Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Teddy Williams or Sanchez to start next to Worley


panthers55

Recommended Posts

While I watched the game live without replay on Monday, it looked to me that Williams made a few good plays at corner. Let's not talk about the boneheaded play he made running into Ginn and causing a fumble. Still I didn't really notice Sanchez that much either way. Who is doing a better job and should start. And letd not go down the old, it doesn't really matter since both will get plays there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I beat this drum all offseason that not only should we have franchised Norman but if we weren't we should have brought in some vets so the backups starting due to injury would have been Bradbury and McClain instead of bringing guys off the practice squad that have no experience and expecting then to hold up against Brees on the road. 

Add to that we are bringing Horton from off the couch to play because our DEs suck. Who besides Gettleman didn't know we had problems at both positions???

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, CatMan72 said:

Ah, the days when we had Norman tagged and brought in Boykin to play the slot... I thought we had shored up the only real weakness we had.

Could you imagine if we had Norman, Bradberry, and Boykin as our starting corners? And drafted a DE in the 1st? fug man...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • He is a great guy but a horrible reporter. He makes my skin crawl when I hear his name. I heard that babies cry and dogs attack him when he enters a room. Other than that he is a good dude. Now go burn in hades u sum bit. 
    • The job just really passed him by. He came up when basically you just needed to get three or four quotes, toss a couple of team provided stats in there, and stretch it out to column length. you got your copy in by 330, out the door by 4, then chill/shmooze the rest of the day. If you were really good you got a book deal. Every now and then you got to write an editorial. The goal of the profession was like Peter King where ostensibly you’re a beat writer for whomever but you get paid to just shoot the poo. now it’s a 24 hour job, you’ve gotta be social media savvy, the pace has increased substantially, you’re expected to produce more than ever, you gotta be able to look through bullshit etc. there’s still risk of industry capture where you just become a mouth piece. Sheena Quick is obviously shameless. I don’t think Newton ever aspired to be more than an inoffensive beat writer, but even that relatively simple role was just more than he was cut out for. its even worse when you’re covering a team that expects the Fourth Estate to act as a PR extension, or considers them on par with buying Twitter bots to promote Bryce. there were over thirty papers that covered the panthers first training camp. In that environment there’s room for boring guys like newton, and they may even be incentivized to push the boundary a little. But today that just isn’t the case and most of the guys are hanging on until retirement (person, gantt) or they’re good and gonna be matched up like Jordan. im not defending the current state of sports journalism, just saying that what counts as a meat and potatoes beat writer passed newton by. He’s retiring well past his sell by date, but that’s pretty common for his generation in general. 
×
×
  • Create New...