Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

NFL Playoffs


 Share

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, Hoenheim said:

fug this horseshit man. I am sick of having the Chiefs cock stuffed down my throat every year. The media  is going to be sucking their cock for 2 weeks straight.

blame the rest of the teams in the league for being unable to beat them, Tepper and company type clownshows included.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, KillerKat said:

you can also take away 3 from Brady for knowing defense`s signals.

that and while you can't take them away he had 2 others absolutely handed to him by not giving Marshawn the ball and Falcons 28-3 choke

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

He is quickly making a case for GOAT. If he wins this year, it will be interesting to see the rest of the career arc. How many does he get? Does Reid stick around? Does he win them elsewhere(like Brady)?

 

If KC wins it, I think he already deserves the GOAT title, even with everything Brady did.  At that point, Mahomes could lose it back to Brady if the rest of his career tanks, and by tanks I mean never even getting back to the SB again.

But if he wins 4 in 7 years, plus another SB loss, and is the only to ever 3-Peat, to me, that's more impressive than Brady getting 7 in 10 appearances over a 22 season career (removing both of their rookie seasons when neither played)

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, tukafan21 said:

I'm being intentionally obtuse and then you go on to say these things?

You're literally arguing that if neither ref can actually see the ball, that the ref who can see his face has a better view of where the ball is than the one who can see his back.  That's absolute utter nonsense, you either can see the ball or you can't, if you can't, then seeing someone's face or their back has zero bearing on anything.

And go watch the replay the one ref didn't overrule the other, he was the first one handed the ball and he placed it, at that point it would have then needed the other ref to overrule him.  Because I was specifically watching for the ball placement as I did see the refs coming in at different spots, so I'm quite sure that's how it played out.

I’ve never bought into your argument that neither ref could see the ball. Moot point now, but there is no way the guy with a view of Allen’s back should have been the one to spot the ball in that instance, especially given the fact that the other ref had a different spot. They should have come together to discuss the difference. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • No, the casual fan gets sucked into THIS^^^ kind of thinking, and it's so woefully incorrect that it's almost sad. The first is what I've said numerous times, NOTHING about non guaranteed contracts save the billionaire owners a single penny, because they still have to spend their cap floor, and the only reason teams ever don't spend the full limit, is to then roll it over into the next season to be able to spend more that year. But in the end, owners pay the same amount of money no matter what. The reverse is also the same, that the players in totality make the same amount of money as well, because in your example of Clowney not getting that money this year, it will go to another player, as the cap needs to be spent. And you say how we just cut Clowney after we gave him the 2 year contract, but everyone including Clowney's agent and himself, knew when it was signed, that it was more likely to be a 1 year contract than a 2 with how it was structured.  The 2nd year was just to be able to spread out the cap hit and he was always most likely going to end up getting traded or cut. It's why agents and players don't care about the total money in a contract, it's always and only been about the guaranteed money, as the years and overall value are meaningless, always have been, always will be.
    • Agents will have their 1st round picks hold out until the pay structure of their contract is to their liking, not how much money they'll get or even how much is guaranteed, just the when/how they will get the money over the course of the contract. If they're willing to recommend those players hold our, do you really think they won't do it for 2nd rounders to guarantee them an extra 10% of their entire rookie contract?
    • If BY continues to develop.  XL learns how to catch with his speed. Tet lives up to his hype... THEN Brooks comes back.. dammmmmmmmmmmmmm
×
×
  • Create New...