Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

My biggest issue with the 2018 team - the Front 4/Washington


CRA

Recommended Posts

 We currently have more sacks than literally 1 team in the NFL.   We aren't getting to the QB.  Our defensive line hasn't played up to what our team expects/expected.  Washington isn't scheming up ways to get to the QB.  Instead we just watch the front four almost get to the QB as they manage to make play after play on us. 

The DL is the biggest issue we have IMO.  It IMO actually has been an issue slowly building.  Hidden by better/more experienced DCs.  Our front 4 can't get the job done.  .  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I thought we did a pretty good job getting pressure starting in the second qtr.  Three sacks, including two by our defensive line,  and a few hurries.  That is why we held them to only field goals after the first flurry of points.  Also, there are actually 7 teams that have fewer sacks than we do, although that is not much better.

 

The more worrisome part is that most of our sacks have come in two games.  6 vs Dallas, 3 vs the Skins, 3 against the other teams that throw the ball more.  That has to improve for us to have even a ghost of a chance against the Aints or other pass happy teams.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Gotta blitz more.  Wilks blitzed too much, Washington not enough.  The difference this year being though, hopefully we now have two reliable corners to cover for the 2-3 seconds necessary in Bradberry and Jackson opposed to last year's mess of bad Bradberry and rotating players at CB2. 

Screw the zone.  If our CBs can't cover for 3 seconds while we bring 5 after the QB, doesn't matter.  Not to mention playing 5-10 yards off the WR allows short passes to pick us apart every...single...year. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Addison is gonna get cut next year if he doesn't step up. IIRC we save like $6 Million if we cut him next year.


ETA I just looked it up. We'd save $7.25 Mil. He GONE folks. Better start looking at first round DEs. I guess we're saving Haynes for next year? lol...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, iamhubby1 said:

 

    Rabble, rabble, rabble.

 

    As long as teams continue to get the ball out in under 3 seconds. We, and almost any team, will struggle to get home. Context people.

And that brings another issue up.  If other teams are able to get the ball out that fast against us then maybe we need to change up our scheme.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree that the pass rush has been, at best, inconsistent this year.  However them only having more sacks than 1 team misleading due to the fact most teams haven't had their bye week yet.  We actually are 17th in Sack % - not great, but not that bad.  I thought we were getting good push against the Redskins - Smith just did a very good job getting the ball out and they had a good offensive game-plan coming in.  But they really didn't do much against us in the second half.  Nothing substantial anyway.

I could see our sack numbers getting a lot better over the next couple of weeks considering our opponents.  Eagles for example have not held up very well in protection this season.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, Bronn said:

Addison is gonna get cut next year if he doesn't step up. IIRC we save like $6 Million if we cut him next year.


ETA I just looked it up. We'd save $7.25 Mil. He GONE folks. Better start looking at first round DEs. I guess we're saving Haynes for next year? lol...

Mario has been doing just fine. He and Poe have been dealing with the most double teams from what I have noticed. (I don't have numbers but it is something I pay attention to when I re-watch the games)

Kawann Short is the biggest issue with the line right now. He has been getting practically no push on the inside and he isn't even being double teamed. Qb's have been able to step up into a clean pocket against us far to often which is why our ends are having trouble getting to the QB. I am not even looking for Short to get sacks. He just needs to create any kind of pressure and help collapse the pocket. If our ends are getting boxed out and the QB tries to step up into the pocket Short should be in his face.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 hours ago, CRA said:

 We currently have more sacks than literally 1 team in the NFL.   We aren't getting to the QB.  Our defensive line hasn't played up to what our team expects/expected.  Washington isn't scheming up ways to get to the QB.  Instead we just watch the front four almost get to the QB as they manage to make play after play on us. 

The DL is the biggest issue we have IMO.  It IMO actually has been an issue slowly building.  Hidden by better/more experienced DCs.  Our front 4 can't get the job done.  .  

Sorry to point this out but we are 1 of 4 or 5 teams to have there bye so far.  So just number of sacks don't tell the story.  So far this team has had 3 games where they have gotten at least good pressure (Dallas, Skins, Cinny) and 2 with really no pressure ( NY, Falcons).  We actually did a really good job of pressuring Smith in the last game.  Washing seems to learn more toward McDermott's type of defense with a lot more zone blitz or just 4 down rushing as opposed to Wilks,  blitz every other play.  It theory it should lead to better coverage on the back end but it has not so far.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think it's ben pretty clear the front 4 aren't generating enough pressure.  We'll have a rotation during games with Horton and Addison on the outside that gets us virtually zilch.  Peppers can't go these days as a 3-Down lineman, Addison is a speed rusher, Horton isn't that great.  Obada is the closest thing but we are just average.  

More than anything else though, I'm just becoming tired of our defensive scheme.  Given Rivera is a defensive coach, this should be our top quality.  If we don't make a deep run, I say hit refresh.  Even in the case we go to the NFCCG.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Not sure who said it first, but Tepper is the correct answer. Still, I'm gonna go with Kasay keeping it inbounds. If, you subscribe to the butterfly effect version of time travel consequences.... When we win SBXXXVIII everybody's lives change: Moose never breaks his leg, We win it all again in 05. Tommy Jone is unknown and Peppers stays home, Champs once more 2008. No artificial pig heart turning JR into a creepy weirdo, no lockout, no Clausen. Fox and Jake ride off into the sunset on their own terms. No 2-14, no #1 pick. But, no laptop, no Blinn, 3 years behind The Golden Calf of Bristol, we still get Cam. JR let's him grow his locs like he always wanted, Smitty sees Cam in a new light. Dreads swinging, (and Smitty with his 3 Lombardis behind him) Cam is old enough to get those calls. No Manning narrative, Cotchery TD, PI against Talib on Philly Brown, 10,000 RTP calls and Kony Ealy SB50 MVP. No Jeans Fridays, no Tepper. KB doesn't slip on his own meatsweat mid-route in SD, Cam becomes the 1st QB to win 10 straight SBs. Retiring after being elected 47th president of the US of A, Cam ushers in the Permanent Proletarian Revolution across the globe, Xi Jinping bows in awe. "ẄøŘƙƐṛ§ őF ŧĤə ŵØRłð, ŮŊÏŦƐ!!!"
    • Yeah your right the owner was copping hand shandies while all this was going down 
    • I mean not surprised the Patriots took him in and aren't trying to push him out. They've been the most morally bankrupt team in the NFL for a long while. Wouldn't be surprised if Vrabel has his own dirt on Kraft/Brady and other assholes from that organization over the last couple decades. 
×
×
  • Create New...