Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Where do you fall on the Bryce Young spectrum?


Bear Hands
 Share

Where do you fall on the Bryce Young spectrum?  

149 members have voted

  1. 1. It's been so spirited for so long, let's draw some lines in the sand. Where do you fall on the Bryce spectrum?

    • Full-on fan - He is our Franchise QB, present & future
    • The door is still open for him being the answer
    • The door is closed barring a major run
    • Nope, he's not the answer - Doesn't matter what he does


Recommended Posts

Okay I think they get to this at 10:30 

I can’t link it to start at that place for some reason. 
 Anyhow it isn’t the most awful thing but in the moment it got my attention. These local radio people are generally loathe to call Young out the way they did here. 

Edited by strato
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, kungfoodude said:

I just don't see this turning into a franchise QB situation with his wild inconsistency. 

The offense has gotten better but it's been more not as a result of him than as a result of him. 

Totally disagree. Listen to his teammates. He is the glue that keeps the offense together. He has the confidence to Keep Pounding. If you listened to him miked up against Miami you could see him willing his teammates to stay positive which mushroomed when he lead the comeback after burying us early with errors. You can see how hard his teammates fight for him and the team. He is the heart of the offense which as a QB is his biggest job as a leader.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, kungfoodude said:

Yes but this is the Kyle Allen argument. The eye test for Allen was rough even during the "Baby GOAT" streak. To an extent Bryce is similar. The eye test isn't the best even in these wins. TO's, missed throws, missed reads, etc. However, he has definitely made some good to great throws too. They are just too few and far between 

Luckily, we've got more games ahead to watch and see what happens. Maybe he keeps growing his game, maybe we see that he's topped out when we hit stiffer competition. Or maybe he flames out against a team he should well be able to beat like the Jets this weekend.

I really can't tell where all of this will end. I can say, though, there's no reason to hit the kid at the moment. Let him roll for as long as he can. 

Heck, Sam Darnold is setting the league on fire right now, along with Baker Mayfield and Daniel Jones. Examples of guys mired in bad coaching on bad teams (sometimes our own) that hit their stride just as a team did. Maybe we're about to get lucky. 

I do know one thing. The biggest change in a winning Bryce and a losing Bryce is that when he plays fearlessly, he is a hell of a competitor. When he gets scared, and he has so many times, it all just falls apart for him and no team can save him. Bravery makes the difference and it comes from believing in not just himself, but his line, his receivers, his running back and the play calling. Just like most young QBs.

And quite a few of the old ones. Rodgers couldn't make it in the chaos of the Jets situation. He can in Pittsburgh, so it seems. 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Luciu5 said:

He has shown he can pull off some high end throws and be clutch in some situations. He has been really inconsistent and turnovers are his biggest issue. I think his turnovers are mostly happenning due to his size and not being able to see the field clearly in a condensed pocket.

I think he will be an NFL starter in this league for awhile if he can find the right situation and staff. I am not certain if Canales can be that guy for Bryce, but we have seen some positive signs with this, such as week 18 last year and week 6 this year.

I don't put much stock in year 1. It seems like that coaching staff was a mess and I don't know if they just didn't want Bryce, but I get the impression they didn't even try to make it work with him.

The tl,dr version of this is simply, I think he has the potential to be a better player than Sam Darnold currently is. I think the most likely scenario is he finds success on another team.

"turnovers are his biggest issue. I think his turnovers are mostly happenning due to his size and not being able to see the field clearly in a condensed pocket"

They're not as bad as everyone makes them out to be. If you look at just his last 17 games, he has 11 ints and 5 fumbles. That's on 518 drop backs so about 3.08% of his dropbacks resulted in a turnover.

Newton in his second year had 15 turnovers on 485 attempts so he was also right at 3.09% as well.

Baker Mayfield 4.3%

Sam Darnold 3.6%

Drew Brees 3.06%

Andy Dalton 3.78%

So I don't think it's fair to say he has a problem with turnovers, at least not when comparing him to other starting QBs in their second year

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, cranky said:

"turnovers are his biggest issue. I think his turnovers are mostly happenning due to his size and not being able to see the field clearly in a condensed pocket"

They're not as bad as everyone makes them out to be. If you look at just his last 17 games, he has 11 ints and 5 fumbles. That's on 518 drop backs so about 3.08% of his dropbacks resulted in a turnover.

Newton in his second year had 15 turnovers on 485 attempts so he was also right at 3.09% as well.

Baker Mayfield 4.3%

Sam Darnold 3.6%

Drew Brees 3.06%

Andy Dalton 3.78%

So I don't think it's fair to say he has a problem with turnovers, at least not when comparing him to other starting QBs in their second year

Why would you cherry pick a number of games and lay it out vs other players 2nd year?  Seems disingenuous.  

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, cranky said:

"turnovers are his biggest issue. I think his turnovers are mostly happenning due to his size and not being able to see the field clearly in a condensed pocket"

They're not as bad as everyone makes them out to be. If you look at just his last 17 games, he has 11 ints and 5 fumbles. That's on 518 drop backs so about 3.08% of his dropbacks resulted in a turnover.

Newton in his second year had 15 turnovers on 485 attempts so he was also right at 3.09% as well.

Baker Mayfield 4.3%

Sam Darnold 3.6%

Drew Brees 3.06%

Andy Dalton 3.78%

So I don't think it's fair to say he has a problem with turnovers, at least not when comparing him to other starting QBs in their second year

Those QBs were also playing much more aggressive and accounting for more offensive production.  Thats got to be part of a turnover convo.  
 

Brett Favre having 15 INTs and Bridgewater having 15 INTs aren’t going to represent the same in reality 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, CRA said:

Those QBs were also playing much more aggressive and accounting for more offensive production.  Thats got to be part of a turnover convo.  
 

Brett Favre having 15 INTs and Bridgewater having 15 INTs aren’t going to represent the same in reality 

First off the point is his turnover percentage is no worse than any in that list so saying he has too many turnovers is simply not accurate - at least when compared to others. Secondly, you'll have to show me something to prove the aggresive and accounting part. It's just your opinion at this point to me. 

Edited by cranky
Clarity
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, *FreeFua* said:

Option 2 for me

He’s only 24 years old and this organization set him up to fail horribly from day 1

Seems like there may be a light at the end of tunnel all of a sudden but until I see this organization turn it around and see Bryce with a proper team around him I don’t want to see them ship him off 

Option 4 for me.

I would love to play against Bryce Young every week. 

  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's looking like option 3 but if Bryce and the team can string together some hard nosed football resulting in wins on the road maybe that could be subject to change. I mean that would be best case scenario all around because even if we draft another QB or target a vet nothing is ever guaranteed. But that's really the only way there's a path forward for him here. Can't compete for anything of note or significance if you only play well at home. Bryce this season will either lead us to relevancy or back to the drawing board. That's it.

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • In my view, the realistic expectation for this team to compete will start 2027.  At that time, I think we could be looking at the following (this is HIGHLY speculative):   QB:  You know, Bryce.  I am not a fan, but they don't ask me.  But there is reason for hope--and here it is.  Bryce will be entering his prime.  Since we are likely to pay him, there will be changes that I include throughout this exercise--I realistically speculate on what they are going to do with Bryce and then I realistically speculate on what means in terms of the cap and other positions. Bryce HAS IMPROVED.  The idea is that if you give him more weapons and protection, that will continue.  His career:   At this rate, if his growth continues, by 2027 we should expect nearly 30 TDs and about 12 Interceptions and a Rating of about 98.  His completion percentage should settle at 65-66% or so.  If that happens, you can win with it. The following stats demonstrate how the Panthers will be able to afford it (and re-sign Ickey) My guess is they will require about $60m per year. This is why rookies who can play are important.  It also helps us see the blueprint.  You may disagree, but this is the cruel realities of the salary cap. Robert Hunt:  Cut post June 1 and save $19m.  Who do you replace him with?  Ickey. Tershawn Wharton:  Cutting him saves nearly $15m.  We should all hope to see Aaron Hall (UDFA) make the roster and play well.  Regardless, this is a position we would likely have to address in the next draft. Trevin Moehrig:  Cutting Moehrig as the starting SS saves this team $16.5m.   Ransom will be on year 3 of a cheap rookie deal and should be more than ready to take the reins.  their styles are similar.  Furthermore, FS Wheatley (R, 4th round) will be starting. Taylor Moton:  So much depends on his knee, but I have an idea that he can play another 3 years.  extending him could save the team about $5m per year.  Cutting him outright would save the team about $21m. In the most drastic situation, we have to cut Moton and the other three players mentioned.   We would need (in all likelihood) a starting DT and RT.  It is possible that the DE would be addressed, but Wharton's production (so far) could be equaled by a rookie.  Look for a cut free agent and a 2027 draft pick here.  If you cut Moton, you save $21m, and that would be the only big hole to fill.  Having Ickey at RG gives you some depth at T, and Ickey could be the guy.  T could be pick in the 2027 draft (first round), fwiw.  It saves you $21m while costing you $5m, for example. We get younger, creating a core of Freeling, Hecht, and the RT first rounder in 2027) along with Ekownu (second contract in the $15m range, and Lewis, whose contract would be in the $16m range if not extended.)  The OL cuts (Hunt, Moton) would save $40m.  The OL would get younger and still solid with veterans at G.   By cutting Wharton (no brainer if his play stays the same) and Moehrig (good player--but we have Ransom on a rookie contract who would not be that much of a drop off--if any) in addition to Hunt and Moton, we would save over $70m in cap room. We would be able to give Bryce bag  and we would have enough to re-sign Ickey (if the knee is not too risky) to a Guard contract (probably at a discount, coming off that injury).  Furthermore, we could add a RT in the draft (or a RG if Ickey moves to RT) and that would be the only large hole to fill. Correct my logic if you see issues-- On defense, in addition to the aforementioned, Scott ($2m contract) is out, replaced by a 4th round rookie contract. CB Jackson's contract ($7.8m) expires and he is (possibly) replaced by a rookie contract.  At Edge, patrick Jones II's $10m contract expires and he is likely a reserve, and his role is absorbed by Phillips, Scourton, Princely, and possible an UDFA like Isaiah Smith or a 2027 draft pick.   These productive developmental players over the past 2 drafts will pay huge dividends.  On paper, I see the team getting much younger and possibly better while cutting nearly $100m and reallocating that money to get more production.          
    • If everything played out and that last thing happened, I probably just quit. 
×
×
  • Create New...