Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Tyler Warren


 Share

Recommended Posts

bro, he does have impressive highlights and coming from pen state....they are turning out athletic freaks shows. 

Just TE is after RB, SS, and C in value terms. I hold it much higher, but the league doesn't. 

They just need every spot and depth. History has shown its best to wait on TE. Like half the league and the elite came from the 3rd 4th round. 

The deal is they need at least 2, cause Dave base is 12personal

I do see a lane in which the Panthers draft a defense stud at 8th and use the 57th on TE. 

I always want to control the middle of the field, TE allow that. I got no clue why the league doesn't pay or value them. If I was GM, Id have two studs at TE and pay whatever top dollar is (14millper LOL) for each. 

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not at #8 for me. He lacks the agility of recent prospects like Bowers, Laporta, and Kincaid. He is a beast, but I don’t think that’s our route with all of our holes. Plus, we have a promising young player already in our TE room. 
 

I’d prefer we sign someone like Austin Hooper to a cheap deal to go along with Sanders and mentor him. Maybe take a shot at someone like Briningstool, Nesbit, Lachey later in the draft. 

  • Pie 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Jon Snow said:

I would rather take the slow wr if they go offense. I would never ever take a TE in the top 10. Hell I would take an OT before I would take Warren at 8.

I kind of agree, before I saw how much Bowers has changed the future forecast of the Raiders.   That said I still think I agree on not taking a te at 8, but if they take him i won't be outraged. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Tr3ach said:

I kind of agree, before I saw how much Bowers has changed the future forecast of the Raiders.   That said I still think I agree on not taking a te at 8, but if they take him i won't be outraged. 

I would be pissed. There's no way you do that. 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

51 minutes ago, Aussie Tank said:

This team is that deviod of talent we just need to add studs. And if that's a TE in the top 10 so be it. But if it fails that's a fireable offence for a GM 

The team is devoid of talent and so is the top of the draft.  Take the best chip that falls.  It's that simple.

  • Pie 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Tr3ach said:

A lot of people are saying there are 4 blue chip guys in this draft.  Those would be Carter, Graham, Hunter, and.. Warren.  Throw away positional value and he's probably the best player on the board ar 8.  

 

Out of the best guys I follow- there's only 2 blue chips; Carter and hunter. 

Graham is short armed DT devalued, played next to a beast/team, he cheat by being a wrestler (pros will not care)

Warren is a white TE and boxes out defenders rather than getting open.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Basbear said:

 

Out of the best guys I follow- there's only 2 blue chips; Carter and hunter. 

Graham is short armed DT devalued, played next to a beast/team, he cheat by being a wrestler (pros will not care)

Warren is a white TE and boxes out defenders rather than getting open.

What?

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Ok.  I see that signs may not obstruct others view.  That seems to be a pretty large sign, and since they are in the front, if they were to hold it up, I feel it would obstruct others view. I don't see the point in holding the sign in their laps. If I were in securities shoes, I would just tell them to put it up, so that I don't have to keep a constant eye on them because not everyone listens and will just wait until I turn my back to raise the sign again.  I see no point in holding a sign on your lap where it can not be seen unless you are just waiting to break the rules again. The amount of time they have "gotten away" with this is still irrelevant.  For all we know, someone complained they could not see because of the sign.
    • Cows fan with just some info.      Some good points from y'all but some that are poorly thought out too.   Dallas played the last game (Jets, 0-4) with 4 OL starters out, Cee Dee Lamb out, #3 WR Kavontae Turpin out (he's also the League's #1 returner), #2 RB Miles Sanders out (avg 5.8 ypc).  Dak is playing very well as is Javonte Williams and George Pickens.   Cows have a lot of offensive depth and talent and are/were the #1 offense in the League.  416 yards last week and close to another 40 burger.  They suck on D ! DC Matt Eberflus plays a very soft over the top zone.  Russell Wilson (NYGiants) shredded the Cow's D for 450 passing yards  (I think there were 7 plays of 30+ yards).  In the 2nd half of the Fudge Packers game Dallas D never got a stop thus there was a tie (40-40).  With only a D ranked around the middle of the NFL pack Dallas could probably be 4-1.   Their D sux badly.   They did get a few sacks (5) against Justin Fields last Sunday in NJ otherwise they gave up 380 yards against the Jets.   We are very familiar with Rico Dowdle.
    • Nothing you or I or anyone does with regards to enjoying or moaning about wins and losses has any affect on the success or failure or shittyness factor of the franchise.
×
×
  • Create New...