Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Remember when NBC Sunday Football was good?


PanthersATL

Recommended Posts

I actually like Dan Patrick and Tony Dungy on the pregame. Al Michaels is fine but ive never been a huge fan of Collinsworth. It would be great when Greg retires if he took Collinsworth's spot but i doubt that would happen. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Sasquatch said:

That wasn't NBC

No, but it was the national broadcast. MNF used to be the nationally-televised network game and cable networks ESPN, TNT) came into the fold later, with SNF and MNF swapping channels for the 2006 season. Guess it's worked out well enough for the NFL.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't know that Sunday Night Football has ever been all that good.  Back in the Gifford/Cosell/Meredith days of MNF, it was an event.  It was a huge prime-time show.  Of course, there were three major networks and each market had a couple of independent channels back then.

SNF has never approached that status, and in fairness maybe never could.  Now, with MNF, SNF, TNF, endless cable channels, and equally endless streaming options, all three prime-time games are shadows of what MNF was in its hey-day.  The Sporting News ran a story last December on MNF that called it "Monopoly to Monotony."

I think the problems now are that the prime-time game production errs on the side of entertainment over football, almost like WWE without a scripted outcome.  Then you add that the league has often managed to make the game borderline unwatchable despite the increase in physical talent on the field.  I thought they recognized the error in their ways when they redefined a catch from something that took two physicists and a mechanical engineer ten minutes to sort out using HD slo-mo replays to something that could be reasonably well called on the field, but I am not so sure anymore.

Some writer said two years ago that if the league wanted to improve its product, the first step would be to get rid of the Competition Committee.  I can not argue with that. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, Pup McBarky said:

Yes, I do. It was best when it was on Monday night, called Monday Night Football, and had Dandy Don and Howard Cosell. Those were the days.

Gruden was good, maybe the best. 

It would be great for Romo to move to Sunday Night Football so we can get rid of the monotonous Chris Collinsworth. His voice and time in the box has run it's course; he sounds bored and I get bored watching the game because of his overall lack of enthusiasm. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I'm going to be real, the reason that vote ended up so lop-sided by the end was directly due to my programming. So there's nothing tongue in cheek about it. Also I left PFF after the Collinsworth acquisition (didn't want to move to Cincy) but have stayed involved in analytics via backdoor channels, but I can absolutely say that the experience was eye-opening, not because those guys are unquestionable football savants and that I became one by proxy, but because the amount of information that becomes available outside of what the typical fan has access to is revelatory and also really drives home how much context is still being missed even with all of that information. You don't discover that you know everything, you discover how much you still can't know no matter how hard you try, hence my point about the NFL not being able to figure out what makes a QB good. There's a lot of AI work going into that now and even that only seems to further confuse things vs. actually enlighten the problem. In the professional realm teams don't really talk about quarterbacks as A strictly being better than B, but how A can potentially perform better than B given a specific context of C. Of course those contexts may be wider for A than B, but there's also contexts where B can outshine A, even with lesser talent surrounding them. So what good teams strive to do is ultimately define a process of how they want their entire team to operate under schematically, find players that fit that scheme, and hopefully find a guy whose skillset will be maximized running that scheme with those players. Where bad teams fall of the wagon is constantly shifting those schemes and chasing bad fits or fads vs. sticking with a core identity and developing it.
    • there is a 100 mile long list of NFL players and coaches going to bat and defending horrible play from teammates.   
    • In 6 games, we've only had 6 hurries??? ... that can't be accurate
×
×
  • Create New...