Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Hardy franchise tag and hurt the cap or FA DE signing...what you say?


Jmac

Recommended Posts

I know most folks on here doubt DG would use the tag on Hardy and dump 12 mill onto the cap......would you be willing to offer 10 or 10.5 mill a year,front loaded contract for three or four years (word is he turned down 8 mill a year) and cut or restructure to keep him or take the alternative...sign someone like Jared Allen as a FA for less (maybe has a couple years left). Thnk we have to many pressing needs on offense to do this in the draft. This may be Hardys last regular season game in the black and blue so this is a relevant question. Hate to seem him go to the black hole in Oakland.Can we get this done?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Is it better for a player to take 10 million and stay on a defense where he has the chance for his name to be on Sportscenter over and over and over because of his exploits gaining him tons of endorsements?  Or is it better for him to make 12 million and go to a team where he will struggle for the next 5 years because of the double teams and be out of sight/out of mind?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We will have from February to next season to talk about this.

People are so used to having nothing to talk about but offseason moves this time of year so I think it's mainly just habit. People are still in playoff denial. If we win 4 more games we are the Super Bowls champions, fug the offseason and salary cap haha

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Come on man 8 million a year still isnt enough...let him walk we cant hinder this team anymore than it already is by lucrative deals like the ones cj dwill and j stew got we need to think about the future cams deal is coming very soon

 

while we're at it why not let Cam and Keek walk, too?  Why hinder the team with lucrative deals?

 

cj's deal wasn't bad imo... we needed him

 

we need to pay our young stars, and hardy is one of them... but we're not gonna overpay him because DG doesn't seem to do that

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • okay I found this and it sounds like my hopes for the first surgery being not such a great job seems like it could be actual reality.  I only hoped because that would give a better chance for recovery and ia a possible scenario so I just thought it could be possible. Had no real evidence of it. But I’ll be damned.    This is a detailed report of Brooks’ surgery and the condition of his knee after the failed repair.     https://x.com/jmthrivept/status/2055743129408704806?s= Sparked by some very good questions by @CoachspeakIndex, here’s some info on Jonathon Brooks: 1. Speculation that the first graft/ACLR by Dr. Cooper didn’t “take” or at least was too lax, leading to failure and re-tear. Brooks dealt with issues cutting, progressing in his rehab into the early stages of 2024 and then re-tore it late 2024, requiring a second ACLR in January 2025 (essentially revision). Notably, CAR prolonged Brooks’ rehab process through Sept-Oct due to issues progressing into the next stages of rehab. 2. Second surgery performed by Dr. Neal ElAttrache, who has extensive experience with revisions. He did a double bundle technique, harvesting graft from Brooks’ left patellar tendon and a strip of his right IT Band (his right patellar tendon had been utilized for the prior graft in 2023. The double bundle technique significantly increases rotational stability of the knee, leading to a stronger and more secure graft/reconstruction. Also to note, Brooks’ surgery wasn’t significantly delayed, meaning that the tunnels from his prior ACLR were in good shape and they didn’t need to perform bone grafts to fill in (would have delayed 2nd surgery by 5-6 months). Essentially, reading the tea leaves tells me that everything else except for the graft itself was still in good quality within his knee. Good sign for future.  3. Typically, you see a performance increase anywhere from 16-20 months post-revision. Brooks will be ~21 months out from his second surgery by the time Week 1 hits. His knee should be more stable and stronger this time around, with adequate time for healing and return to all movement patterns. I’m not viewing this situation as a typical “Player __ had TWO ACL tears, he’s cooked” situation. Rather, I’m viewing it as the first procedure failed, but the second procedure is significantly stronger and should allow him to return to form this time around. I don’t know why it posted as a link but there it is.  
    • Jackie, any more reps tomorrow, or is that it for this session?  thanks for the work
    • How can you say they aren’t trying to win now with all the moves made in free agency? Or is trading first round picks the only way to be win now? I’d be fine never trading another first round pick again, win now be damned.
×
×
  • Create New...