Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Lock in the Rams at -10 with every dollar you can spare


TheBigKat
 Share

Recommended Posts

10 hours ago, Shocker said:

Everyone in this world is picking LA which is why the Panthers will cover.  Seriously if that happens we know the fix is in.

I’m fully convinced, especially since sports betting apps became mainstream, the refs nudge the games. There are penalties on almost every play. They choose to call them or not. Who here thinks it’s a coincidence the 49ers first penalty of the game truly came in the third quarter on the Panthers extra point try? To conveniently keep the score difference to 8 points just past the -7.5 spread. 

I agree Panthers will cover. The game will be close for no apparent reason. 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, CRA said:

Do not do this.  This is the NFL.  Rams could easily just sleepwalk cross country and play down to an inferior team and still comfortably win by 7 (that isn't as close as the final score says) 

I had a quick look at the odds over here.

Spotting the Rams 10 only doubles your money. That's a hell of a gamble in the NFL. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would stay away from this game betting wise. It has the makings of being one of those weird games we actually play close in like Philly and KC last year. 
 

Team pissed off, back home, + Rams possibly overlooking us. Good chance Dave actually runs the ball this week. Not saying we will win at all but there could be a garbage time TD that makes it a 8-9 point game late in the 4th.

Rams don’t care about the spread, they want to get the win and go back home all the way across the country.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Basically agree.  He is the one of that bunch that offers upgraded pass catching along with he is supposed to be kind of special.   Then you have the OL and the ideas that if they perform you can have JAG backs and still do well. So okay we could be fine.  But Brooks is important and to me that receiving element sets him apart.  So there sure is something riding on him.     What strikes me as incongruent is people over in Atlanta or those that follow them look at Penix with a third surgery and act like it is no big deal.      And we are on pins and needles over Brooks.  Either they should worry a lot more or we should worry a lot less.  
    • I usually go a game or two optimist over the consensus here but this is too early for me to say. I need to see some players on the field.  I am not feeling real optimistic though.  
    • Okay as a ‘take CJ’ fan I actually don’t obsess over CJ and Houston, contrary to the narrative.  But I thought I picked up some noise that his OL left a lot to be desired.    Not a single Beyce supporter would judge him harshly if he had a crappy OL. We all know that.    So be fair about it.  A QB needs to be protected.  Especially a guy that gets to his spot and wants to finish the play from there. Which CJ is.  
×
×
  • Create New...