Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Trade Deadline is TODAY

MichaelNewtonII

By MichaelNewtonII,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

Peppers90 NC Community Regular

Peppers90 NC

Posted
Posted

seems to be some continuity and good chemistry going right now, to the point it could possibly be a mistake to tamper with it. i would love an upgrade, but i dont see it happening. i dont see Gordon being dealt at any cost, unless someone gave a first for him. the Browns used a second on him and he has proven to be worth it, why would they give him up for a draft pick? so they can just pick another wr? na, he stays in Cleveland. Fitz contract is crazy, so he stays and I'm pretty sure the Giants value Nicks, at least they did before the beginning of the season.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
CatMan72 Enthusiast

CatMan72

Posted
Posted

I could see Nicks simply because of the Giants connection we have in the F.O. 

 

Cards won't move Fitz now, will wait until the offseason... no reason to unload him now. 

 

Don't see us trading for Gordon, simply because he's had too many off-field problems for our tastes - Carruth still haunts us. 

 

I would also imagine the asking price is MUCH lower on Nicks right now, he's struggled this year and will be a FA after this year so there's only so much the Giants can expect anyone to give up for him. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Growl Grand Master

Growl

Posted
Posted

All this chatter the past few weeks about players being moved, etc. 

 

Nothing is going to happen - as usual. Maybe some reserve RB or OL gets dealt but nothing noteworthy. 

 

um what? players have been moved all over the league this year. it's becoming an increasingly growing part of building a team. well ran franchises aren't content to just sit put any more with "their guys" and lose games and smile because at least they didn't go and do anything "crazy,"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Joe Bear
      Okay, now face the facta guyd

      By Joe Bear · Posted

      No, it will be a raw 6'7" 17-year-old European who just played basketball for the first time in March and who the idiot GM "had first on our board." He'll play the whole G-League season, get in 42 games for the Hornets and average 1.1 ppg on 35% shooting. Been there, seen that.
    • ForJimmy
      JJ Jansen on tanking

      By ForJimmy · Posted

      We missed on Burns at his peak value. That’s the problem with trading for picks 2-3 years away (which people were convinced the Rams would suck by now and these would be higher picks btw). Each year away the pick is the further in value it drops. Fitt was clearly hired based on turning us around quickly. It’s one of the many reasons tanking isn’t really a thing as our player JJ is telling you in this original article. It would take the whole organization from the owners down admitting they aren’t winning soon with Burns and picks 2-3 years away having more value because that’s when we are still rebuilding. It would only make sense if Fitt had a longer leash and would more than likely be the ones making these picks anyway which you wouldn’t want. The question is would you rather have those Rams picks with the strong possibility of Fitt still being here or would you rather Fitt try to “win now” like he did and expedite his firing? Altering the timeline would affect more than just the Rams picks. 
    • HaricotVert
      Potential changes to playoff seeding

      By HaricotVert · Posted

      I dont buy the idea that it would create more competitive games Given this: Seed Current Format Record Proposed Open Seeding Record 1 Lions 15–2 Lions 15–2 2 Eagles 14–3 Eagles 14–3 3 Buccaneers 10–7 Vikings 14–3 4 Rams 10–7 Commanders 12–5 5 Vikings 14–3 Rams 10–7 6 Commanders 12–5 Buccaneers 10–7 7 Packers 11–6 Packers 11–6 That would mean Wild Card round would have been Eagles (14/3) v  Pack(11/6) Vikings(14/3) v Bucs(10/7) Commanders(12/5) v Rams(10/7) Instead of Eagles (14/3) v  Pack(11/6) Bucs(10/7) v Commanders(12/5) Rams(10/7) v Vikings(14/3) Then with the reseed it would mean that highest remaining seed would always draw the lowest remaining team.
×
×
  • Create New...