Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

With the 1st Pick in the 2026 Draft....


chknwing
 Share

Recommended Posts

39 minutes ago, Jmac said:

Not me.....I've seen enough 

One game doesn't make a successful  career.

This is the 3rd season where he started off playing beyond shitty effectively putting the team behind the 8 ball from the jump.  Now its obviously not all on him but 3 x is a damn trend and you cannot risk that a 4rth time.

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

50 minutes ago, Jmac said:

Not me.....I've seen enough 

One game doesn't make a successful  career.

Lol I am not saddle broke either. Agree. 
But do you remember the second half (a half mind you) of Green Bay in 2023 and how long we were told about it? 
Irrational stanning is hard to stamp out. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, mrcompletely11 said:

but the pff big time throws..........

The weirdest stat.. I tried to get the definition straight, it was all over the place. 
‘A big time throw is one into a tight window or this or that’ and just stopped. I have eyes. I can see what a good throw is. And I saw every one of them. Many twice. Or more 

Edited by strato
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Quite a few mocks have us going Edge with our first pick, which I think is odd considering we got Nick and Princely looking good. I think we have to take a Quarterback if one we like is there. Please don't trade down; the class isn't that good.  One mock has us taking the Safety out of OSU, but that seems like it would be high for the position, even though he looks to be an A+ prospect. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, rebelrouser said:

Quite a few mocks have us going Edge with our first pick, which I think is odd considering we got Nick and Princely looking good. I think we have to take a Quarterback if one we like is there. Please don't trade down; the class isn't that good.  One mock has us taking the Safety out of OSU, but that seems like it would be high for the position, even though he looks to be an A+ prospect. 

if we dont pick up the 5th there is no way we dont go qb unless DC convinces them he can rehab Russ, kenny pickett, jimmy g, wentz etc.

 

on the flip side if we do draft one and DC is on a short leash we are already setting up for failure.  5 wins or less and just clean fuging house top to bottom, nobody would give a poo

  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, rebelrouser said:

Quite a few mocks have us going Edge with our first pick, which I think is odd considering we got Nick and Princely looking good. I think we have to take a Quarterback if one we like is there. Please don't trade down; the class isn't that good.  One mock has us taking the Safety out of OSU, but that seems like it would be high for the position, even though he looks to be an A+ prospect. 

Reuben Bain Jr and Caleb Downs seem to be the blue chippers on defense this year and I have no qualms with obtaining one of them.

  • Pie 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

38 minutes ago, rebelrouser said:

Quite a few mocks have us going Edge with our first pick, which I think is odd considering we got Nick and Princely looking good. I think we have to take a Quarterback if one we like is there. Please don't trade down; the class isn't that good.  One mock has us taking the Safety out of OSU, but that seems like it would be high for the position, even though he looks to be an A+ prospect. 

Here is the main deal. If you are picking inside the top 8-10, the focus nearly must fall on the following- QB, WR, Edge/DE, LT, DT. There's always exceptions- Luke, Quetin Nelson, CB, and RT names.

The facts are the Panthers have what the 31st ranked pass rush or last in sacks with NIc and Prince. You can play 4 edges on the same play. Drafting a edge would be correct move. 

Panthers need talent and talent at the difference making spots. 

100% avoid safety, in the top 10 even top 20. The only way to break this rule, clones of Sean Taylor, Ed Reed, or Ronnie Lott.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Smitty will punch you said:

My guy they’ve played a total of 5 games in their career so far. Relax. 

We are talking draft stock, not the end product of their careers  Take the media's slobbering obsession over Sanders out of the equation...who went in the 5th round anyhow, and you basically had Cam Ward.  Dart got a little love right before the draft, but yeah, it was not a much hyped QB draft at all.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Would Morgan or Beason have been HOFers' if injuries hadn't derailed their careers?  I was not a close watcher of the game when Morgan was in his prime but I thought Beason had a few seasons at close to Lukes' level of play.
    • Franchise QBs feast when things are rolling and the tide that raises boats when things are going sideways.  Bryce isn't that. He's a complimentary player, that's it.  When the defense and STs are on point, he plays loose and it shows.  When we are in a dog fight and things haven't gone our way, he struggles.  It's that simple. He's not a horrible QB, but he's not top tier either.  So the question begs, is this worthy of a second contract?  The answer should be no.  It definitely is my answer. Bryce will never be a QB that can produce wins largely on his arm.  That's a FRANCHISE QB, any other QB is simply a placeholder at the starter's position until that guy can be found.   At some point the excuses of lack of weapons will be a straw man.  Heck, it's nearly there now.  I mean if he doesn't look even better than last year will we blame it on the TE position?  'Well if Bryce only had a player like Kelce, Kittle or Gronk on this team...'  Are we really going to do that?  
    • When I arrived at college, I was 18, not too much younger than some of these draft picks.  It was not a huge school, but there were guys on the team who were 21, 22, 23....playing ahead of me.  I was seventh on the depth chart.  Those guys have been through a few seasons, were stronger, more knowledgeable.  I was a better raw player than some of them, but those other factors matter.  As I grew stronger, more familiar with the playbook, and learned what it was like to play in college, I gradually improved and with that, I rose up the depth chart.  It took most of my freshman year for the light to come on.  Had the coach thrown me into the starting lineup day 1, I would have probably failed.    And that was college.  So I agree with you based on my experience on a much lower level.  Frankly, I think that is why so many kids drafted to fill huge gaps bust.  The teams are desperate.  Anyone who looks to fill vacancies in the starting lineup through the draft is desperate.  You draft depth to develop.  For this reason, I say, "Let Walker start for a while."  Maybe Brazzell can be our WR 4.  Throw Hunter into a rotation and ask him to do one or two things.  Freeling needs some strength and he needs to work on run blocking.
×
×
  • Create New...