Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Parsons to Green Bay


PantherChris
 Share

Recommended Posts

4 hours ago, SmokinwithWilly said:

I saw two 1st rounders. Didn't see any additional picks so far. Fittershits was exceptionally stupid for rejecting the Rams offer for Burns. 

HFS. We got offered more for Burns and people were happy we turned it down only to get a 2nd and change a year later. SMH, it was so damn obvious that we should have made the deal. Burns has never taken over games like Parsons has.

  • Pie 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2026 draft is shaping up to be extremely interesting now, we have the Cowboys, Rams, and Browns all with 2 first rounders next year in what people are assuming to be a QB laden draft. 

Cowboys better hope Ezeraku ends up being extremely good. They didn't just lose Micah Parsons this off season, they also lost Demarcus Lawrence.   And iirc their best linebacker Overshown went down partway through the season last year. Trevon Digs (CB) is coming back from a major injury. 

They might have an absolutely abysmal defense this year.  Jerry really fuged them by giving Dak his most recent contract.  They could have traded his ass too and did a hard reboot .

Edited by Hoenheim
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Basbear said:

47 million per?!?!?!

 

 

1737430177905638.jpg

That's Quarterback money, insanity . If green bay doesnt make the super bowl during this contract they gave him, its basically a failure with that level of compensation of money and picks.  

Edited by Hoenheim
  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, Hoenheim said:

That's Quarterback money, insanity . If green bay doesnt make the super bowl during this contract they gave him, its basically a failure with that level of compensation of money and picks.  

I mean, every team has the same amount of money to spend, and almost all will fail to win the Super Bowl regardless of how they spend it. Now, if Parsons isn’t in the running for DPOTY every year and win it at least once over the next four years, it’s a failure. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

29 minutes ago, ECHornet said:

I mean, every team has the same amount of money to spend, and almost all will fail to win the Super Bowl regardless of how they spend it. Now, if Parsons isn’t in the running for DPOTY every year and win it at least once over the next four years, it’s a failure. 

If he helps them win a super bowl the individual award is irrelevant.

Edited by csx
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, WhoKnows said:

HFS. We got offered more for Burns and people were happy we turned it down only to get a 2nd and change a year later. SMH, it was so damn obvious that we should have made the deal. Burns has never taken over games like Parsons has.

A competent GM could have turned that Burns trade into 4 or 5 day 1 picks and still ended up with BY. Fitts was just so fugging bad. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Hoenheim said:

That's Quarterback money, insanity . If green bay doesnt make the super bowl during this contract they gave him, its basically a failure with that level of compensation of money and picks.  

There’s no way it will work out, it never does. See: Deshaun Watson and, going a little further back for a better comparison, Khalil Mack. Super Bowl teams aren’t built on a huge free agency splash signings. This will be more of a distraction than anything else. Unless it’s a multiple SB winning QB (and there’s only one of those right now) no one player is worth this kind of capital to acquire.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you think you have your franchise QB and the Packers clearly believe they do this was a good trade to make for them

2 1sts and washed Kenny Clark for a bonafide hall of famer entering his prime 

If our FO truly believe Bryce was 100% that guy then this was a move we should’ve made. Micah Parsons is as special as it gets on the defensive side of the ball

Edited by *FreeFua*
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, csx said:

 

If he helps them win a super bowl the individual award is irrelevant.

Of course, but not winning the Super Bowl doesn’t automatically make this a poor deal. If Parsons wins DPOTY each of the next four years, I wouldn’t view the contract as a failure. 
 

To me, there are two ways this contract isn’t a massive failure:

1) win a Super Bowl

2) Parsons is the most dominant defensive player over the next 4 years

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, WhoKnows said:

HFS. We got offered more for Burns and people were happy we turned it down only to get a 2nd and change a year later. SMH, it was so damn obvious that we should have made the deal. Burns has never taken over games like Parsons has.

A 12 year old playing madden franchise mode would have accepted that trade. Scott might be a perfectly nice human being but he has abjectly horrendous judgement as a football management professional. The fact he still has a job in the NFL at all shows the level of ineptitude the NFL allows in its good ole boy network. 

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, hepcat said:

A 12 year old playing madden franchise mode would have accepted that trade. Scott might be a perfectly nice human being but he has abjectly horrendous judgement as a football management professional. The fact he still has a job in the NFL at all shows the level of ineptitude the NFL allows in its good ole boy network. 

Just looked up that he went to Washington. Damn, besides a deep playoff run last year, they are basically the opposite of what the Buffalo Bills are to us. Taking the worst former Panthers

Edited by Move the Panthers to Raleigh
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • They know within 15 mins.  Many moons ago skins drafted Heath Shuler at like 5th overall and Gus Frerotte in the late rounds. You know the plan, its Heaths team. Old OLman stink said within 15 minutes they knew Gus was the better QB.  I didn't need 15 or players on the same field, I just knew like Bill said "he better walk on water", which he hasn't. I do blame tepper mainly for it, he spend the greater part of 2 year telling everyone Watson would be a panther......and fail....but a great fail...then Stanford turned panthers down.....tepper was beyond pissed and wanted a QB. He forced the trade and picked BY......and now by .....some grace of the gods formed a team with 4 QBs of no hope...... insane given the other roster spots.....
    • He definitely knows nothing about the Panthers, but there’s no denying he’s a pioneer in this whole draft grading and mock draft field.
    • I actually say wait five years since that's long enough to know if a player  became something worthy enough for a long term contract, whether with their original team or someone else. Therefore... 1 (8): Jaycee Horn - Has been questions about his durability but when he's healthy, he plays at a high level. Should we have drafted Pat Surtain or Micah Parsons, however? Arguably could’ve done better, but he's still here so that's a W pick. 2 (59): Terrance Marshall - Yet another classic Panther WR bust. I don’t recall seeing anything in his college tape that made me excited about drafting him in the first place.  3 (70): Brady Christensen - Proved to be a versatile player on the O-line.  As of now, we haven’t signed him back and I feel that we should. That's enough to say he was a solid draft pick. 3 (83): Tommy Tremble - Hasn't emerged as a consistent productive player, but he's had his moments here and there. We can certainly do better, but we haven’t found that guy yet so he still has some utility. W because he's not Ian Thomas. 4 (126): Chuba Hubbard - Surprise of the draft. It took time, but he's now our lead back.  5 (158): Daviyon Nixon - Had a half a sack with us and... that's it. I think I liked what I saw but it didn't pan out. 5 (166): Keith Taylor - Another guy I liked but only stuck around for two years. Played for a few other teams but nothing really to note. 6 (193): Deonte Brown - I really thought this guy was going to be a steal. He might’ve been the guy that had weight issues and never really got a handle on it. 6 (204): Shi Smith - He scored double the touchdowns that Marshall did in his short time here; it was two. Yeah, the Panthers wide receiver history is rather bleak. 6 (222): Thomas Fletcher - I had to look it up but he was a long snapper. JJ Jansen is immortal, so it was a wasted draft pick. 7 (232): Phil Hoskins - Actually recorded a sack here in his short career. Wish I could remember it.   Surprisingly not a bad draft when you have two good/great starters and a JAG that's still here, plus a good rotation guy most would like to keep. 
×
×
  • Create New...