Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Madden 16

DeeJay

By DeeJay,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

Rockahype Explorer

Rockahype

Posted
Posted

Not sure how JMF will get around EA's stranglehold on NFL licensing. If JMF can't use the actual NFL roster they might as well not even bother.

Agreed that if this is the case no one will care without real NFL rosters. I'd play a CFL Blitz 2016 if The Golden Calf of Bristol moved to Canada.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Mr Mojo Risin Mentor

Mr Mojo Risin

Posted
Posted

Me and my roommate play madden 15 on the 360 and we do a fantasy draft with all of the legends and play through the seasons. The game isn't that great and could definitely be better. It's like whoever designs it has 0 creativity and they only remove game modes instead of adding new ones (they removed online team play in this madden and I was so fuging pissed) I only play it because it is the only football game available. I really hope that 2K can make a decent football game because there basketball games suck

And yes I play with the Panthers every chance I get

Link to comment
Share on other sites
The Huddler Grand Master

The Huddler

Posted
Posted

And you guys are on drugs.

Madden 2005 is the greatest of all time. it was at the height of the competition between Madden and 2k. Both companies put out damn good games to out do the other. Ever since madden has gotton lazier and lazier.

Soeone tell me why all of my other games, call of duty, battlefield, gta, etc. Have like 50-60 gb of poo in their game but madden has only 15gb?? Its cause they are lazy and do the bare minimum. Its been so long since they put out a good game suckers dont even know they are playing a poor product. They could add SOO MUCH yet they dont.

fug madden. I am a sucker cause i love the panthers and it does in my football fix when i beat people with them

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Carl Spackler Grand Master

Carl Spackler

Posted
Posted

I've played 2 games online ever, both as the Panthers: one on Madden '10 where I beat someone using the Ravens 33-31 on a field goal after driving 65 yards in 20 seconds, and one on Madden '15 where I beat someone using the Bears 15-14 when I scored a TD with :05 left, went for two and hit KB on a slant for the dub.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Montsta Proficient

Montsta

Posted
Posted

This past years madden on Xbox one was actually a phenomenal game in my opinion. Yeah it had some of the classic madden hiccups, but I've been interested in it far longer than any other recent iteration of madden.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • MHS831
      Some homers' opinions of the OTs that we may realistically be able to get at 19

      By MHS831 · Posted

      You could say that-- but if we don't need a starting OT this year, why would you draft a flawed one that is not going to play? (We are coming from different underlying assumptions and perspectives--I see your argument and don't disagree with the premise) Your thinking is based on the assumption that an OT for the future is more important than immediate needs at other positions, or that we can meet other needs in later rounds even if we take the OT in round 1.  I do not think there is but 1 OT worthy of a first-round grade---they are mocked based on need and demand--if we do not have a need for a starter right now, a team at 18 may grab a T that is the 33rd best player--worth it if you have no starting T, but not if you have a starter.  So just because they are mocked around the middle of the first it does not mean that the players are good values--teams get desperate.  QBs are a great example.  Simpson may be worth it in round 1 for the Cardinals, but not the Jets, because they have Geno Smith.  Sure, they will need a QB by next year, but taking Simpson is a reach. I do not see our need, with 2 starters (Walker and Moton) and another possibly returning by the end of the season enough to justify ranking OT over positions like Safety, Will LB--I do not think we replaced A Shawn Robinson (We gonna put a NT out there?  Wharton (280lbs)?  So do we reach in round 1 for a player who may not play much or do we get a Will LB that can cover?  A deep free safety?  A quality center? A playmaking TE?  A DT to replace Robinson?  A wide receiver to balance the secondary?  Long term, if the right player was there, you would be right.  Short term, OT is a luxury at this point, in my view.  
    • strato
      Off-season topic: WWYD? Total Branding Redesign

      By strato · Posted

      Put Huey P Newton on the helmet. With his AK. 
    • csx
      Baldinger on the 2026 LB Class

      By csx · Posted

      We arent switching. Evero is 3-4 to the core. Given how 3-4 has been a noticeable characteristic of top defenses recently and we have drafted and signed players fir it  I dont know why anyone would think that's a good idea 
×
×
  • Create New...