Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Bumped into Jim Schwartz the other day


Ja  Rhule

Recommended Posts

Had a nice chat with him about Eagles vs. Panthers game last season.  He said Norv Turner completely changed the game plan mid game and he had no idea how to stop the Panthers offense.  Said it took him completely by surprise.  Overall, Jim was extremely nice and he did not hesitate to talk football.  He had nothing but nice things to say about the Panthers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

33 minutes ago, CBDellinger said:

Norv is an incredible offensive mind. We are lucky to have him in Carolina.  

Agree... and I truly believe Ron is a great defensive mind.  Just has had struggles with clock management- I hope this new coach we hired for that purpose helps.

Along with Ron focusing on defense and letting Norv run the offense without interference

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 hours ago, Captain Morgan said:

so maybe Ron sees Norv's ability to flex and says maybe I need to abandon the Ditka defense and start becoming more flexible by adding a 3-4 element.

 

What is a Ditka defense? Ditka was a HOF TE and a head coach who's DC (Ryan) did exactly what you are suggesting.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, Seltzer said:

Agree... and I truly believe Ron is a great defensive mind.  Just has had struggles with clock management- I hope this new coach we hired for that purpose helps.

Along with Ron focusing on defense and letting Norv run the offense without interference

I absolutely think Rivera is a great defensive coach. It's why I'm so baffled that he let Washington completely tank our D for so long. I admire the hell out of loyalty, but damn...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, LinvilleGorge said:

 I admire the hell out of loyalty, but damn...

There's your answer.

Rivera has cited Andy Reid as telling him not to give up on people on his staff. And while I get the rationale, you've got to be wise in the way that you apply it. I wouldn't say there's much evidence that Rivera has been that so far (definitely not when it came to Shula).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am hopeful that the other coaching changes will make a difference for us long term.  Norv is great on his side of the ball.  RR is a great DC. He has some limitations as a head coach. But I still support him.  But adding the new Wr coach and most importantly the new secondary coach Fewell will pay dividends.  We are not gonna make it to the Super Bowl and and be a consistent winner by having to pick up aging vets for positions simply because we can’t develop players.  

And to the point of this OP, I am actually pretty excited that if we can keep Cam upright, Norv is just so nuanced that he will have this offense clicking this year.  If Olsen can stay healthy. And Moore and Samuel can take another step forward it can be a dynamic offense. I think the biggest jump in production will be from Samuel. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

53 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

There's your answer.

Rivera has cited Andy Reid as telling him not to give up on people on his staff. And while I get the rationale, you've got to be wise in the way that you apply it. I wouldn't say there's much evidence that Rivera has been that so far (definitely not when it came to Shula).

 And his failure to recognize and do something about the calls on defense is exactly when i lost faith in RR as a HC. It’s one thing to not fix the offense. That’s never been his thing. Horrible decisions nonetheless. But if I(and many) can see it from my couch, you better believe coaches did. 

  No CB is going to be effective playing outside leverage, 10 yards off the ball, with no safety help in the middle. This was routine. The long pass/PI to Alshon that almost beat us at Philly. Explain that coverage. He should have took over then. 

  You know I defended him(well his record mainly) up until the DEF fell apart. That’s his baby. And not encouraged by going “hybrid” in a ultimatum year. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

58 minutes ago, Black&BlueBubba said:

I am hopeful that the other coaching changes will make a difference for us long term.  Norv is great on his side of the ball.  RR is a great DC. He has some limitations as a head coach. But I still support him.  But adding the new Wr coach and most importantly the new secondary coach Fewell will pay dividends.  We are not gonna make it to the Super Bowl and and be a consistent winner by having to pick up aging vets for positions simply because we can’t develop players.  

And to the point of this OP, I am actually pretty excited that if we can keep Cam upright, Norv is just so nuanced that he will have this offense clicking this year.  If Olsen can stay healthy. And Moore and Samuel can take another step forward it can be a dynamic offense. I think the biggest jump in production will be from Samuel. 

I seriously question whether Norv Turner is going to be here "long term".

Norv's ideal scenario is likely to coach a few more years and then pass the job to Scott.

Mind you, Scott might turn out to be a talented OC in his own right, but he's not going to be his dad, at least not starting out. One of the reasons Norv is as good as he is is because he's been around forever and he's pretty much seen it all. There's no substitute for what that kind of experience gives you.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I thought he had a few really nice flashes.  I can see him showing out this year 
    • I have heard that before--when standing in front of a full body mirror at Old Navy.  I said it, actually. Seriously, Let's go on what we know. There is reason for optimism that exceeds random opinions and negativity: 1. Last year, the offense was the priority and the interior offensive line was the focal point. Morgan addressed it in free agency and the draft. They improved.  2.  Last year, Canales pulled Young after 2 games and replaced him with an established veteran.  Instead of giving up on Young, he developed him, primarily focusing on his footwork and timing.  Continued development in his fundamentals should result in improved play.  (this is significant because some athletes rely on natural ability and do not adapt well.  They resort to old habits. This means that Bryce is "teachable" and is willing to face adversity and fight through it.  That is what you want in a QB.) 3. Morgan drafted a raw talent at WR; and we all knew he was raw.  Huddlers are already calling it a bust, but his productivity numbers were in line with the other WRs drafted around where he was drafted.  So, yes, he was a bit disappointing, but what part of "Raw" is not understood here?  Evil Bryce, then inconsistent Dalton, then good Bryce--all while facing the top defensive backs--and let's not forget about his lingering injuries--and we should understand XL's productivity.  Morgan was looking for a home run based on XL's 1-season productivity and his freakish athleticism, but I always thought we would not know what we have until year 2.  TMac alone will make XL better--a solid #2. 4.  If you blame Morgan for drafting XL, you must give him credit for making Coker a priority free agent.  In my view, he addressed WR in 2024 pretty effectively in the long view.  5.  Let's look at the rest of the draft.  Brooks?  The best RB in the draft in round 2?  Morgan was attempting to build a solid run game behind Bryce.  Wallace was a very solid third round pick at LB. Sanders is a strong TE for a fourth round pick. 6.  Not much is being said about the development of Chau Smith-Wade.  His improvement mirrors Bryce Young's, actually.  In his first 8 games, his PFF rating was 36.5.  In the final 9 games, his PFF rating was 66.7.   7.  With so many needs, Morgan hit the UDFA market with success. In addition to Coker, Demani Richardson got 400+ snaps and had a 60.1 PFF grade, including an interception. 8.  In free agency, Morgan spent big bucks on Guards, a move that made his QB better. He added David Moore, Nijman,  He signed Clowney, Wonnum, Robinson, Jewel, Chaisson, Fuller, Scott, D. Jackson, Dionte Johnson, etc.  A few years of Fitterer left him with more holes that players.  Some did not work out, but he did all this on a budget (after he splurged on Lewis and Hunt).  It is hard to get a free agent to come to a team that loses--so in some cases, Morgan had to overpay or accept questionable players. Morgan's first year as a GM demonstrated an understanding of the game like we have not seen since Polian, before his lost it. Canales, on the other hand, should be rated by the improvement of players.  Zavala, Ekwonu, Mays, Young, Smith-Wade, Coker, Wallace--all improved.  He had to overcome major losses such as D. Brown, Shaq, Dionte Johnson, Corbett--and we saw growth.  Despite all this team went through, after 8 games of disarray, This team finished 4-5 with close losses to both Super Bowl teams.  Frankly, I do not know how he did it. This year was better.  The WR room is solid with depth.  The OL room is solid with depth.  The TE room is as good as it has been in a while.  The RB room has the potential to be as good as it was when we had 28 and 34.  DBs?  Better.  DL?  Better.  Edge?  better.  The bottom of the roster?  Much better. We really don't know what we have yet, and that makes this offseason exciting.      
    • Here you go. 2 yards. Bryce Sneak.mp4
×
×
  • Create New...