Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

NFL Playoffs

Jackie Lee

By Jackie Lee,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

t96 Grand Master

t96

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, Hoenheim said:

fug this horseshit man. I am sick of having the Chiefs cock stuffed down my throat every year. The media  is going to be sucking their cock for 2 weeks straight.

blame the rest of the teams in the league for being unable to beat them, Tepper and company type clownshows included.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
t96 Grand Master

t96

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, KillerKat said:

you can also take away 3 from Brady for knowing defense`s signals.

that and while you can't take them away he had 2 others absolutely handed to him by not giving Marshawn the ball and Falcons 28-3 choke

Link to comment
Share on other sites
tukafan21 Grand Master

tukafan21

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

He is quickly making a case for GOAT. If he wins this year, it will be interesting to see the rest of the career arc. How many does he get? Does Reid stick around? Does he win them elsewhere(like Brady)?

 

If KC wins it, I think he already deserves the GOAT title, even with everything Brady did.  At that point, Mahomes could lose it back to Brady if the rest of his career tanks, and by tanks I mean never even getting back to the SB again.

But if he wins 4 in 7 years, plus another SB loss, and is the only to ever 3-Peat, to me, that's more impressive than Brady getting 7 in 10 appearances over a 22 season career (removing both of their rookie seasons when neither played)

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Bama Panther Mentor

Bama Panther

Posted
Posted
3 minutes ago, tukafan21 said:

I'm being intentionally obtuse and then you go on to say these things?

You're literally arguing that if neither ref can actually see the ball, that the ref who can see his face has a better view of where the ball is than the one who can see his back.  That's absolute utter nonsense, you either can see the ball or you can't, if you can't, then seeing someone's face or their back has zero bearing on anything.

And go watch the replay the one ref didn't overrule the other, he was the first one handed the ball and he placed it, at that point it would have then needed the other ref to overrule him.  Because I was specifically watching for the ball placement as I did see the refs coming in at different spots, so I'm quite sure that's how it played out.

I’ve never bought into your argument that neither ref could see the ball. Moot point now, but there is no way the guy with a view of Allen’s back should have been the one to spot the ball in that instance, especially given the fact that the other ref had a different spot. They should have come together to discuss the difference. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • TD alt
      Leave our mark.

      By TD alt · Posted

      Some of you act like one can't learn from experience over time. Just because you may not know what you're doing in 2018 doesn't mean that you don't know what you're doing in 2025. Frankly, you grow from experience, and success and excellence gives first-time applicants the hand probably 99.999% of the time.
    • frankw
      Delete this franchise

      By frankw · Posted

      It's an interesting topic of conversation as sports evolves. I think ultimately it would lead to a number of small market franchises folding though. Especially in the NBA where there are so many bad teams that have been bad for years and years in some cases already. But as it stands I think athlete pay draft or no draft aside has reached a point where we can and should realistically ask should they make that much compared to the average person. Now college athletes is a different conversation but even that reaches a breaking point. But we could go down the rabbit hole on this even further into overall entertainment and talk about actors making absurd sums too. In the end I think in sports the powers that be won't allow these changes to even be considered because it opens the door for so many other variables. But who knows how long sports like football will realistically be around after people like us pass on. We're only just now learning about things like CTE which the league and the sport in general will only be able to run away from for so long. As far as the NBA goes my understanding is viewership has been steadily going down for a number of reasons but one crucial aspect is key players missing so many games. The NBA has to figure that out regardless. Especially when considering fans who pay to see these athletes compete in person. But hey I guess let's just try to appreciate what we've got while it still exists in this form eh?
    • PanthersNCSU
      Delete this franchise

      By PanthersNCSU · Posted

      I can't see a world where the money goes down, but maybe your lottery odds are now your contract numbers you can offer.  Thunder? You can offer Flagg 4 years, 20 million.  Hornets? You can offer Flagg 4 years, 80 million.  Some form of a system where the money is still there, but so is the freedom of choice (on top of bad teams getting *some* competitive advantage to signing them). 
×
×
  • Create New...