Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

What Texans Fans Are Saying


Jeremy Igo
 Share

Recommended Posts

Well, week two is upon us. 

This week the 0-1 Texans come to Bank of America stadium to face the 1-0 Panthers. 

The Panthers fought through adversity and a tough defense in Jacksonville to pull off a 20-9 victory. The Texans were dominated at home by the Kansas City Chiefs. Don't let the final score fool you, the score was 27-9 into the 4th quarter. Slop time points make the result seem closer than it was. 

First of all, The Houston Texans organization week 1 OFFICIAL GAMEDAY THREAD  on their own website had 920 comments and 28,000 views. The Huddle week 1 OFFICIAL GAMEDAY THREAD  had 2,059 comments and 53,750 views. Apparently the Huddle doubles them up. 

Well what are they saying over there? 

Observe...

Wait... is this serious? 

giphy.gif

 

Someone should inform Charles Johnson, Thomas Davis, Shaq Thomson, Josh Norman, Bene Benwikere, KK Short, Mario Addison... yada yada 

But most of the time currently within the Texans fan base is discussing a quarterback controversy. They are trying to decide which quarterback, Brian Hoyer or Ryan Mallett, is less awful. 

 

Hidden Content

 

View full article

I agree with you on everything sans Shaq Thompson.  Shaq is way to unknown and for a long period last week was so non-existent that I didn't know he was even on the field.  That said, our defense will be fine against a Fosterless Texans team ran by either a Browns castoff or a cocaine addict.  Their defense could cause problems, but with how terribly they covered Kelce last weekend, unless they get their LB issue squared away, Olsen could break out which could make this a really bad weekend for the Texans.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here's the latest from this JamTex idiot. He thinks we only have 2 decent players- Cam on offense and Luke on D. As for Luke, I think it's most likely that he plays. 

"If Luke K is out for the Panthers defense, their defense is full of holes. 
The Panthers have no other real weapons. They are average at best without Luke.
Looks like he most likely won't be playing because of concussion protocols. 
Cam can't win it on his own, and the Texans are allot more to handle on both sides of the ball then the Jaguars."

 

Edited by caatfan
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

I agree with you on everything sans Shaq Thompson.  Shaq is way to unknown and for a long period last week was so non-existent that I didn't know he was even on the field.  That said, our defense will be fine against a Fosterless Texans team ran by either a Browns castoff or a cocaine addict.  Their defense could cause problems, but with how terribly they covered Kelce last weekend, unless they get their LB issue squared away, Olsen could break out which could make this a really bad weekend for the Texans.

that's because Shaq WAS non existent. He only played 17 snaps because of the personal that the Jags were using.  Shaq is a wild card, a utility knife. He's an asset.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Fwiw, only one guy said something really stupid.  Here was Texan fan response to him. 

I am always somewhat surprised by other fan's lack of general football knowledge, but then I must remember that that such ignorance is cherry-picked. 

Yeah, it is just one guy.  Here is what one of their fans said in response.

Im not sure how much you follow other teams, but the panthers have a very good defense. They may not be splashy and get a lot of airtime on espn, but look at their stats and you will see they have a defense that you need to worry about.

You said the same thing about the KC defense without knowing or checking and look what happened. Please do some research on teams before you break out the kool aid and pom poms proclaiming easy victories.

I'm pretty sure Luke will pass the concussion protocol and will play Sunday. If he does LOOK OUT! He's one of if not the best LB in the game right now, and even if he doesn't play that defense will still give you fits if you're not prepared

What are all of these "holes" their defense that you speak of?

 

Most of their fans seem fairly realistic, but I do think this will be a tough game for us. 

 

  • Pie 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Houston's D will be the toughest or 2nd toughest we face all year behind Seattle's. I expect Luke to pass the protocols and lead a turnover feast against a team that has 2 starting QBs, which in football math means they don't have 1, along with no Arian Foster and no Andre Johnson opposite DeAndre Hopkins. Texan fans will say WR Nate Washington had more yards (105) than Hopkins (98) so our secondary should watch out. Pffft. Josh, Bene, and Peanut ain't sweating that WR group.

Calling a defensive slugfest won by Gano. Gonna be a lot of conservative play-calling from Shula and that's the smart move. Game will hinge on which offense screws up less and takes better advantage of turnovers both defenses will give them. We can at least threaten in both running and passing. Who does Houston have at RB now? Exactly my point

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Oh, the high expectations after a draft. Keep your expectations low, people. Darin Gantt's latest "Ask The Old Guy" gives life to one of those lessons about pro football reality as a fan: "Rasheed Walker was a three-year starter at left tackle for the Packers, so Freeling is going to have to work. Hunter's got another big 'un in front of him in Bobby Brown III and a different kind of defensive tackle in Tershawn Wharton. Chris Brazzell II's got a lot of traffic at his position. Zakee Wheatley has to be better than the chronically underappreciated Nick Scott, and Sam Hecht is a fifth-round rookie at the hardest position on the line to play, who probably doesn't have immediate positional flexibility, and a solid free agent addition in Luke Fortner in front of him. "Fans generally love their draft class as soon as it arrives, because there is no evidence to the contrary yet. Once guys get on the field, the reality begins to creep in, and the seasoned among you remember that if you get three or four good players out of a draft, that was an amazing draft." https://www.panthers.com/news/ask-the-old-guy-things-looking-up-after-the-draft-monroe-freeling-luke-kuechly-bryce-young-derrick-brown Don't get crazy. Winning the draft (or the offseason BTW) on paper always leads to good feelings and great expectations, especially when you seemingly succeeded the season before, but let's remember that the Panthers are very much a work in progress. Team building takes time. If we get a couple of starters out of the draft, it's a good draft, but three or four would be an amazing draft, and anything more than that is actually sensational--even if entails a few multiple high end rotational players along with three starters. Moreover, kind of within that same vein, the coaches have to let the kids off the chain. Remember the coach-speak of past coaches about competition that is anything but because coaches have their notions about veteran experience? Not saying that they're necessarily wrong, but sometimes I think their reluctance to put the young guys out there is based somewhat in dogma or possibly fear because big stakes are on the line (e.g., their jobs). It can be frustrating to say the least, but the coaches are supposed to know best. Again, I say all of this so that we can remember to temper expectations and keep them within the realm of reality. It's like telling your mind to think of it as something akin to under-promising and over-delivering. Leave room to be pleasantly surprised for the best case scenario, but be cognizant that that rarely happens. I would think at this point, most of us should be able to recognize growth when we see it, and sometimes that growth doesn't manifest itself in the form of immediate supremacy, but a setting of the stage for long term dominance for years to come. It seems like we're on track for an emergence by 2028 or 2029. We still have huge questions, but by 2029, hopefully we will take our seat at the table of the perennial contenders in the NFL.  
    • You’re playing madden we’re talking real football stuff…. He does have you seen his special on internet he def thinks he’s getting paid 
    • Without the team having an identity kinda hard to predict what they value.  They either are really trying to build a balanced team, or preparing for another swing at qb if Bryce doesn’t pan out. Seems like we value the o line but the $ spent there has been underwhelming besides Lewis, you could say it’s because of injuries but still hasn’t been worth the investment. as already stated, the whole handling of Bryce young as a whole has been ass backwards, we spent the years we’re supposed to take advantage of having a qb with a lower cap hit, building the team up to be adequate. now It appears, key word appears, the saints have done it correctly, which is painful to even think about. Regardless, I hope the front office has paid attention to qb contracts recently, such as Tua, Kyler, Daniel jones(pre colts) and don’t settle for subpar qb play at franchise qb rates    
×
×
  • Create New...