Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

NFL Playoffs


 Share

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, Candler Cat said:

From the live TV angle it looked like he got it

I don't remember the live tv angle off the top of my head, but I do remember my first reaction was that he didn't get it live, then on replay I thought he did, but also didn't see conclusive evidence of it, just that it was my opinion that he got it.

All I've been arguing here is that I don't think it was anything shady or one ref overruling another, I specifically watched the refs running in on different spots and was wondering who would get it, the ball was handed to the ref who cam in short first, he placed it.

Disagree with how it played out, but in the end, if any argument of "overruling" someone else could be made, it would have meant the one who came in with a 1st down mark would have needed to overrule the other.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Bills have to seriously shake something up unless they want to keep being the bridesmaids of the AFC. The Chiefs just have their number and are DEEP inside their heads at this point.

It really felt like they played scared tonight. The offensive play calling was very conservative, especially in 1st and 2nd down.

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, LinvilleGorge said:

The Bills have to seriously shake something up unless they want to keep being the bridesmaids of the AFC. The Chiefs just have their number and are DEEP inside their heads at this point.

It really felt like they played scared tonight. The offensive play calling was very conservative, especially in 1st and 2nd down.

Trying hard not to lose 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would consider firing McDermott. He’s a great coach, but everyone has a ceiling and the AFC Championship may be his. Yes you risk bringing in someone who is worse, but you have some success now it’s time to win it all. 
Problem is it is too late in the coaching cycle for the best picks. 

Everyone in their momma say Playaction boot after playaction boot and still you couldn’t stop it. SMH.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, emhoward said:

I would consider firing McDermott. He’s a great coach, but everyone has a ceiling and the AFC Championship may be his. Yes you risk bringing in someone who is worse, but you have some success now it’s time to win it all. 
Problem is it is too late in the coaching cycle for the best picks. 

Everyone in their momma say Playaction boot after playaction boot and still you couldn’t stop it. SMH.

It’s very akin to a “Dungy in Tampa” or “Marvin Lewis in Cincinnati” situation. Those Bucs and Bengals teams could get to the playoffs but just never could break through. 

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Um, no, just no. Bills, Chiefs, Chargers, Ravens, Bengals, Texans, Eagles, Commanders are 8 teams that it's not even a debate, they aren't trading their QB for Purdy. Patriots, Broncos, Titans, Giants, Bears, Vikings, Falcons are 7 more teams with QBs drafted in the last 2 years that also would rather stick with them than trade for Purdy as they all have more upside than he does. Lions, Packers, Cowboys, Bucs are 4 more that would likely keep their QB's as well, age aside for Goff, Dak, and Baker. Panthers and Colts are two teams in the same situation, QB's who have both struggled and shown flashes to where the teams probably stick with them because they drafted them, but in a re-draft of all QB's, they probably take Purdy over the guy they currently have. Jags, Cardinals, Dolphins, are 3 more with QB's who probably have a higher upside than Purdy but come with their own question marks, so debatable if they'd take Purdy over who they already have. That leaves Jets, Raiders, Steelers, Browns, Saints, Seahawks, and Rams. Rams would take him over Stafford for the future of course, but not for 2025, and I'd think the Seahawks would take him over Darnold, but honestly not sure if they would take him over Milroe at this moment as they really like his potential and have him for 4 years really cheap. That leaves 5 teams that I see who would absolutely take him over their current situation right now, and a handful of others who MIGHT take him over their current guy, a far cry from your 20.  
    • Agreed. Also as soon as they received the top pick in the next draft it was over. Bears won that trade. Gave up a top overall pick got one the next year plus pick 9, a couple 2nds, and DJ Moore a proven young WR. Had their 2024 pick from us be in the late teens or later it would be more debatable IMO. 
    • Option A:  Pay your starting QB starting QB money. Option B:  Look for a starting QB for 4-10 years (or longer) while wasting the talent at every other position.    How many of the top 20 QB's do you think are worth what they are being paid?   When you factor in the last year of his present deal his contract is really an average of 45 million per year which in today's QB market is a very, very good deal. I wish we'd had found a Brock Purdy to pay 50+ million a year right after we parted ways with Cam.  Ya'll go ahead and live in fairy tale land where good to great (much less elite) QB's are available to pay. Just the fact that they had the chance to pay Brock after the disaster of trading up for Lance is a testament that when you find a quarter back you can win with, complete in the playoffs and superbowls with, you pay him.  
×
×
  • Create New...