Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

NFL Power Rankings, Are We Really a Top 10 Team?


Pantha-kun

Recommended Posts

NFL.com : #8

ESPN : #8

Yahoo : #7 

Bleeding Green Nation : #8

CBS Sports : #7

Bleacher Report : #5 

Walterfootball : #7

You think these rankings are justified? The last poll we averaged around the 10 spot and now we are averaging around the 7 spot , after a week where we didn't even play a game lol. I think its mostly because the Cheifs lost. The way things are trending if we manage to beat the Jets on Sunday and the Saints on Dec. 3rd, we should be a top 5 team no questions. 

As of right now though? I'm not sure. At least our victory against the Falcons is looking a bit more credible now that they're starting to string together wins .And the Lions are also starting to find a groove so they're both increasing our strength of schedule.  I'm not sure how much stock to take from beating the Dolphins, or even if we simularly blow out the Jets. I'd still have kept us around the 10 spot honestly, unless we beat the Saints and/or Vikings. If we win the next 3 games, then we should probably be right in line for the #2 seed and right below the Eagles in the power rankings. .But of course that's looking fairly far into the future . 

I guess looking at it from a positive light, we lost to Saints (top 5 team) , Eagles (Top 2 team) , and the Bears. So the only bad loss we had the entire season was against the Bears , and I'm willing to give pretty much every team not named the 07 Patriots or 72 Dolphins at least 1 game where they either have an off day, some weird poo happens , or they run into a team late in the season whos out of contention and treating the game like their super bowl.  

I'd say things are trending up but we've yet to face true tests in the 2nd half of the season. I think the Saints and Vikings are on a whole nother level. But at least the Redskins showed the Saints aren't immortal, and the Rams were doing pretty well against the Vikings until that Cooper Kupp fumble on the 1. And the Giants showed anything is possible with a hellacious defense .

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah the AFC is terrible, only teams in AFC that may be better than us are NE (who we beat) and PIT. NFC is stacked though.  I don't think we are as good as PHI or NO, MIN and LAR would be toss ups.  I think somewhere around 7 sounds right.  Two of our 3 losses were to the best teams in the NFL

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I’d put the following teams in front of us:

philly, New Orleans, Minnesota, Pittsburgh and New England. 

I’d have us at six, with the Falcons, Rams and Lions all right there with us.  I’d have the jags there too, but I can’t put a team with Blake Bortles as their qb in the same class as the other teams listed. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, Cary Kollins said:

We're one season out from 15-1 with the number one ranked defense and an offense that is getting healthier by the day.

No one wants to see Carolina in the playoffs, home or away.

Agree. I expect us to win the division and go for the 2 seed with a bye but I think we'd be a good bet to win any playoff game regardless of what seed we are. Most of the NFC playoff teams don't have the recent playoff experience we have... I see these 6 teams making the playoffs, no seeding order:

Panthers, Aints, Eagles, Vikings, Rams, Lions.

Brees and Payton obviously have playoff experience but the rest of the team hasn't been there in 4 years. Eagles have none. Vikings have essentially none--just the one Seattle game--and Keenum in particular if he's still playing will get rattled in the playoffs. Rams have none. Lions have just one game 3 years ago. 

 

Falcons or Seahawks could creep in there but I don't see it happening. Falcons' schedule is tough while the Lions' is a joke after this Vikings game (and they already beat them once in MN, could see them winning again at home). Seahawks are terrible without Sherman and Chancellor and aren't making it.

 

EDIT: Forgot the Lions made the playoffs last year... Got smoked by Seattle. So they're the most experience of the bunch with just 2 first round games in the past 4 years, both losses. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Camp Fodder said:

My whole issue is our starting receivers are funchess and shepherd. Along with clay and bersin. 3 of those would never see the field on most teams

True but getting back a healthy Olsen and keeping CMC and even Dickson involved in the passing game should provide some options as long as we can reestablish the run with CMC and Stew/CAP

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We're just as good as any team in the NFC and that was with a QB with a bad shoulder learning a new system. With what Cam and McCaffrey can do, getting back Olsen, and solid D play, barring any injuries we are just as good as any team in the NFL. The only way we lose is making mental mistakes. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Those were the days lol 
    • Have you even been reading my posts?  I'm not so sure because you seem to insinuate that I'm expecting some monster year 1 season, but I've time and time again said I'm only expecting 800 yards from him as a rookie.  Because like you said, it's not in his control, we have a bunch of good receiving options and two 1k yard RBs in what should be a run first offense. And yes, I'm very much a T-Mac homer, I've never once denied it, I'm an Arizona alumni who has been open about that from the very first thread I made about him over 18 months ago. But that doesn't mean I'm blindly expecting him to be an All Pro as a rookie, I just know more about his game than most people here who watch his highlights and breakdowns.  Which generally focus on the things he does best and worst to highlight his best abilities (his downfield contested catches) and where he needs to improve (separation) as those are the two things fans care most about when talking about the draft. What those breakdowns don't cover much are the "boring and mundane" things he does very well and exactly what you are talking about needing for Bryce.   He was constantly used in the short passing game, whether they be WR screens or quick slants, to get the ball in his hands and let him make plays, it's why he was 5th in the Big 12 in YAC last year.  With his size and hands, when he runs a quick 5 yard slant in front of the defender and the QB delivers the ball on time with anticipation, creating buckets of separation isn't needed, he's going to make the catch and then get some YAC for a 1st down.  Go watch the 30 minute YT videos that string together every catch he made last year (or the same thing from 2023) and you'll see those plays constantly, but in the analyst breakdowns leading into the draft those things don't get discussed as much as the big plays and then the things he needs to work on, because they're just not as "sexy" to talk about as those. Per your ask... He has 3 main things he needs to improve upon, and again, "needing to improve" doesn't mean "he's terrible" at them, just things he can get better at, like all young players have things to work on. 1.  His get off at the snap.   For all the amazing things he did for us at Arizona, this was always the thing that would frustrate me the most, as he generally was a bit slow to fire off the line.  The nice thing is even in the minimal clips we've seen from rookie mini camp, his initial fire off the line already appears to have been sped up a lot, he clearly has been working on that in the lead up to the draft. 2.  His separation Yea, he's not a 6' quick twitch athlete, so his separation is never going to be at the level of a Chase or Jefferson.  I've always admitted that, but because he's not one of those guys, he also brings a lot of things that those others can't.  His catch radius and hands are why I'm not as concerned about his separation, because he's so good at making those contested catches by snatching the ball away from his body to where the defender can't get to it to break it up. But yes, he does still need to get better here, just as all rookies have things to improve upon. 3.  Using his body more physically This is something that he did at times, but he also is just a great athlete for his size and would often rely on his physical abilities to make defenders miss him in the open field than just power through them, which is fine in college.  But yes, at the next level, as he gets older and stronger, I'd like to see him use it more like Evans does, and that will come with time as he builds strength and develops that part of his game. Again, I implore you to to spend an hour watching those "Every catch from the X season" for his last two years in college.  If/when you do, I think you're going to be very surprised by the number of times we used him in the short passing game and let him gain YAC to move the ball down the field.
×
×
  • Create New...