Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Level Of Enthusiasm Going into Game 1


kungfoodude
 Share

How excited are you for the season?  

159 members have voted

  1. 1. Excitement Level(0-10)



Recommended Posts

I'm excited but still nervous about a few things that make me a 6:

  • Playbook/Playcalling - Is it diversified or has that all been talk? (run game in particular?) - if not, we may still have a lot of stalled drives.  Thing is, we have an OL that can play all looks - Inside zone, Power/Gap, Midzone, outside zone, Pin & Pull.  Would love if we deployed a balanced attack with it all.  Especially now that we have 3 totally capable backs in house
  • Bryce continuing his week 13-18 play - please for the love of god work out
  • Inside Linebackers - Trevin is still developing and Rozeboom has not been good without adequate support.  Our line should help but they could be bad in both the run and pass.  
  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, WUnderhill said:

I’m excited. It’s a new season, anything can happen. Cherish these moments. Last season it literally only lasted until game 1 so enjoy this while it lasts.

Also, look at it this way, one way or another we will have a franchise QB next year. Either Bryce shows he’s that guy this year and it’s a great season, or we crash and burn and have a high draft pick in a strong QB class. No matter what, this season will provide answers and clarity moving forward.

🎵"Always look on the bright side of life"🎶

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Every team is even from a win-loss perspective and I'm a half glass full kind of guy so 10!

 

The way I see it is if the offence can sustain longer drives it gives an opportunity for the defence to remain fresh and be more competent this year. 

I also think this year is it for Bryce. He has all the tools to deliver. Either he looks good and we have our QB1 or we move on in the offseason

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I can't help but think that you are equating physical attributes alone with wins. I don't subscribe to that thought. No one will argue that Young has a strong arm, but he makes up for it in other ways. The real limitation for him is he needs good route runners with great hands. That's why Young was so good at the end of the 24 season. Thielen and Coker were perfect receivers for him and he had his best games with them. Not having them to start the 25 season hurt. Look at the first 10 games in 25 with a rookie receiver and no Coker and then look at the final 7 games with a more experienced rookie and Coker back and there is a telling difference in Young's performance. Prior to week 10, Young had 1 game with a QB rating above 100, 2 games with a rating above 90 and 6 games with a rating below 90. In the last 7 games with Coker back, Young had 3 games with a QB rating above 100, 2 games with a rating above 90 and only 2 games with a rating below 90. The tools a QB has to work with matter more than their arm strength.  To go back to Darnold and Stafford, yes they both have great arm strength but neither had much success with that alone. As I already pointed out, Stafford, even with a canon for an arm, only had 4 winning seasons in his first 12 years. It was only when he went to the right environment that he had true success.
    • I don't love this role for him if I'm being totally honest The pregame show is much more flash than substance and doesn't seem like the right fit for what Luke would bring to the table, and that's his vision of the game. I'd like to see him do something where it more involves him breaking down film and explaining what he's seeing out there, as he sees the game in a way very few ever have.
×
×
  • Create New...