Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Mcshay Unsure T-mac is a wr 1 or X..


micnificent28
 Share

Recommended Posts

11 hours ago, PappyMay said:

I completely agree. If we don’t resign Tremble I’m fine taking one in round 3 or 4 to lock the position down for 2-3 years but I’d be irritated if either of our first 2 rounders were spent on TE. To me would feel like a luxury pick like last year in the 2nd.

While I would take him, Pitts at #4 overall has underperformed.  Then Atlanta takes a good RB in the first and then a QB (whose value was inflated) just after signing Cousins--I can't imagine a worst draft performance over the past 5 years even though their picks did not bust--they were just stupid from the beginning.  Atlanta was supposed to win the South and they are struggling. 

We will go defense with the first two picks.  I have been picking WR in my mocks, but after looking into it more, there might be good players on the board, but they are not the best value.  A top 10 pick should be a difference maker.  I am not an Evero fan--I think he gets outcoached a lot (like vs. Dallas), so the biggest addition we could make is the DC--I actually like the depth at edge, DT, S, RB, and LB in this draft.  Not so much CB, WR, QB, or OL.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

54 minutes ago, MHS831 said:

While I would take him, Pitts at #4 overall has underperformed.  Then Atlanta takes a good RB in the first and then a QB (whose value was inflated) just after signing Cousins--I can't imagine a worst draft performance over the past 5 years even though their picks did not bust--they were just stupid from the beginning.  Atlanta was supposed to win the South and they are struggling. 

We will go defense with the first two picks.  I have been picking WR in my mocks, but after looking into it more, there might be good players on the board, but they are not the best value.  A top 10 pick should be a difference maker.  I am not an Evero fan--I think he gets outcoached a lot (like vs. Dallas), so the biggest addition we could make is the DC--I actually like the depth at edge, DT, S, RB, and LB in this draft.  Not so much CB, WR, QB, or OL.

I just think it will be hard for us to get a better DC. Will a DC really want to join Dave Canales? Do they trust Canales will be here past next season? Will teppers alleged new hands off approach last? I do think Tepper allows us to shell out the money to hire someone, but im just not sure about our ability to get a Saleh for example.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, MHS831 said:

While I would take him, Pitts at #4 overall has underperformed.  Then Atlanta takes a good RB in the first and then a QB (whose value was inflated) just after signing Cousins--I can't imagine a worst draft performance over the past 5 years even though their picks did not bust--they were just stupid from the beginning.  Atlanta was supposed to win the South and they are struggling. 

Bijan hasn't had the pop he was advertised to have either.  Not bad, but he was supposed to be a game changer.  Atlanta doesn't have that bad of an offensive line.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, Martin said:

I haven’t seen him play, but if he doesn’t get separation and he’s slow, that doesn’t sound like a top 5 WR

On his highlights he looks great at getting seperation against lesser programs then looks like a possession reciever against decent programs.  To me he looks slow and has a long stride.  We have plenty of that on the team we need a player who can get open quick and make people miss

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, jfra78 said:

On his highlights he looks great at getting seperation against lesser programs then looks like a possession reciever against decent programs.  To me he looks slow and has a long stride.  We have plenty of that on the team we need a player who can get open quick and make people miss

I agree.  I really don't like taking the same prospect archetype over and over.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • You would hope so. I’m confused why the sports world seems split on Bryce when he’s obviously not working out. 
    • So let’s do the reverse? Make everyone agree everything he does is a disaster? I also think the whole “gaslighting” is on the eye of the beholder. It went from he can’t avoid one single sack countered with he actually did that well Sunday (with data backing it) to a little breakdown of why he is so bad. People are going to have different opinions. I’m also not going to pretend this wasn’t happening Day one with this little QB. 
    • All this great stuff he has done, how often does he do it?  I have it at three or four games out of 14 where he was very good and then you get a drive here or a series there where there are some good things. Here is the gaslight part: everyone has put him on a curve with his first year the baseline, neglecting to understand how bad he was then. Even if he comes back twice as good, where does that really leave him? 25th ranked or thereabouts.     He had so far to go, and still does, it is a Major ‘settle’ to accept his play as worthy of giving him our future.  You want to settle when the Bucs have Mayfield, and the Saints have overtaken us at QB? We will be third in the division at QB. That is good enough for y’all?  
×
×
  • Create New...