Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Garrett Wilson eyeing Bryce Young


Recommended Posts

14 minutes ago, jb2288 said:

This is why the tanking discussion is so fuggin dumb. Other NFL players aren’t message board losers like we are they want to see winning. They could care less if we pick 6 or 8. Going out with a huge splash this season is massive for us going into the offseason 

I highly doubt our 5 wins are the reason for interest in us. Improvement in bryce and a staff bringing hope/consistency was always going to be the reason.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, CarolinaLivin said:

I highly doubt our 5 wins are the reason for interest in us. Improvement in bryce and a staff bringing hope/consistency was always going to be the reason.

Improvement in Bryce = winning

you aren’t losing many games when your QB goes for 5 TDs, even with our defense. 

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, Luciu5 said:

What does "He is" even mean and how is it related to the Panthers? Is he replying to something and I can't see it cause I'm not logged into X?

The op said, “maybe Bryce is better than we thought.” Wilson replied, “he is”

  • Pie 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

41 minutes ago, jb2288 said:

This is why the tanking discussion is so fuggin dumb. Other NFL players aren’t message board losers like we are they want to see winning. They could care less if we pick 6 or 8. Going out with a huge splash this season is massive for us going into the offseason 

It's almost like you can't grasp that Bryce and we as a team could play better and still lose. That was the story of most of the second half of the season. We just fuged up and actually won two of them.

No one would feel a bit differently if the Falcons had won the toss and gone down the field and scored in OT like we did. Because that was the bottom line. That game was essentially decided by the OT coin toss the way both teams were scoring at will.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • The draft isn't a vending machine where you insert a pick, press A3, and out pops a franchise cornerstone. It’s more like a gacha game - you turn in a premium (or non-premium) ticket, hear the fun little jingle, and wait to see what you pulled... without knowing how strong it'll actually end up. League-wide, the average draft hits on about 30 - 40% of its picks when teams have a standard seven selections. So if you walk away with 3 - 4 real contributors... that's considered a solid class. Hitting on 4 out of 11 is right in that range. To be clear: this isn't some veiled endorsement of Tepper, Fitterer, or Rhule. It’s simply an honest accounting of which players from that class are still with the Panthers and heading into their fourth year - and thus outlasting the average NFL career. Just trying to lean more toward more critiquing with clarity, not just lighting it all on fire for the spectacle of the flames.
    • Please do not forget that everything the NFL does is for the increase in revenue. If a big market team draws more money [ticket sales, betting revenue, TV ratings & etc.] when they play at home versus on the road in the playoffs, you can safely be sure the NFL knows & will act accordingly. Just like the draft lottery proposal, if the NFL can capture TV ratings for it, they will.
    • For a WR, 6'4" 220 would be decent size--if you hit the 235 range, I imagine that it costs you speed. I think his speed was an issue. He ran a 4.48 at his pro day. At the combine, he weighed in at 219 (NFL.com).   Mike Evans weighed 225 as a rookie and is also 6'4".  He ran a 4.53 40.  My main and only concern about TMac is between his ears--and it could be nothing.  He seems a bit silly, and it seems that he is in celebration mode when I want him to be in "let's get to work" mode.  Again, some people are just like that, but when they put the helmet on, they get focused.  I want to see that "dawg" before I get overly excited.  The pick is growing on me, and if you broaden the scope to consider what was available in free agency and the draft, it makes sense.  I don't think we got lesser Edge rushers in the second and third rounds, frankly, than what we could have gotten in the first.
×
×
  • Create New...