Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Dave doesn’t sound too thrilled with the prevent


Recommended Posts

I mean we have nothing at LB. We play zone because we don’t have developed pass rushers. 
 

If we come down with that second INT how many here are singing Evero’s praises?

I want to see us play more man coverage because Horn can do it. But we can’t play man if the front 4 can’t get home.

Edited by OneBadCat
  • Pie 1
  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, OneBadCat said:

I mean we have nothing at LB. We play zone because we don’t have developed pass rushers. 
 

If we come down with that second INT how many here are singing Evero’s praises?

I want to see us play more man coverage because Horn can do it. But we can’t play man if the front 4 can’t get home.

If there is an elite D-Lineman available in the 1st I wouldn't be mad at it, though I think we could improve at other positions much more.

Edited by PantherBoy95
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, OneBadCat said:

I mean we have nothing at LB. We play zone because we don’t have developed pass rushers. 
 

If we come down with that second INT how many here are singing Evero’s praises?

I want to see us play more man coverage because Horn can do it. But we can’t play man if front 4 can’t get home.

This guy gets it...

Whether we blitzed or didn't, I'm not sure I can recall more than a few plays where Stafford didn't have at least 5 seconds to throw the ball. I think we got pretty lucky that Stafford fuged his finger up - his passes were pretty inaccurate the rest of the game.

I'm not sure I can recall a worse pass rush in our history than last year's and this year's team. Like embarrassingly bad...

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, PleaseCutStewart said:

This guy gets it...

Whether we blitzed or didn't, I'm not sure I can recall more than a few plays where Stafford didn't have at least 5 seconds to throw the ball. I think we got pretty lucky that Stafford fuged his finger up - his passes were pretty inaccurate the rest of the game.

I'm not sure I can recall a worse pass rush in our history than last year's and this year's team. Like embarrassingly bad...

When you play prevent ans still get clocked for the go ahead td of 30 yards most would rather bring the house and have gone for broke

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, OneBadCat said:

I mean we have nothing at LB. We play zone because we don’t have developed pass rushers. 
 

If we come down with that second INT how many here are singing Evero’s praises?

I want to see us play more man coverage because Horn can do it. But we can’t play man if the front 4 can’t get home.

It's not even about zone vs man. Evero had our guys playing so far off the ball during that last drive, it gave Stafford and the receivers massive passing windows to exploit. I get playing safe with Jaycee hurt, but even if LA scores fast, we get the ball back with much more time left than 38 seconds 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Evero and Bryce have been shackles on Canales and Reich. Tepper hires coaches to make his choices look good instead of letting a HC/GM partnership align the team to make their system and philosophy work.

If Canales can win a division and compete with the best in the NFC, imagine what he can do if he gets the players he wants, the DC he wants and especially the QB room he wants. The only thing Canales has control of is offense and receivers.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, joeyxfresco said:

I like Dave as a HC but just like Rivera his loyalty to his friends will be his demise as a HC. We can do so much better at OC but he wants his buds Idzik along for the ride. DC may also need to speak up about wanting his own DC since Evero was forced on him. My only hesitation on letting Evero go is how well MJ has developed under him 

Evero is a puzzling case of the defense doing well enough to lull you into thinking he’s doing a good job and then with the game on the line in the biggest game of the season he coughs up the worst defensive play calls of the season. I think it’s time for a new voice on defense. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, ProcessBlue2 said:

I’m telling yall I think we hire Raheem Morris or Gus Bradley

I think Raheem Morris would be a great hire. Atlanta had a good defense this year. He should not have been fired in Atlanta. They won 4 straight to end the season.  They figured some things out late in the season and they’re gonna start all over again. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Oh, the high expectations after a draft. Keep your expectations low, people. Darin Gantt's latest "Ask The Old Guy" gives life to one of those lessons about pro football reality as a fan: "Rasheed Walker was a three-year starter at left tackle for the Packers, so Freeling is going to have to work. Hunter's got another big 'un in front of him in Bobby Brown III and a different kind of defensive tackle in Tershawn Wharton. Chris Brazzell II's got a lot of traffic at his position. Zakee Wheatley has to be better than the chronically underappreciated Nick Scott, and Sam Hecht is a fifth-round rookie at the hardest position on the line to play, who probably doesn't have immediate positional flexibility, and a solid free agent addition in Luke Fortner in front of him. "Fans generally love their draft class as soon as it arrives, because there is no evidence to the contrary yet. Once guys get on the field, the reality begins to creep in, and the seasoned among you remember that if you get three or four good players out of a draft, that was an amazing draft." https://www.panthers.com/news/ask-the-old-guy-things-looking-up-after-the-draft-monroe-freeling-luke-kuechly-bryce-young-derrick-brown Don't get crazy. Winning the draft (or the offseason BTW) on paper always leads to good feelings and great expectations, especially when you seemingly succeeded the season before, but let's remember that the Panthers are very much a work in progress. Team building takes time. If we get a couple of starters out of the draft, it's a good draft, but three or four would be an amazing draft, and anything more than that is actually sensational--even if entails a few multiple high end rotational players along with three starters. Moreover, kind of within that same vein, the coaches have to let the kids off the chain. Remember the coach-speak of past coaches about competition that is anything but because coaches have their notions about veteran experience? Not saying that they're necessarily wrong, but sometimes I think their reluctance to put the young guys out there is based somewhat in dogma or possibly fear because big stakes are on the line (e.g., their jobs). It can be frustrating to say the least, but the coaches are supposed to know best. Again, I say all of this so that we can remember to temper expectations and keep them within the realm of reality. It's like telling your mind to think of it as something akin to under-promising and over-delivering. Leave room to be pleasantly surprised for the best case scenario, but be cognizant that that rarely happens. I would think at this point, most of us should be able to recognize growth when we see it, and sometimes that growth doesn't manifest itself in the form of immediate supremacy, but a setting of the stage for long term dominance for years to come. It seems like we're on track for an emergence by 2028 or 2029. We still have huge questions, but by 2029, hopefully we will take our seat at the table of the perennial contenders in the NFL.  
    • You’re playing madden we’re talking real football stuff…. He does have you seen his special on internet he def thinks he’s getting paid 
    • Without the team having an identity kinda hard to predict what they value.  They either are really trying to build a balanced team, or preparing for another swing at qb if Bryce doesn’t pan out. Seems like we value the o line but the $ spent there has been underwhelming besides Lewis, you could say it’s because of injuries but still hasn’t been worth the investment. as already stated, the whole handling of Bryce young as a whole has been ass backwards, we spent the years we’re supposed to take advantage of having a qb with a lower cap hit, building the team up to be adequate. now It appears, key word appears, the saints have done it correctly, which is painful to even think about. Regardless, I hope the front office has paid attention to qb contracts recently, such as Tua, Kyler, Daniel jones(pre colts) and don’t settle for subpar qb play at franchise qb rates    
×
×
  • Create New...