Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

NFL Playoffs


Jackie Lee
 Share

Recommended Posts

The Texans might be the worst double digit win team I've ever seen. Hell, the Chargers might be the second worse.

The NFL this year was just the haves and have nots. There were so many truly terrible teams that there were a few mediocre teams who have records better than they should in a normal year. You have a handful of really good teams, a bunch of abysmal teams and then the rest in the middle who have records that look better than they are as a result of the overall league situation.

"I forgot the Steelers have 10 wins too. They're up there too. LOL 

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Mother Grabber said:

where the Stroud stans? 1/2 for 7 yards is a heck of a half of football quarterbacking.

Like I said, the Texans as a team just are not good. I don't think anyone is watching this game saying "damn, the Texans have a QB problem". We don't have to do this stuff just because Bryce is playing better.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Mother Grabber said:

where the Stroud stans? 1/2 for 7 yards is a heck of a half of football quarterbacking.

I mean. By definition the Texans are what they've always been. When Stroud was drafted by Houston the overwhelming majority of people talking about that franchise agreed they were not remotely close to contending. They were one inexplicable play away from the first overall pick for a reason. I guess if it makes people feel better they can take solace in Stroud not doing well but I would caution throwing stones from a glass house given we are waiting to see our own guy put together a complete season of minimum adequate to good QB play let alone top 10.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, mrcompletely11 said:

Lol someone clearly is just watching stats.   Texans have 4 plays on offense.  Chargers are doing a ground and pound

Now you see how dumb some of you sound when you talk about Young’s passing yards despite our defense not being able to get off the field 

People were even talking about Young’s passing yards while he led 3 straight touchdown drives to start the game against Arizona 

  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • We could quibble about was that an answer to what I asked but I  don’t see it as being one. Look, he agreed to this Evero thing. Up front. Apparently anyway. Took the job with those conditions in place. I buy that and will work off of it.  This play calling issue isn’t the same thing. I am not in the mood to delve into Canales’ shortcomings and get out the pitchforks at the moment. I will abstain from that topic and stick to the quandary the dissenters who want to usurp his play calling power, find themselves in. As far as that goes I am still on the fence and think the play calling is Bryce centric and the play selection/playbook is affected. That does not mean I know that if the playbook was open he would be great play caller. Just that he is hampered right now.  Inserting an OC not of Canales’ approval changes the original parameters of the assumed agreement.  Unless you think Tepper placed a contractual prescription to allow Tepper to dictate that he can insert a play caller of his choosing after a time period if he is not satisfied with Canales’ work.  Which, do you really think that is in play?  I do not.    Unless it is, Canales has the option to yea or nay. As I said, it could be forced on him. But they only do that if they want him out.  And as of now his stock is up, I would have to say I don’t own any but I think it is up. He had the stadium rocking, the team in the playoffs, and has that sorry lil draft pick trending upward. Even at this very low rate.  I think he has ‘hand’ right now as they say on Seinfeld. This is something that may get play in the 2026 season, not now. IMO.     
    • Canes now have 19 losses on the year. Here is the truly alarming stat. 13 of those were multiple goal loses. 9 of those were 3 goal plus losses. This team is getting blown out more than any other year under Rod.     why?  Blue line is a total mess. It’s just no good with their combinations.  It pains me to say this, but they were mikes better with Burns and Orlov. They need Slavin so bad.  Health.  Size. The team is too small and has no physical play. Most forwards do not forecheck.  Worst under Rod.  Goalie play. Pretty average to sub par. PK is downright bad. It’s allowing a little over a goal a game. Worst under Rod.    Team will not win a playoff round under its current group of players. It’s not constructed to do so against heavy teams.      solutions.  Must get physical size by the trade deadline. Rod and Tulsky know this. That probably has to come with the 2C.  KKs size but a better scorer and meaner.  The need another physical winger.  Goalie. Either go all in on a top guy on a bad team or get average. Lastly, better defense. Need a Right shot heavy defenseman.  Yes that could mean someone’s favorite dman could sit. Looking at you Boom.    thats 3-4 new guys that must be brought in for them to have a chance at a cup.  And it’s all players that are different and better than what they have.  They have the cap. KK is gone. Add 4 mill back.    And then hope it’s jells unlike Mikko.  
×
×
  • Create New...