Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

The Bryce Young "Game Winning Drive" narrative needs to end


electro's horse
 Share

Recommended Posts

I agree with OP notion, QBs always get credited for game winning drives even if they do minimal. Just last night Caleb got credited for a GE drive when they basically ran the ball the whole drive and only had to go 36 yards.

 

And there are drives where Bryce could of had a game winning drive if not for a Legette drop vs Philly or a Chubba fumble vs Tampa 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, mrBdawg said:

You are actually, genuinely comparing Bryce to Jimmy fuging Pickles?

Jimmy accounted for 3 touchdowns in his 10 starts in 2010. In Bryce’s 10 games post benching last year, he accounted for 20 touchdowns.

Jimmy threw three touchdowns in 2010. Three. Bryce has thrown 10 touchdowns through 6 games. He is currently on track to throw for 3300 yards, 28 touchdowns and 14 interceptions.

Wtf are we even talking about anymore. I mean seriously

Yeah, you can pick out 11 games from Bryce’s rookie season….where he accounted for just 3 total TDs.  

Hmmm….pretty sure that’s most definitely was Jimmy-esque.   It was historically bad QB play from Bryce.  Like I said, he would have been gone after his rookie season if he cost a 2nd round pick.  No second season.  

Bringing up Cam and Jake is the wild part.   Bryce isn’t better than PJ freaking Walker 

  • Pie 2
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

57 minutes ago, ProcessBlue2 said:

This is what people don’t get. For him to really zip a ball longer than 15-20 yards or to get the ball wayyyyy downfield he has to set up just right and put his body into it. Which is frustrating because you see the Mayfields, Mahomes, Herberts, etc make the same throw running for their life on their backfoot.

he can do it, its just harder for him to do it than most QBs.

That is sort of the whole thing for some people. Count me in. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, CRA said:

Yeah, you can pick out 11 games from Bryce’s rookie season….where he accounted for just 3 total TDs.  

Hmmm….pretty sure that’s most definitely was Jimmy-esque.   It was historically bad QB play from Bryce.  Like I said, he would have been gone after his rookie season if he cost a 2nd round pick.  No second season.  

Bringing up Cam and Jake is the wild part.   Bryce isn’t better than PJ freaking Walker 

His head coach wanted nothing to do with him and lost his job over it. 
We are almost 2.5 seasons later still arguing about it. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, PNW_PantherMan said:

According to Pro Football Reference, a game-winning drive (GWD) is defined by the following criteria: 

  • The team must win the game.
  • The offensive drive must occur in the fourth quarter or overtime.
  • The scoring play that ultimately puts the winning team ahead for the final time must be the result of this offensive drive.
  • At the start of the drive, the team must be tied or trailing by no more than one score (1-8 points).
  • The drive can start in the third quarter, as long as offensive plays are run in the fourth quarter or overtime. 

As long as the same criteria is used for every quarterback in the league I am fine with his game winning drives. No one is going to overlook the W-L record the panthers have over the time Bryce has been here. The game winning drives are a credit to the players on the field, not just Bryce. If just one receiver had not made a crucial catch when targeted in the last 6 minutes of the game we would be having a different conversation this week. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, GoobyPls said:

And there are drives where Bryce could of had a game winning drive if not for a Legette drop vs Philly or a Chubba fumble vs Tampa 

He threw too flat of a ball. XL was wide the fug open. Better throw and a guy with broken ribs doesn’t have to fully lay out. 

And that wasn’t the last throw of the game. It was second and four. Bryce ate poo the next two plays. 

and if Chuba hadn’t fumbled they’d probably have just kept running him. Then we’d have people arguing that Bryce throwing one pass and Chuba running 5-6 times was actually a gwd because….

Edited by electro's horse
Link to comment
Share on other sites

That TD pass to Legette against Miami. Elite.

The play where Bryce rolls right to buy time until Tet can reverse field.  Bryce pumps as multiple defenders close in.  He barely gets it away before he takes a big time hit.  Beautiful off platform throw and great catch by Tet.  

The second TD to Tet against Dallas where Bryce dips and turns his shoulder in to evade the pass rusher.  Resets and finds Tet in the end zone.

Dude embodies the Keep Pounding mantra.  

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, ProcessBlue2 said:

Look I’m one of Bryce Young’s greatest critics. 
 

But in 2003 Jake Delhomme threw 19 TDs and 16 Ints and barely got 3200 yards. We went to the Super Bowl and won 10 games by 1 score or less. And guess what, we wouldn’t have gotten there without Jake. 
 

Maybe we don’t have a Newton this time, maybe we have a Delhomme who makes you cuss as much as you cheer. And honestly I don’t give a single damn if we have a Clausen as long as we are winning games. 
 

My biggest gripe about Bryce is that we weren’t winning games, now we are winning games. Winning cures all. And if we start falling apart again then it’s  whatever and we should change whatever we need to so we can fix it, but right now something is working.

Winning ain't gonna make my eyes lie to me.

Context matters, and it will always matter in the game of football.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, BlazeCarolina said:

Comparing Bryce to Pickles is another crazy take imo.  No idea why y'all hate this kid so bad.

I don't think I am going to get anywhere if you can seriously make that comparison.  Wild.

Funny part about the Clausen comparison is that had we not traded away the farm to get Young, the rookie year results were similar (1-9 vs 2-14) and we got the #1 overall pick after both rookie years.

Had we tried to tank better (trade Burns and Moore for 3 1sts and 1 2nd) and just picked Bryce without trading, we might have had Cam #2. We’ll never know but the comparison isn’t as far off as you think. Bryce was better since Jimmy was even more hot garbage but with our bad trade up (Bryce wasn’t worth it), he avoided a Josh Rosen type situation.

By the way, I’m enjoying the wins so far but I thought it was interesting that both led to the #1 pick after rough rookie starts.

Edited by WhoKnows
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you nitpick these stats for Bryce Young than you should also do it for every other QB in the league. i am 100% sure that all QBs that have GWD under their belt have similar drives that are listed as questionable by the OP. 

Bottom Line most QBs don't call these plays they only execute them.  If they succeed to get their team in position to score a TD or FG, it's a GWD no matter how ugly it may be.

Edited by DaveThePanther2008
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ive never liked the term game winning drives because they include games where the QB was part of or was the reason the team was behind in the first place. Ive been arguing against this stat since the Delhomme years. It should only count when the QB is out of the equation of reasons why the team fell behind in the first place and is at least half the reason why he led the last drive to give them a lead. It shouldnt count if they just hand it off most of the time and the RB is on fire and they go down and score a TD or FG.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Not one single pick that is asking me why we drafted a guy in the first place. It was a guy we needed and/or a guy that had certain traits making them stand out. Best of all, I feel everyone we drafted are capable of stepping onto the field this year and have a meaningful role (even Kuwatch on special teams). Obviously, nothing is guaranteed but I'm not seeing any huge flags on guys because they're risky projects or massive overreaches.
    • Here is how Morgan is strategic-He re-signs Scott because he was not going S in round 1--he had the chance, and he did not.  He saw the top of the draft at T and knew none of them would be ready to start day 1, so he signs a veteran to a one-year deal, giving his tackle selection a chance to learn and prepare for what might be LT or RT.  Those two moves suggested, perhaps ironically because they contradict each other, what he was going to do, based on the talent pool.  He never brought in a Robinson replacement at DE/NT, and then moves up to draft one.   I almost wonder if the intent was to draft DT/DE all along at some point, maybe with a trade back, but then Freeling dropped to them.   Of course, we felt that they were looking WR, and wonder if the plan was to draft a WR in round 2 if you traded back in round 1.  However, when Freeling was there, the trade back fell apart.  Then we traded up for Hunter.  We could stick with XL and hope Metchie steps up, so we sat still in round three and took Brazell II, a 1000 yard speedster and perfect Z WR.  What a break. At that time, CB and Center were our biggest needs, and with several possible centers on the board and a good fit for our defense at CB, we grabbed Will Lee III.  Lee and Thornton have people in front of them, but I think Morgan knew we needed a guy who can play the outside and press--and probably step in as Jackson's replacement in 2027.    After making trades to get back into the fifth round, where we grabbed one of the best centers in the draft.  This is significant because we signed Fortner to a one-year deal; maybe Morgan saw what some of us saw--the center position is strong in this draft--on day 3, and day 3 players need a year, in most cases.  Moments later, a safety they had been talking to whose skill set matched what we are looking for in a FS.  As stated, Scott was signed,  but the fact that the Panthers were talking to Wheatley and not Theiemann means that they might have known they were not going FS early, but would need a developmental FS later--which explains why we signed Scott.  So if you pay attention to the one-year, vet deals, you can tell where we planned to sign later-round, developmental players.  What positions did we draft early that did not have 1-year veterans signed in front of them:  DL (Hunter) and WR (I don't count Metchie because I count starting-level players). I would not be surprised to learn later that the plan was DT and WR in rounds 1 and 2--then Freeling fell.  Notice that Freeling--from Mt Pleasant SC, did not come in for a visit.  Most of the other OT candidates had short arms or were certain to be gone. I don't think Freeling was in their plans.  I think a trade back and Hunter and maybe Boston was the vision.  I am guessing that CB was also high on their list.   So in this draft, we got 
    • This is one area I think that is not getting enough exposure in the midst of all the optimism. I like Chuba a great deal from a personal standpoint but he has largely proven nothing on a consistent basis yet. He's had the one season of production but before that most people pegged us as moving on. And last year injuries or not he just did not have that juice. The rest of the guys are completely unproven. I don't see anyone among the group having a game or a handful of games worth of high level production the way Rico Dowdle did last year. And yeah he dropped off and yeah he got an attitude about our incompetent handling of the touches which was honestly justified on his part and he moved on but he did legitimately save our season. That's what it is going to take to seize control of the NFC South. We all know that we will not be passing all over defenses. It is what it is. So who amongst this RB group is capable of doing that? And if we are struggling to run the ball AND pass are we going to revert to making excuses for our coach and QB again? That is definitely getting old.
×
×
  • Create New...