Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

What does Gettleman need to do to make you optimistic for 2013?


Cyberjag

Recommended Posts

The draft is where you win or lose. Let's just see who he drafts and what impact they have. Its been a while since we even had two Rookie contribute there first year without injuries.

Amini at LG, Keuchly at OLB and MLB, Adams at PR, Norman played a lot before Gamble went down. Nortman was the starting Punter. I just listed players who would've got a ton of playing time with out injuries on here.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't know that he can do anything that'll make me optimistic about next season.

If he makes good decisions on the draft and free agency though, I might have reason for optimism the year after.

And since I know it won't happen this offseason, stealing a few people from the Giants front office a year from now would absolutely help my outlook for the future.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This article says we are roughly 11.8 million over the cap once the carry over money is figured in. If we use the numbers in this thread. Cutting Gamble, Ron Edwards and Nakumura get you even.

So even if we keep Williams, Gross and Beason but restructure the deals for a few million apiece we are sitting 6-8 million under the cap which covers your rookies. You cut Tolbert, cut Onatolu, restructure Godfrey, restructure Dwan Edwards and cut Armanti and you have 5 or 6 million more.

And who have we gotten rid of really?? I think we can cut Pickles and save a few million more. Yeah a rookie would be better or a minimum vet guy from another team. I don't see that cutting a lot of useless guys will keep us out of free agency or doom us to suck. We have had a number of guys who have seriously underperformed but got paid well for nothing.

http://www.derp/2013/1/27/3922826/the-salary-cap-situation

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Until he actually screws up, I am going to give Gettlemen my trust. He has a proven track record as a pro evaluater. Who is he going to trust to lead him through the draft? That is the only qualm I have.

The hiring of Gettlemen put us back on track. We have a football guy running our football team. Why not give him a chance to actually make a few decisions before we question his ability?

Yes there is going to be addition by subtraction for this team. However, I, and many others, just happen to believe that that bright future we all envisioned when we drafted Cam, has already started.

The team that played the last eight games last year can compete with anyone. If we can just keep improving. We should be just fine. Or even better, great.

Why not?

Also, the only hole this team truly has? RG. Any other position can be upgraded, but none can be thought of as holes. We may not have stars at every position. But the team that finished last year was very solid. If we have a solid draft, and do well in FA, there is no reason we cannot be good to great next year.

IMO, with Gettlemen helping him, Rivera is going to get us where we want to go. And I am giddy over that prospect.

Oh yeah, and GOOOOOOO CATS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why are the exact same scouts here ? Why has the scouting department not had bodies added ? If the idea is to build from the draft and supplement with FA why do we not heavily invest in scouting ?

He's driving now. His experience alone is good enough. Add the fact that he's there and its not Hurney. I for one feel reassured. Remember, scouts did their jobs, Hurney was the one pulling the trigger based on the information the scouts supplied. Who's to say that maybe the scouts gave him the right choices but Hurney picked the wrong player.

Could work both ways, I know. But from what I'm reading and hearing about Gettleman, he will be a lot more thorough with this process than Hurney.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am confused on how the cap works.

I thought if we trade a player, the new team inherits the remainder of the contract.

Also I thought the upcoming players that we draft this year, will not count towards the cap until the following year.

??????????

Simplified, if we sign a player for a 20 million dollar contract over 5 years, but pay him 10 of it in a signing bonus, the cap hit for the first year is 4 million and not 12 million, the bonus is pro-rated. But in year three, if we cut him, we absorb the 6 million he has remaining of the pro-rated bonus. There are other ways that the way a contract is structured can mess up your cap if you cut the player, but that's the easiest one to understand.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He's driving now. His experience alone is good enough. Add the fact that he's there and its not Hurney. I for one feel reassured. Remember, scouts did their jobs, Hurney was the one pulling the trigger based on the information the scouts supplied. Who's to say that maybe the scouts gave him the right choices but Hurney picked the wrong player.

Could work both ways, I know. But from what I'm reading and hearing about Gettleman, he will be a lot more thorough with this process than Hurney.

That good and fine, but you know what is better than a few good scouts ? A poo ton of good scouts.

One of you better tell Gentleman that he has no pressure to win in his first season.

That is pretty comical poo.

Your reading comprehension needs work my friend.

This team has issues, some pretty severe. People aren't giving up, but the future has more ? marks than many would like.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I would heavily push back on the notion of Tomlin and Cowher inheriting "collapsed teams." From 1980 to 1991(prior to Cowher and after their Super Bowl victories) the Steelers experienced just 4 sub .500 seasons. In fact the winning percentage for those years was 0.505. At most that was relatively mediocre, something fairly akin to the pre-Tepper Panthers. From Cowher through Tomlin(1992 to Present) it has been the NFL's best franchise. 22 playoff appearances, 4 Super Bowl Appearances, 2 Titles, 15 times winning the division. In fact they have only experienced 3 sub .500 records in that 34 season span.  That isn't ever a scenario where rebuilding happens. It's constant and consistent retooling so that your franchise floor is always high. It's smart business decisions, exceptional drafting and quality personnel moves that create a situation where that floor STAYS high.  It was precisely BECAUSE we opted to go through a complete teardown and "rebuild" without any of that competence being in the organization at all that led us to where we are currently. A situation that will more than likely continue for well over a decade longer.  Long term successful franchises do not "rebuild." They are in a constant state of competent flux that sustains them through some leaner periods without ripping the foundation completely out that led to that success in the first place. 
    • Houston's OL sucks but Stroud has also definitely regressed. Similar story to Jayden Daniels in Washington. Both guys looked like future MVPs as rookies but sustaining success in the NFL at QB is hard. The more tape there is on you for opposing DCs to study the harder it gets.
    • So I was curious and remember seeing a tweet but here are Young’s numbers vs Strouds number since that time  Stroud since week 3 2025. Bryce since coming back off the bench and playing in Denver 
×
×
  • Create New...