Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

BREAKING: Myles Garrett Requests Trade from CLE

PantherBoy95

By PantherBoy95,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

tukafan21 Grand Master

tukafan21

Posted
Posted

I genuinely wonder what team could even make a trade for Garrett.

Because it's more than just giving up the picks, as if you give up multiple 1sts for him, you HAVE to sign him to an extension to make sure you're keeping him around for years.  And if you have to give him the extension right away, that also means you need a lot of cap room this offseason.

How many teams are a pass rusher away from being a SB contender, have the picks, and have the cap room?

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Basbear Grand Master

Basbear

Posted
Posted (edited)
13 minutes ago, tukafan21 said:

I genuinely wonder what team could even make a trade for Garrett.

Because it's more than just giving up the picks, as if you give up multiple 1sts for him, you HAVE to sign him to an extension to make sure you're keeping him around for years.  And if you have to give him the extension right away, that also means you need a lot of cap room this offseason.

How many teams are a pass rusher away from being a SB contender, have the picks, and have the cap room?

 

 I think the first Mack package is a ballpark- 1st and 3rd.....I feel that's too light. tho

He's got 2 years left and what 29(?), but he's a peppers-like alien, so that age doesn't equal "old". Plus best I know, he's been healthy and no big injuries. The worst thing on the resume was the fake n-word and helmet swing on helmentless player. 

I mean if I was a GM that was very comfy with my roster, Id almost trade too much for him along with giving him new mega deal. If I was 85% sure my team could make the playoff the next two years, I would trade two 1st and maybe even mid-rounder/mid player for him. 

He's a difference maker. He's a big nerd, no off-field BS like many others. I'd try for less, but Id give up kings haul for him. 

 

Edited by Basbear
Link to comment
Share on other sites
tukafan21 Grand Master

tukafan21

Posted
Posted
31 minutes ago, Basbear said:

 I think the first Mack package is a ballpark- 1st and 3rd.....I feel that's too light. tho

He's got 2 years left and what 29(?), but he's a peppers-like alien, so that age doesn't equal "old". Plus best I know, he's been healthy and no big injuries. The worst thing on the resume was the fake n-word and helmet swing on helmentless player. 

I mean if I was a GM that was very comfy with my roster, Id almost trade too much for him along with giving him new mega deal. If I was 85% sure my team could make the playoff the next two years, I would trade two 1st and maybe even mid-rounder/mid player for him. 

He's a difference maker. He's a big nerd, no off-field BS like many others. I'd try for less, but Id give up kings haul for him. 

 

I'm not saying he isn't worth trading for, but if he only wants to go to a contender, you then have to have a contender who has the cap space to give him a new deal (as if you give up multiple 1sts for him and don't sign him to an extension immediately, then you're beyond dumb).

I was more genuinely asking the question, as I didn't feel like looking up potential cap space amongst contenders.

I'm sure there are probably a dozen or so teams that would GLADLY give up multiple firsts and give him a monster extension, but they might not be the teams he's thinking can contend in 2025 by adding him and using up their cap space and draft picks to do so.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Aussie Tank Grand Master

Aussie Tank

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, tukafan21 said:

I genuinely wonder what team could even make a trade for Garrett.

Because it's more than just giving up the picks, as if you give up multiple 1sts for him, you HAVE to sign him to an extension to make sure you're keeping him around for years.  And if you have to give him the extension right away, that also means you need a lot of cap room this offseason.

How many teams are a pass rusher away from being a SB contender, have the picks, and have the cap room?

 

Watch the Falcons go after him 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
jtm Proficient

jtm

Posted
Posted

This is one of the few players at a critical position that it is worth paying a king's ransom.  I actually think the Panthers will be considered a playoff contender next year, but not a Super Bowl contender.  I doubt this happens, but it would be an amazing pick up.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • strato
      2027: Sharing my thoughts on the cap without a lotta research

      By strato · Posted

      Would you just fuging quit trying to make us like him? That is his job, not yours.  Thank you. 
    • LinvilleGorge
      2027: Sharing my thoughts on the cap without a lotta research

      By LinvilleGorge · Posted

      Rookie season being key to uour argument. I didn't at all mislead about the talent Cam had to work with. Kalil was a great center. Olsen was a great TE. Our WRs were probably the worst in the league. Cam still won MVP, we went 15-1, and we went to the SB. Your attempt to bring up Cam to defend Bryce is desperate and clownish. Bryce has more talent to work with and has done WAY less.
    • cranky
      2027: Sharing my thoughts on the cap without a lotta research

      By cranky · Posted

      Not exactly sure that is an honest assesment of the talent he had to work with that year. Olsen had over 1100 yards that season making the PB, Stewart had close to 1100 total yards also going to the PB. He had Kalil at C who went to the PB, Trai Turner at RG who also went to the PB, and Michael Oher at LT who played well enough that the Panthers offered him a new contract the following year. I wouldn't call that a trash OL. He also played with a defense that was stacked with talent as well.   "The thing we are doing better this time around is actually surrounding our #1 overall draft pick QB with talent vs. asking him to completely carry the offense. I just hope that effort is leading us to realize that the guy isn't even good enough to get carried." Please.... Did you not read the list of names Newton had to work with his rookie season. I guess you missed it so I will post it again for you... Steve Smith (PB), Greg Olsen (PB), Brandon LaFell, Ted Ginn JR, Deangelo Williams (PB), Jonathan Stewart (PB), Jordan Grossn (PB), Ryan Kalil (PB) on the offensive side and then he had Luke Kuechly (PB), Jon Beason (PB), Thomas Davis (PB), Star Lotulelei, Kawann Short ( PB ),Charles Johnson, Greg Hardy (PB ), Mike Mitchell, Josh Norman (PB)  For comparison, here is who Young had his first year.  Chuba Hubbard, DJ Chark, Jonathan Mingo, Adam Thielen, Hayden Hurst, Ikem Ekwonu, Chandler Zavala, Bradley Bozeman, Nash Jensen and Taylor Morton. Not a single PB player on the list and most of them aren't even playing any longer. Additionally, his HC was fired during the season and the defense was as bad as the offense.  You might not like the comparison but saying Newton had to completely carry the offense isn't exactly fair to the 4 pro bowlers on offense who played with him that year.
×
×
  • Create New...