Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Bucky Brooks might be going insane


Cary Kollins

Recommended Posts

I have learned this year that all of sports media are...ignorant. If a regular dude working at Home Depot messed up his job as much as these writers and personalities, they'd be fired. But this brooks guy who doesn't research can spew diarrhea out his mouth without research. A couple of cams ints were tipped passes off of his own guys hands. I can only recall one (Norwood Seattle game). 

 

Take that pick away he has 9 same has Ben. Would he say Ben is better than too? Probably not because he is clown shoes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's funny that in years past Bucky was one of the few sticking up for the Panthers when everyone else was questioning them. 

This makes me think Bucky has been assigned the job of taking the anti-Carolina point of view, for the sake of argument since everyone else is praising Carolina, Cam, etc...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've noticed that lately it seems he can't make up his mind about anything & stick to it so I've stopped reading/watching him. Because I was spending too much time trying to figure him out instead of hearing what he was saying. One time Cam is the greatest, the next time he's not. Multiple personalities disorder?

2 hours ago, Jangler said:

I still don't know who this person is.

And that's okay. :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't know that folks on TV even believe half of what they say.  I think they usual do for and against pieces with specific player comparisons. They are told whose side they are on and have to argue for that viewpoint. Otherwise much of what they say from week to week makes little sense.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, panthers55 said:

I don't know that folks on TV even believe half of what they say.  I think they usual do for and against pieces with specific player comparisons. They are told whose side they are on and have to argue for that viewpoint. Otherwise much of what they say from week to week makes little sense.

That's basically exactly how First Take works and I'm guessing something like that is what is going on here. Listening to two people agree with each other isn't really that interesting. They have to argue both sides for entertainment value.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


×
×
  • Create New...