Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Cam Newton wouldn't trade MVP Award for Super Bowl Ring


PantherBoy95
 Share

Recommended Posts

First off, I'm not a big fan of these hypotheticals. 

Second, I'm often skeptical of what people say in that type of forum. Far too many saying things because shock value equals attention. 

Third, a football team is - at minimum - 50+ players plus coaches and all the support staff on and off the field.  I personally don’t like this notion as much but the quarterback is usually the face of the franchise, the leader. You give up your body and soul for everyone around you to where individual achievements are secondary if it means you leave the field as the ultimate winner along with everyone else. To this day, I still remember Thomas Davis utterly broken after losing the SB and the man played with a busted arm. You're telling me an MVP award isn't worth giving up if it meant he could've cried tears of joy instead? To give all those kids that special moment in their lives watching a victory parade? To put that cherry on the top for every fan here on that 2015 season instead of us still wondering if we'll ever see the Panthers lifting the Lombardi within our lifetimes?

I don't know, man. Maybe it's just how I view leadership as being so much more about those around you than yourself. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is probably a guy who should have faded into the limelight after his playing days were over. Even when he was playing it was better when he didn’t talk too much because something stupid was bound to come out of his mouth. Not sure that giving him a bigger microphone is the solution. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I will always love Cam for what he did for the franchise but that was a self centered response. Imagine if he said “Yes” because of what it would mean for the franchise and the fans. He is already a legend but a SB win as a franchise QB would have solidified his status much more than the MVP. 

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Cant change the past. Cam was the reason the team was even there in the 1st place. 15-1 didn't not happen without a good Qb. If they had WRs or any blocking at all the SB would have went different or maybe the refs should not have allowed Den to cheat and cheap shot our QB all game.

Philly Brown head almost got twisted off on a face mask at the 1 that the player said he did become he could, should have been throw out the game or the illegal batting of the ball backwards for  Den to help score a TD. 

The fact Cam was even able to play the whole game says something 

I do find it funny everyone talks about the fumble but not head shoots Cam took or the other dirty plays all game. I lost a lot of respect and love for the NFL after that season that to this day has not come back.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I see both sides.  It is a bit self-centered, but athletes are self-centered by nature.  You have to be.  When you are in high school, you are promoting yourself to get a scholarship, not the team.  When you are in the gym, you are making yourself better, even though you know there are teammates not working a hard as you.  In college--the competition on the team is intense; I was seventh on the TE depth chart in college as an incoming freshman; my thoughts were:  "I have six guys I have to beat."  They were not my friends; it was easier that way.  Remmers and the refs (people wondered if Peyton Manning's swan song was rigged) kept Cam from winning both. 

Funny, but most people don't think about the athlete's rise to prominence--all the people he had to beat, all the humiliation he caused others to get where he is.  Then they don't think about the end of an athlete's career.  All athletes come from different places and have different stories. You enter the arena alone and you leave it alone.  Very few go out on good terms.  All athletes die young.

Edited by MHS831
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Disappointing and I think most of us fans would gladly trade that mvp for a Superbowl win.  But 1) Cam doesn't always express himself well and sometimes that makes him come off poorly when his intentions are different (I don't think that's this but ... ), 2) He's a pundit now and I have a suspicion that Cam 10 years ago would have said something different. Finally, whatever he says now that may sound selfish, doesn't change how much he did for the team, so... Meh.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 hours ago, Doc Holiday said:

This isn’t news, his career in the NFL is over, he was never gonna say anything else. If I were in his shoes I wouldn’t either.

It doesn't have to be an either/or question considering he had one opportunity for both. 

Accepting of individual awards in place of a team accomplishment in the ultimate team sport just shows that maybe some of the criticism about Cam only being worried about Cam was, and remains, accurate. I won't dive into the psychology of the man but he does have some traits that are indicative of some reasons why he could never maintain a high level of success, and why people in the building were afraid to truly hold him to account so he could get better.

We never saw a leap in Cam's performance like we did with Bryce this year. Obviously Bryce's floor was so low that he had no where to go, but up, but he went from cut bait to scoring 5 touchdowns against a team competing for a playoff spot. That took a long look in the mirror, and real work, and accountability from everyone in the building to make that change; we never saw that from Cam.

I am on record as a Bryce detractor as well, before you go down that road. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, mav1234 said:

Disappointing and I think most of us fans would gladly trade that mvp for a Superbowl win.  But 1) Cam doesn't always express himself well and sometimes that makes him come off poorly when his intentions are different (I don't think that's this but ... ), 2) He's a pundit now and I have a suspicion that Cam 10 years ago would have said something different. Finally, whatever he says now that may sound selfish, doesn't change how much he did for the team, so... Meh.

Cam may have said something different before, and it mnay have been a lie. And this is the issue I'm having with Cam as I listen to more and more of him away from football. He almost seems anti-social in a way, and extremely superficial. I never bought into those criticisms before but some of that is surfacing now. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, CPcavedweller said:

Cam may have said something different before, and it may have been a lie. And this is the issue I'm having with Cam as I listen to more and more of him away from football. He almost seems anti-social in a way, and extremely superficial. I never bought into those criticisms before but some of that is surfacing now. 

When you say anti-social where does that come from/what have you seen? I felt like he'd probably been showing more of his personality, but I'm also not as tuned in to some of his newer projects.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Objectively speaking, MVP is a much, much greater accomplishment than winning the super bowl.  Only 11 players in history have won multiple MVPs.  Many, many, many more have won multiple super bowls.  To be the absolute best player in the league is an individual accomplishment only one guy can achieve each year.  Winning the superbowl is something 53 guys each year get to achieve.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What gets me… this was not some surprise question. He had time to think and come up with his response ahead of time…. And this was it. 

It could have been, ‘to see TD hoist that trophy high with a broken arm? Damn right I would.’ 

So either that didn’t occur to him, which is bad… or it did, but he chose the individual accolade over his teammates winning the highest distinction in the NFL.. and that’s just awful. 

The question was obviously designed to bait him and they knew he would respond in kind. Pretty sad all around. 

Without Cam 2015 doesn’t happen, sure….

But how about Luke calling out offenses? How about Greg keeping everything straight in the huddle? TD bringing the thunder. MVPs don’t go to dudes on losing teams. Without those 3, the panthers would have been a long shot to make the playoffs, and Cam never gets his MVP. MVP doesn’t just happen in a vacuum. It’s a team accomplishment that honors an individual player. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • In before: "XL sucks, there is no hope." "As long as we have Bryce, none of this matters." My response: "It's X, not XL...we're not discussing apparel sizes, or we'd have to consider XS."  
    • Alain Pierre provides some food for thought on Last Word On Sports regarding Xavier Legette, and his article, though specifically on X, kind of puts me in the mind of QBs being overdrafted and put into situations that they're not prepared for, some ultimately failing due to drafting missteps by front offices who don't necessarily view prospective players within the contextual importance that situations demand.  At this point, Legette looks like a failure in reference to expectations, of not only what a consistently productive NFL receiver looks like, but a first round pick (which he obviously should never have been). But the story on X isn't necessarily completely over. Damn. I seem to be experiencing deja vu...It wasn't X's fault that he was overdrafted, that was a choice by an FO that obviously downplayed actual realized skill vs outstanding measurables and upside. Sure, the FO was impressed by X's one-year feats during his senior season at South Carolina, but it was the NFL god, RAS (a.k.a. Raw Athletic Score), that had Dave Canales's and Dan Morgan's jaws dropping in amazement at the sight of X running around in underwear at the Combine...   "At 6-foot-3 and over 220 pounds, Legette brought rare athletic upside to the position. His breakout season at South Carolina showed flashes of dominance that NFL teams dream of. Projecting forward, many scouts compared his physical profile to D.K. Metcalf, and the Panthers clearly believed they could develop him into a true wide receiver 1 over time. The issue was never his talent. The issue was the timeline. Just a few picks later, the Chargers selected Ladd McConkey, a receiver who may have lacked Xavier Legette’s physical ceiling but entered the league far more technically refined. McConkey immediately showed advanced route discipline, leverage awareness, good pacing, and separation ability.  Bryce Young’s game has always depended on timing and anticipation. His best football at Alabama came with receivers capable of winning through precision rather than pure athleticism. Jameson Williams and John Metchie III were excellent route runners and were able to get drafted in 2022. McConkey naturally fit that style of play. Legette, meanwhile, needed significant development in the exact areas where Bryce Young needed help. The Panthers drafted traits when Bryce Young needed reliability."   Yes, the FO was guilty. The good thing is that the execs appear to be improving. Some of that may be attributed to the hiring of Eric Eager (who was hired right after the Xavier Legette draft). Eager seems to have helped the Panthers FO fine-tune their analytical progress, and, at least on paper, they acquired players with a lot of value during the last draft in regards to actually (what I'll refer to as) "underdrafting" talent relative to their position with value already built in.  Look at Chris Brazzell: He may be more of the quintessential project receiver who was arguably more or less just as raw as Legette was when he was drafted, and with a relatively high RAS as well. The notable difference is value, as Brazzell was a round three pick and Legette was a first rounder.    "Unlike the Xavier Legette situation, Carolina’s environment for Brazzell is completely different. "The Panthers are not asking a raw receiver prospect to stabilize this offense for Bryce Young. "Brazzell enters a much healthier developmental situation with far less pressure. With Tetairoa McMillan established as the primary target and Jalen Coker continuing to settle as the number 2 option...Xavier Legette, Metchie III, and Jimmy Horn Jr. are also still in this rotation, fighting for reps. "It gives Carolina something they failed to give Legette when they drafted him: A developmental runway. "Xavier Legette entered the league with expectations attached to a first-round pick and an offense desperate for answers. Brazzell enters a room where he can spend a year working on his route running, learning the playbook, and earning snaps gradually rather than being asked to become part of Bryce Young’s solution immediately. "And truthfully, Brazzell needs that time coming out of college. Despite his elite physical tools, many evaluators have several concerns about his overall polish as a receiver. "His route tree at Tennessee was viewed as fairly limited due to the type of offense that they run. The receivers are expected to run a lot of choice routes, which are dictated by the placement of the defenders. It doesn’t require technical route-running and an understanding of the playbook needed at the NFL level...   "Context changes significantly when expectations change. "The Panthers are not depending on Brazzell to save the offense. They can allow him to develop slowly, expand his route tree, improve his technical refinement, and learn behind a much more stable receiver room... "Traits become much easier to bet on when patience is built into the plan."   It's all about understanding your situation. I don't agree that it's an inherently difficult choice like the author is suggesting in the following excerpt. At the very least, I think that it should be easier as long as all parties involved stay levelheaded and true to their process.    "That is what makes these draft decisions so difficult. "Every front office believes it can find the next Metcalf, Owens, or Marshall. Sometimes they do. More often, they are betting on a development path that may take years to complete. "The challenge is understanding what your offense needs right now. "If a team has patience, stability, and a quarterback capable of carrying the offense while a receiver develops, betting on traits can make sense. But if a young quarterback needs immediate help, there is a strong argument for prioritizing the receiver who already knows how to separate, create throwing , and earn trust from day one. "That’s why the Xavier Legette-Ladd McConkey debate remains so fascinating. "It was never really a discussion about talent. It was a discussion about timing."   For me, Ladd McConkey was talented enough in his own right, that the gap--the upside--was never as big as people are suggesting between not only McConkey and Legette, but McConkey and other receivers drafted in the first round during that draft. The technique divide between Ladd and X was pretty stark though, as was the roughly 35 pounds, but the speed was identical, the maybe 1½ height difference isn't huge (6' and 6'1"), and it may surprise some that Ladd's RAS (9.34) was also enough to put him in the top 10 percent of receivers since 1987. There is an argument that he would've been a better pick for Bryce and the Panthers, regardless of timeline and talent. But, I still appreciate the thesis (if you will) of the article, as it still provides some hope--perhaps a glimmer at this point, that X's RAS may finally translate to the NFL given more time, but, perhaps more importantly, it explains how Dan Morgan and company are showing improvement, even if it appears somewhat understated. My hope is that continued improvement is palpable by this time next year. https://lastwordonsports.com/nfl/2026/05/30/xavier-legette-draft-lessons/#google_vignette        
    • Won’t stop until people stop buying overpriced poo.
×
×
  • Create New...