Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Official Week 15: Panthers @ Saints Gameday Thread


TheSpecialJuan
 Share

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, Navy_football said:

So yall just watched 2 amazing catches from nobodies on the Saints to bail Trough out, yet THAT was a bad throw by Bryce? Come on man. Like I keep trying to tell yall, our WRs and TEs are not good. Yet.

4 is a good WR, but he is soft. Both of those things can be true. He’s also got a problem consistently attacking the football. He needs to go get the MFer

  • Pie 1
  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, tukafan21 said:

100% should have caught that?

Honestly, what in the world are you smoking?!?!?!

The defender punched the ball the split second it touched his hands, there isn't a player in the history of the NFL that would have been "expected" to catch that.

You know sometimes it's okay to just say the defender made a great play on the ball.

Your dude drops a pass or two per game because he’s still a bit too soft. It’s okay he’s a rookie he will figure it out. Be objective bro, it’s okay. 

Edited by jb2288
  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Kuhndog94 said:

Shough getting bailed out by his receivers doesn't change the fact that Bryce threw that one a tad too short. 

The point is WRs make plays when they're targeted. If you only catch the ball when it's a perfect pass and you're wide open, then you're just a guy. TMac will tell you he should have brought that in.

  • Pie 2
  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, GoobyPls said:

Yes he does, the DB hit Tmac in the arms after he had the ball in possession 

The DB came in right as the ball got there and pulled TMacs hands down as he was adjusting his body to catch a ball BEHIND HIM. Shough throws that in a better position so *shrugs*

It's fine, Bryce is good in other ways, but that was bad ball placement. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, mrBdawg said:

It makes it hard but that’s what receivers like McMillan are for. Big strong possession receivers make those kind of contested catches.

Big strong receivers work by putting the ball in a spot for them to “go get it.”  Throwing it behind them when they’re sprinting the opposite direction is the complete antithesis of that.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • He can’t even learn to run routes. No chance in hell he can do both that and pick up blocking schemes 
    • Well he had essentially a 70% completion rate for almost three thousand yards.  Biggest issues were awkward and inconsistent release.  I wouldn't call arm strength bad, but not great.    
    • I see him being better and most of that is a few downfield passes that were seemingly non existent.    But it is what is around him that has dictated the trajectory more than the quarterbacking. He is game manager level and unable to dictate to defenses.  And even if I am wrong and he is the reason we ‘upwarded’, we are bumping our heads on the ceiling and only making meager gains. If it is an incline it is awfully shallow degree wise. Like a finance graph that tracks your progress and hovers around the rate of inflation. Barely breaking even.  Is that where you want your money?  We make up these deadlines expectations and generally he does the minimum of what he needs to do to hang around.    It does not encourage me to believe that when we get into a game against a good run d that we cannot break down with our run game, to believe that we can pivot to the air and successfully counter their strategy.  But they run it back again. Of course I am gunshy of a repeat of the same thing we have watched for three years.    oh, and yes his durability is his most impressive positive for my money. I fear the other shoe dropping on that and the contractual consequences that will follow.   Last  of all, too late to edit my mistake here but would like to acknowledge it: the last three years has done very little to convince me that I was not wrong in not wanting him. One too many “not”s. 
×
×
  • Create New...