Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Garrett Wilson is doubtful


TD alt
 Share

Recommended Posts

4 minutes ago, NAS said:

I agree Denver had a better offense than us and struggled in London to score

Yeah, their defense isn't as bad as they look on paper. They are fast and will hit. I think this is gonna be a street fight.  4 of their 6 loses have been by less than one score. The other 2 were to the Bills and Cowboys. 

Edited by Navy_football
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I mean, this SHOULD be the most obvious gameplan from Ejero if I've ever seen one. Stack the box for Breece and Fields read option, let Moehrig spy Fields all game, and let Horn and Mike Jack play man with whoever tf they got left at WR. If Fields beats you with his arm, then so be it. But knowing Ejero, he's going to play soft zone and let Fields and Co waltz down the field. 

Edited by Castavar
  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is kind of irrelevant but it's kind of funny seeing posters who two games ago said they weren't watching the Panthers anymore until Bryce was gone- back to watching, if we lose they'll say the same thing and might actually mean it this time 

Edited by dep
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, dep said:

This is kind of irrelevant but it's kind of funny seeing posters who two games ago said they weren't watching the Panthers anymore until Bryce was gone- back to watching, if we lose they'll say the same thing and might actually mean it this time 

Those Bryce haters always derailing posts, amirite?

Anyway, this hugely increases our chances but Fields is precisely the kind of QB we could have trouble with, and the Jets have a defense that could give us trouble. If they lean into stopping the run - which they probably will - we will need TMac and Bryce to step it up to get a win.  I think the Jets are better than their record but still not very good. Then again, nor are we, lol

  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Absolutely LOVED Smitty as a player. Who didn't? But Smitty the person, yeah... not so much. Unfortunately all those things that made us love him as a player had no off switch. He was basically the exact same person off the field that was on the field and that's obviously just not gonna work well in polite society.  
    • And our record says we were a losing team that lucked into getting into the playoffs. Playoffs are not our standard because we didn't earn our way in, the Falcons had to do it for us. We also got in because the NFCS sent another losing record team to the playoffs and the Panthers are the only team in the NFL to go twice with a losing record. That's not something to be proud of. The reason I brought up the 13 and 16 point scores was those are not typically wins most weeks in the NFL. In fact, there were 31 wins this season where the winning team scored under 20. 7 of those happened in week 18. That means this past season, only 11% of the time, the winning team scored under 20. Prior to week 18, that was 9%. Week 18 was a statistical anomaly.  How often does a team go into the red zone 6 times and come away with 13 points? Not often. GB did and we won that game. And we played a Jets team (0-7 at the time) that was offensively inept. Teams also don't consistently win one score games as often as we did either. Those things tend to balance themselves out the following year. I'm not erasing wins. I'm looking at how this team actually performed during the season. We defied the odds winning 2 games scoring under 20. The record, and the stats across the NFL, show we are in reality closer in performance to a 6 win team than we are to 8.    If Bryce was a FA for another team would we be looking at him? Probably not. He's in the retread and dice roll category. It just so happens we just signed him to the option. There's not a lot of good options out there right now. That's why I'm not in the sign a vet as QB2 club. Bring in a retread or dice roll. Trotting a vet out a couple of games isn't going to get us anywhere long term. 
    • Not sure he is in the top ten but: His 9.99 RAS score, second among 1,512 tackles since 1987, isn't a gimmick. You see every bit of that explosiveness translate to the field when he kicks and slides in pass sets. NFLDraftBuzz
×
×
  • Create New...