Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Icky appendix removed


Recommended Posts

11 minutes ago, ForJimmy said:

I highly doubt he plays Week 1.  Week 2 would be a welcomed surprise honestly.  Don't some of these surgeries have weight lifting limitations?  A 300 plus pound DE coming full speed is probably a big negative... 

Week 3 vs the first round duo in ATL is probably the first time we’ll see him. Which is very understandable that would be 4 weeks since the surgery (reported it was done Sunday 9/24) 

  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, ForJimmy said:

I highly doubt he plays Week 1.  Week 2 would be a welcomed surprise honestly.  Don't some of these surgeries have weight lifting limitations?  A 300 plus pound DE coming full speed is probably a big negative... 

depends on the surgery but even laparoscopic surgery you have lifting restrictions for a few weeks 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, jb2288 said:

My lord we can never catch a break. This one is just as odd as Nics collapsed lung. Then of course Princes shoulder. Ugh  

Maybe this is a break in a way. I’m sure Icky is a better run blocker, but it’s definitely possible that Brady Christensen is a better pass blocker.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, WUnderhill said:

Maybe this is a break in a way. I’m sure Icky is a better run blocker, but it’s definitely possible that Brady Christensen is a better pass blocker.

I heard Nijman was going to start

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • That's mostly me. I came into the season basically believing he was not ever going to be the guy but with a little bit of wait and see. It didn't take long of me seeing before I saw he was the same guy he has largely always been. Maybe in some future scenario 3-5 years from now he is confident enough to be a decent NFL QB. I don't really want to be the team waiting for that to happen. Let his 3rd, 4th, 5th or whatever team be the ones that figure it out.
    • Naw let him get to Tampa and crack his old fragile body with Radsom or Trey M I’d love to see him get rocked by this raw defense. He’s a fool thinking he would leave us for greener pastures I’m glad it played out this way should’ve stayed loyal to the ones who really wanted you.
    • And a legitimate question to ask is what does this offense look like once Bryce is off his rookie contract? How is that offensive line going to look? We have a ton of money invested up front and that is 100% unsustainable with Bryce making starting QB money. Icky and Moton are going to be 50m per season plus the guards at 32 and possibly Mays at 6-8 if we're lucky. Add in Bryce and that's 125m just on those 6 players if we tried to keep them all. It's just not doable.  So then the real question IMO becomes, if we spent the money on our OL, and less on a QB, would the outcome be that much different? I haven't seen Bryce elevate the offense enough by himself on a consistent basis to warrant the contract we would have to give him, not to mention the players we would have to give up, based on the accelerations of the bonuses as I understand them, would likely include Icky. 
×
×
  • Create New...