Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Do You Think We Can Patch Up Both Oline and Dline Before 2019 Starts?


Hoenheim

Recommended Posts

I'm looking at this roster and we have very serious questions all over both sides of the line. 

Oline our Center is gone, we dont have a long term answer at LG, we dont have a true LT , Trai Turner hasn't been as good recently. The only position I feel is good is RT with Williams and Moton both being excellent at the position. So thats at least 3 O-line positions we need to fill.

Dline is even more of a mess. Mario has been consistently good the past couple of seasons but he's 31 and not a long term solution to DE. Peppers is old and a rotational player at best. We dont really know what we have with Obada, its a mystery. So essentially we have no long term answers at DE.  At DT, KK is 30 heading into next season and has been declining in play. Poe is terrible, Butler is terrible, and Love isnt a long term answer. 

How exactly did we get into a situation where both sides of our lines are in aging shambles? It seems that we're so lacking in good young talent on both sides its going to take multiple years to repair/rebuild them. Do you think that somehow they could both be in good enough shape to compete next year? And if so how would you go about accomplishing it? What FAs would you sign and who would you draft? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Unfortunately our lines are a multi year fix. If we draft smart we can add a Center, DE, DT and SS who will either start or play significant minutes. FA can add OG, OLine depth and DT. But we have so many holes it is not going to happen in one season.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Hoenheim said:

How exactly did we get into a situation where both sides of our lines are in aging shambles?

The answer to this question is only useful in as much as it keeps you from making the same mistakes again. It doesn't really matter which GM made what move (although I fear that is much of what the discussion will be).

3 minutes ago, Hoenheim said:

Do you think that somehow they could both be in good enough shape to compete next year?

Looking at strong OLines like Dallas from a few years ago, Indy, LAR, it seems they took multiple offseasons to build. I think we made a good start with Moton, and maybe Williams depending on his health. I'd prefer GVR, and Larsen to be depth.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

33 minutes ago, Hoenheim said:

 

How exactly did we get into a situation where both sides of our lines are in aging shambles? 

By wasting high draft picks on awful defensive lineman. Butler, Hall, Kony Ealy are all awful.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If both Tackle positions are indeed solidified, then next year is feasible. Quality Guards aren't as difficult to find in FA. Just don't settle for complete scrub projects like Amini. In my opinion, a highly rated Center should be targeted in this year's draft, along with depth in the later rounds. Just stick to Big 12 and SEC linemen.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • So Willis had a good game against a poor defense and all of a sudden he is worth 50 million and is guaranteed to be better than Young. LOL I know he looked good in the 3 games he started, and I think he will have success long term, but anyone signing him up for a long term contract for 50 million is taking a huge risk. 
    • Is he really though? Rivera was past his prime and probably shouldn't have even started 2019 so his firing wasn't really unexpected or unwarranted. Rhule lasted two and a half years which was about one year too long in my opinion. Bringing him back that third year certainly wasn't impulsive and I would say Tepper was more patient than he should have been. Wilks finished out that third season and did pretty good but most everyone could see he really wasn't anything more than an intern HC. Bringing him back was not the long term answer so not bringing him back was the correct call. Hiring Reich was a mistake from the beginning and he recognized that fairly quickly. I am sure he knew he was going to catch a lot of sh*t for firing him so quickly ( and boy did he ) but it was absolutely the right thing to do given everything that was going on. The firing may have looked impulsive, but I think it was him recognizing he had royally f*ck up and just dealt with it instead of letting it fester.  That brings us to Canales. 2025 was only his second season and yet he delivered 8 wins and the NFC South title. And while that might not sound great, given the lack of talent and cap space they started with, it's a strong step in the right direction. I couldn't imagine Tepper not being pleased with their progress given the crap the Panthers' have been though under his ownership.
×
×
  • Create New...