Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Nasir Adderley please..


Sub Zero

Recommended Posts

been on this train for a while, yall hop aboard too, the more the merrier 

not a popular opinion, but barring some of the top de being at 16, i would like to trade back and draft adderly, and address de in 2nd, or like i said before if he's not drafted by day 2, trade to move up and grab him 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If he is your guy you take him at 16. I want the guy with our second but he probably won't be there.

Best scenario if we had to get him... we would trade back to say 23-27 and pick up another 2nd rounder. I just went to firstpick as a reference to see how that would play out and traded back with the Colts. Using Hurney logic ... Came away with this. 

Your Picks:

Round 1 Pick 26 (IND): Kaleb McGary, OT/OG, Washington (A-)

Round 2 Pick 2 (IND): Nasir Adderley, CB/FS, Delaware (B)

Round 2 Pick 27 (IND): Chase Winovich, DE, Michigan (A)

Round 3 Pick 13: Miles Sanders, RB, Penn St. (A-)

Round 3 Pick 25 (IND): Christian Miller, OLB, Alabama (A-)

Round 3 Pick 36 (COMP): Will Grier, QB, West Virginia (A)

Round 4 Pick 13: Renell Wren, DT, Arizona St. (A+)

Round 5 Pick 16: Jordan Brailford, DE, Oklahoma St. (A)

Round 6 Pick 14: Kendall Sheffield, CB, Ohio St. (A+)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Actionman0z said:

Best case scenario is that nobody we liked at 16 is still there, there is a log jam at the top, and someone who wants a QB comes up with us to get one, and we don't make the price too high, move back, collect another pick or 2, and draft whoever you want. 

Right us picking just in front of the giants could help us with that. If they pass on QB at 6 other QBS needy teams we’ll see us as the spot to grab their guy before the giants can. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Need to do more research on NA to see if I like him more than Thornhill. Thornhill is more of a Eddie Jackson FS tweener that can play SS too imo. He’s bigger and I’m assuming stronger with 21 reps. Agree with that guy that Adderley isn’t a scared to come up and hit but more of a pure FS to me

im happy with either at 47

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • No. Physical tools alone aren't enough. There are plenty of examples of draft busts to support that. Aost all of them had the physical tools and that wasn't enough. But Bryce is a perfect example of the opposite. Absolutely elite intangibles aren't enough either. If you simply don't have the physical abilities all the football intelligence and work ethic in the world won't be enough to overcome it. Just look to the sidelines every Sunday. We call those people "coaches".
    • As much as I despise Billy B, his philosophy on QBs is how I would approach things if I were a GM. You always keep looking for your next starter.  He has Bledsoe, who got injured and his backup ended up being the GOAT. Even while he had that going, he kept getting his next guy and developing them. When Brady got hurt, Cassel stepped in and went 11-5 and they missed the wild card by dumb luck. Who knows how far they would have gone if they had gotten in. Jimmy Gs career started in NE. There were others, but he always kept looking.  You can't be afraid to keep looking for your next starter, but it looks like we're afraid to look for more than a marginal one. If you're going to offer a $25m contract with incentives, that screams marginal QB. It also screams you're just a transition until we find our guy. After a 10 or 11 win season, he's not accepting that offer. And then you're in a Daniel Jones situation. Do you pay for a year of success and pray it wasn't a one year wonder?  To this point, Bryce has really produced nothing, yet for whatever reason, our FO has not even sniffed at the idea that we need a real QB room with real QBs. Dalton was never starter potential, Plummer was a joke. KP certainly isn't, neither is Grier.  Our approach to the QB room needs to be one of strength not fear. Bring in guys who can compete or who you think can compete. This is THE elite position, in an elite sport, paid premium salary, where production matters. Either you produce or you can lose your job. It's not mean, it's just the reality of the position.  And I'm really just tired of our candy ass approach to it. 
    • If you plug Bryce onto the Pro Bowl roster you might have a chance to compete for a SB. If he's surrounded by top tier talent with a top tier defense on the other side, a field flipping punter, and a kicker good from 60+ you might have a chance. But that means you basically have to recreate Saban's Bama in the NFL and that's impossible... and Bryce couldn't win a championship in that environment either. What the Panthers didn't realize when they got so obsessed with his "PG mentality" was that what they were looking st was a "barely checks the box PG". The basketball equivalent of Bryce would be an undersized PG with marginal athleticism who can make the basic plays but adds nothing to the team in terms of elevating the overall team. Not a great shooter, not a great defender, not a great driver. Just a guy who can basically get you into the offense and be a matador on defense. Basically a placeholder while you look to upgrade the PG position. 
×
×
  • Create New...