Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Joe Person's Weddle Backpedal


top dawg

Recommended Posts

Joe Person seems to have gotten people all worked up a bit last week over the Panthers' interest in Eric Weddle and a possible signing for nothing. Now, his tune is not so optimistic.

"The Panthers, who were about $20 million below the cap as of Friday, could put together an attractive offer. But unless Weddle were to become a bargain, expect the Panthers to focus on other priorities."

Well no poo, Joe!

Looks like all the people who harbor some disdain for Person, saying that he simply speculates (akin to members on a message board), have been given the perfect example.

Now I don't mind speculation as long as it isn't passed off as insider knowledge. I am not even saying that Person explicitly stated that the Panthers were seriously considering adding Weddle to the roster (maybe it was all wishful thinking), but it seems like Person's article was the wind that gave rise to this seeming unsubstantiated rumor.

Well, I guess if nothing else it provided Panthers fans with a little excitement in this normally silent time of free agency that has become a hallmark of the Gettleman era.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Person is in the dark and it is intentional.  Any 45-year old man who spikes his hair with product (Probably has glitter in it) is probably unreliable.  I do not think he is in the know--in fact, I think he is deliberately kept out of the loop.  Jeremy may know more, but I can tell you as a person who (as a grad student with a degree in English and Journalism) worked weekends in the sports department at the Observer for a while, you know who had their hand on the pulse of their sport and their team.  Rick Bonnell was trusted by the Hornets and he knew stuff that he didn't report--you have to have a trust.  David Poole became that way with NASCAR.  I stay in touch with one well-known columnist there, and he rolls his eyes when you mention Person.

Go back to the "Pie Chart" presser with Richardson. A young, eager Darin Gantt was there.  Something had happened that violated his trust with the Panthers, and RIchardson was rather rude and condescending to him.  Gantt pushed on---a week later he was covering Volleyball for Winthrop.  That is when Person arrived.

I don't know if his hands are ties and lips sealed, but he is intentionally out of the loop.  I think Jeremy has said that he likes Person, but that is not the sentiment (according to my friend) at the Observer. 
 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Person is awful, but that's news to any Panther/Charlotte sports fans. 

I do believe though that the Panthers have always had a stranglehold/mafioso like approach to what gets said/published about their team, on a local level. Not saying it's right or wrong, just that the organization and The Observer have always been conservative. 

Never really seen too many question their moves or have an opinion that pisses into the Panthers wind. Even local sports radio is very tight-lipped about the Panthers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Person has definitely been more clickbait-y this offseason, though that could be the result of an edict from the Observer. 

"Here's a list of free agents the Panthers could target! (Linked with a picture of Bruce Irvin)" - "Panthers not likely to sign any big names."

"Panthers interested in Weddle!" - *Article contains nothing linking Panthers to Weddle*

"Dave Gettleman indicates the Panthers won't spend big on free agents" - While it's probably accurate that he won't, again the article is devoid of anything confirming the title. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, janderson20vt said:

Why do we even need Weddle anyway? Coleman played well for us. We need a SS and a corner.

You don't have many traditional SS/FS combos anymore, you need people who can cover these days, especially when you have a ton of speed at the LB position.

Again, I'm not stumping for Weddle here, but I do think that he could be very valuable to this team....guy has never played with this much talent in front of him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • We're in alignment regarding Thielen not being a game changer/breaker for the Panthers. Getting the ball into hands of playmakers like TMac and XL is going to open up things more than it is getting it to Thielen underneath (or letting him go after 50/50 balls 20yds downfield in his mid-30s). However, in a room where the other guys are two second year guys and two rookies, having a reliable vet that they can learn from is just as important as it is for the QB to have as a reliable third option. I can see that being worth $8.5M (just 3%) of the $279.2M cap... especially when looking at what's left out there: https://www.spotrac.com/nfl/free-agents/_/position/wr However, the idea that the team is forcing production to Thielen and leading to losses isn't supported by the data. Targets, not receiving yards, are how you can tell if a player is being "force fed." In the two games mentioned, let's look at the other players available... vs. TB 10 targets - Adam Thielen 9 targets - David Moore 8 targets - Tommy Tremble, Xavier Legette 3 targets - Jonathon Brooks 1 target - Dan Chisena, Feleipe Franks, Stephen Sullivan vs. PHI 11 targets - Adam Thielen 8 targets - Xavier Legette 5 targets - Chuba Hubbard, David Moore 2 targets - Tommy Tremble 1 target - Ja'Tavion Sanders, Deven Thompkins There isn't exactly a bounty of other names to throw the ball to. In those games, AT was one of the top 2 WRs. Diontae had been gone by that point.   So... yea. Agreed that Thielen isn't exactly carrying the team in his mid-30s, but it's undeniable that he was the most reliable target last season that still has quite a bit of value this season. Whether or not that value is reflected in a manner folks think on the contract is going to come down to personal taste. However, the idea that the team was forcing production to AT and that was the reason behind some losses couldn't be further from the truth.
    • I would also add that I think it's more than money.  AT has looked absolutely miserable out there at times, and there was a lot of speculation he would demand to be traded.  Personally, I thought he was a lock to be moved last year.  Maybe his hamstring is the only thing that prevents that from happening. The fact that he's not only willing to come back and play, but excited about it, really bodes well for Bryce.  AT is a veteran and he knows the game.  If he didn't have confidence in Bryce, I guarantee you he wouldn't be in a Panther uniform this year.  I'll take that as a positive.
×
×
  • Create New...