Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Evero will return as DC


jamos14
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, jamos14 said:

Just letting him get "his guys" doesn't work.

Agreed. I'm all for getting him as much help as we can but based on his past recommendations, he should have no say in what personal we target. 

Nick Scott, Jordan fuller, DJ Johnson, Jamie Robinson, Troy Hill, A'Shawn Robinson, Josey Jewell, DeShawn Williams. All guys we brought in cause of Evero and the only decent guys being Robinson and Jewell. He has shown in Denver and last year here that he can run a good defense when the talent is in place but he's an awful scout. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think this is Canales saying they believe the issue with the Defense was a talent issue, not a coaching issue. I’d expect a huge turnover and a heavy defense driven draft this year. 
 

we also need to continue to build depth on the Oline and see if we can get a game breaking WR like Higgins but other than that, there isn’t much more that we can do for this offense right now. Have to let Sanders, Coker and Leggett develop and that will help us more than anyone besides Higgins may do for the offense.

  • Pie 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, jamos14 said:

He hand picked Woods and Fuller.  Both suck.

 

But yes, safety room needs major attention.      I'm honestly not sure where we are the worst at S, DE, or LB.  All 3 are huge holes.

If we’re sitting at 8 and T-Mac, Graham, and Johnson are all gone then Starks needs to be in consideration for the pick.

Safety’s rarely go top 10 but Starks is deserving in this draft and he’s the best safety to come out since Kyle Hamilton.

Drafting a safety high is also a relatively safe pick (no pun intended). The top safety’s in the league are all first or second round picks and the hit rate is pretty good.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, jamos14 said:

He hand picked Woods and Fuller.  Both suck.

 

But yes, safety room needs major attention.      I'm honestly not sure where we are the worst at S, DE, or LB.  All 3 are huge holes.

I don't think he "hand picked" them as much as they just tried to get affordable talent familiar with him. They were hoping that they'd be elevated by the system again, but low and behold we're running a bunch of soft cover three zone to deal with the talent deficit that ended up being somehow worse than anticipated.

I can also see the team not looking to invest heavily in EE's guys without knowing whether or not he'd be back. Now that there's direction there, they can go all in. Considering that he's had to work with scraps the last couple of seasons, it's an exciting change to me. 😄

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, Hugo said:

There is no DC that would even field a top 25 defense with a starting 11 including players such as LaBryan Ray, Shy Tuttle, A'Shawn Robinson, Jacoby Windmon, Josey Jewell, Jordan Fuller. 

Evero was considered a top 5 DC before the season. Canales made the right call.

Several of those players he brought in, and a handful he pushed out.

We lost Luvu, Chinn, Jackson and Burns. We brought in several of his former players.

  • Pie 1
  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dan Morgan should pick every defensive player he wants in this upcoming draft. Then they should tell EE to go ahead and orchestrate his defense according to the players we drafted him we need to get the players that we want for this team because there’s no insurance that EE is going to be with us long-term.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I would say that he's pulling things out of his ass to get people to visit his site.
    • Yep. I was hoping for and calling for a day three guy. But I didn’t research the position to say if we should or should‘t have jumped at a particular guy at a particular spot.    And everything I read said it was a poor draft for RBs depth wise. I guess when Seattle takes a backup RB in the 1st, that kind of backs that up.    I definitely think we should keep 4 running backs and if King can play well enough then keep him too.    I believe I heard Canales say we are a running team (talking about drafting a WR he will be needing to block as well as catch). Well if we are gonna be a running team by identity we don’t need to stock the WR room to overflowing. If one room has to sacrifice, it should not be the RB room given our circumstances. 
    • If there's a pattern I'm definitely picking up from Dan and company is a philosophy of making trades where we try not to sacrifice the number of draft picks we have by day's end. In other words, we're not giving up three picks for one, or giving up a future pick to make a pick today. And even if we give up something at the start, we make trades later to make up for that initial loss. Here's how it stacked up for 2026: How we started: 19, 51, 83, 119, 158, 159, 200 How we ended: 19, 49, 83, 129, 144, 151, 227 (no future picks sacrificed) Ultimately, we moved up two spots in the second to ensure we got someone we coveted, gave up a few spots for our fourth round pick, but then had better picks in the 5th (and got really good value out of them), and had a worse 7th rounder which isn't that big of a loss anyways.  At this point, we can question who they draft, but they're pretty good maneuvering across the draft board.
×
×
  • Create New...