Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

We've never had this luxury


RumHam

Recommended Posts

51 minutes ago, Peppers90 NC said:

Looked awfully slow in pursuit on that td run

You could see him realize the LB wasn’t in position as it’s happening.  He was already in pursuit just couldn’t compensate for Norris’ bad play.

Im no Boston homer, but I made note of that play b/c I knew he’d get lit up for it here.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, Davidson Deac II said:

From what I heard today, this is actually becoming a trend across the NFL.  Nothing to gained from playing the starters in the first preseason game.

Bears played about half their starters

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, hepcat said:

Bears played about half their starters

It was encouraging that our clear second string players were able to compete with anything the Bears put on the field.  That speaks well to the depth and competition we have on our roster.  I'm still concerned about FS however.  I know it's still early for Boston to look good, but until he does, I'll continue to be concerned.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, L-TownCat said:

You could see him realize the LB wasn’t in position as it’s happening.  He was already in pursuit just couldn’t compensate for Norris’ bad play.

Im no Boston homer, but I made note of that play b/c I knew he’d get lit up for it here.

That’s what I thought when I saw the replay. It looked as though he assumed someone else would make the play and once he realized that assumption was wrong it was too late. Hopefully he gets that out of his system quickly. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 hours ago, joemac said:

Yes. Let’s go. I wanna see the defense with all our good players in. Could be quite nasty.

I still think there will be some growing pains as we move to the 3-4.    I think we should be good though.  Maybe great.  But I think it will be a process. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 hours ago, L-TownCat said:

You could see him realize the LB wasn’t in position as it’s happening.  He was already in pursuit just couldn’t compensate for Norris’ bad play.

Im no Boston homer, but I made note of that play b/c I knew he’d get lit up for it here.

Norris crashed the gap like he was supposed to and actually forced the run outside where Montgomery ran towards Haynes, who did not seal the edge. He then ran a great line in pursuit of Haynes instead of the ballcarrier. Norris was nowhere near Boston the entire play. 

The play was DEFINITELY Hayne's fault, but it's another good example of the poor angles that Tre takes to get to ball carriers. 

Source:

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Seriously? A CB who missed all that time on his rookie deal and was also a top 10 pick when the guys picked right before and after have been studs. A RB our GMs tried to replace with FAs and 2nd rounders and two backup level players is one of the best drafts we’ve ever had? I’d argue that the 2011/2012 drafts were better even with just Cam and Luke/Norman. Here’s the drafts I think were better: 2017, maybe 2018, 2015, 2013, 2011, 2012, 2008, 2007, 2001, 2002 (just Pepp) I’m hoping 2025 is way better as well. Honestly, we’ve kind of sucked at drafting overall and that’s the only reason you can even remotely call Horn, Hubbard, Tremble and BC a good draft let alone one of our best ever. Good teams that draft well would laugh at that as a great draft. If you want to look at say the 2023 Lions draft, you’d get 4 stud/above average/average starters not just 3 replaceable starters/backups and a top 10 pick that missed half his games. That’s a draft that helps turn a team into a playoff team. Our record since our 2021 draft is 19-49. A best ever draft doesn’t go 19-49.
    • I remember when football was great.    Wasn't this century.  
    • Bingo. You can't pay that type of player elite franchise QB money. That average starter type player can excel when he's surrounded by top shelf talent in a great offensive system but pay him elite QB money and you're going to really struggle to surround him with the type of talent you need to carry him. You pay those elite franchise QBs because they can carry your roster. You can't pay guys who have to be carried. Bryce showed glimpses down the stretch last year. I really hope he keeps building on that. But before we back up the Brinks truck he needs to show that he's the type of QB who can lift up and carry the offense because when you pay those guys that's what they're gonna have to do.
×
×
  • Create New...