 players at their position is, right?

If every team could turn all their mid round picks into superstars, this would be an entirely different league and nobody would care who they take in the first round, because you're leaving every draft with a handful of new future stars.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm starting to think we will pick in the 8-12 range with the way the defense is playing. However, I'd love to get Hunter or McMillian. This team is dying for a big play weapon. I don't think you realize how having a Chase/Lamb type WR would open up things for Chuba and the running game.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • After listening to Morgan's presser twice, I came away with some key beliefs. First of all, I don't think he's a bullshitter. What you see is what you get. When he says something, he means it.  The Teppers really have evolved as owners. Morgan has mentioned how they're easy to work with--a pleasure to work with a few times now. There seems to be a good relationship between all of them (and include Dave Canales on that). We'll see if it lasts. Yes, no one wanted to come to Carolina with the previous management, but that seems to have changed. The team signed arguably the top Edge, LB and OT on the market, two of them on pretty good deals and one on what I'll say is "not a bad one." And, credit Sunshine Dave "Flowers and Cotton Candy" Canales for helping to change the culture. Morgan mentioned getting guys--and I'm paraphrasing--that are not only great football players but great people. Don't look for us to be acquiring any James Pearce types anytime soon, just saying. We'll see if that holds true in the future. Dan Morgan really has set up the Panthers to take the BPA/BAP. He mentioned it at least a couple of times, and he doesn't seem pressured to pinpoint a particular position. He just wants quality players that will help the team. This is how it's going to be (to your joy or dismay, probably for as long as he's here), and personally I love it. Many of us know how Morgan was when he played: aggressive! That's what he's going to be when making acquisitions. He explicitly said it, and emphasized it. All avenues are open (think FA, waivers...the draft)! Personally, as long as it's controlled aggression and not reckless aggression, I love it.  On KP: "Mobility is big in this league."  He basically says if another QB is the BPA while drafting--we're going by our board, people--we're going to add them.        ...  
    • Canes are so fascinating. Despite inconsistent defense and poor goalie play they keep winning. 
    • I like Morgan's approach but I'll wait for a few winning seasons before giving too much praise.
×
×
  • Create New...