Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Who thinks 100 yards 1TD and 2int after 3 years is the future? [OP is weird...54 yards, 1 INT, 2.3 YPA]


Panthers Fan 69
 Share

Recommended Posts

The narrative is that Young is not being given the support that he needs to develop properly.

So, he clearly needs a top 5 defense, the most expensive oline money can buy, pro bowl running back, all pro wrs, and a hof te. Additionally, coach needs to be a COY candidate.

If these simple needs cannot be satisfied, then Young will just not reach his potential, and that is 100% the fault of the team.

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 1
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, UnluckyforSome said:

The narrative is that Young is not being given the support that he needs to develop properly.

So, he clearly needs a top 5 defense, the most expensive oline money can buy, pro bowl running back, all pro wrs, and a hof te. Additionally, coach needs to be a COY candidate.

If these simple needs cannot be satisfied, then Young will just not reach his potential, and that is 100% the fault of the team.

Exactly. You know after 3 years what you have. All teams can really tell after a couple seasons max if you have the “it factor” or not. Bryce just had the biggest game of his career and put up less than 60 yards to go along with a terrible interception. 

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

35 minutes ago, UnluckyforSome said:

The narrative is that Young is not being given the support that he needs to develop properly.

So, he clearly needs a top 5 defense, the most expensive oline money can buy, pro bowl running back, all pro wrs, and a hof te. Additionally, coach needs to be a COY candidate.

If these simple needs cannot be satisfied, then Young will just not reach his potential, and that is 100% the fault of the team.

instead of trying to do all that wouldn't it make way more sense to simply get a better Qb ?

  • Pie 4
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

40 minutes ago, csx said:

I dont but why are you making up stats?

I see the exaggeration, but he's not far off. Bryce's mean game in yardage output was the second Saints game at 163. He's averaging just over 1 TD a game and an INT roughly every other game.

So a typical stretch of games from Bryce looks like--under 200 yards, with one passing TD (occasionally a second) and a pick every odd game.  Still not impressive, at all.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, WarPanthers89 said:

Exactly. You know after 3 years what you have. All teams can really tell after a couple seasons max if you have the “it factor” or not. Bryce just had the biggest game of his career and put up less than 60 yards to go along with a terrible interception. 

I would go a step further and say you know what you have after a QB has 6 losses on their record. If they can't meet the minimum standards after 6 losses, they need to ride the bench and develop. Keep them around for another shot IF the next QB racks up 6 losses and also fails, and you believe there's enough potential to develop them. After 12 losses, you have to move on from a QB if they can't demonstrate the minimum standards of a playoff caliber QB.

It's not difficult to see a playoff level franchise QB on a bad team. QBs should always elevate their offense and make their players look better than they actually are on Sundays. It's the opposite with the Panthers. The WRs and RBs are making Bryce look better than he actually is at this level.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I'd hold on to Walker - we have no OT depth at all. Freeling is a block of clay - all the tools are there and he appears to have a great attitude. He needs serious work on his technique to realise his potential though.
    • From my watch last night: They weren't trading out of 19 unless it was a daft offer once Freeling got there. They were clearly antsy to get Hunter - and Minnesota actually called to offer the trade down. They weren't trading out of the third round pick once Brazzell fell to it (and Canales would have been happy with him in the second round). They traded back a lot on Day 3 - even if Morgan 'Babe Ruth'd' it with Lee, Hecht and Wheatley; they clearly weren't the only guys they would have taken at those picks. I'm curious to know which player caused the reaction at the start of day 2 (Dan Morgan): "of course they'd pick him"
    • Watching this confirms that this staff and front office is super high on Monroe Freeling. I wouldn't be surprised if he's gotta a real chance to win the starting LT job in camp. If he does, we can look to flip Rasheed Walker to a contender desperate for tackle help.   As for Ickey I still really like him and wanna extend him but based on how the staff was talking about Freeling it might be time for ickey to start taking some practice sets at guard if he wants to stay here as we are gonna have to have figure out a solution for the contracts of Lewis and Hunt.  My preferred scenario for the Oline in 2027 is Freeling-Ickey-Hech-Lewis-Moton. 
×
×
  • Create New...