Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

NFL Fans Required to Wear Masks


Anybodyhome

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, jerrya said:

Not that big of a sacrifice to keep people safe!

and it ain't like we haven't done it before.  Only our great grandparents also put on a damn 3 piece suit to go along w/ their mask to watch a game. 

College_Football_Fans_Wearing_Masks.jpeg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, 45catfan said:

Will food and beverages (soft drinks and alcohol) be served?  If so, that could be interesting.

If I had to bet, I would say that food and drink will only be permitted in defined areas near the concessions. No food or drink in the seats. People will just use it as an excuse to take off their mask. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, CRA said:

and it ain't like we haven't done it before.  Only our great grandparents also put on a damn 3 piece suit to go along w/ their mask to watch a game. 

College_Football_Fans_Wearing_Masks.jpeg

If they required a 3 piece suit, I would fuging never go to a game again. They can suck my dick on that one.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, bull123 said:

Why would anybody want to go to a stadium for a game?

Money grab by NFL. 
 

No stadium experience, season ticket owners forced to sit in foreign seats with ‘comparable market value’ (yeah right), they don’t get to choose the game you go to, no concessions, no beer, risk getting corona, probably god awful lines...

The NFL is salvaging all they can to make a profit but have to skate that thin line of liability (and stupidity).

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Comparing a random stat to another rookie QB has nothing to do with the current subject.  Tom Brady had a 6.0 YPA his rookie year.  I hope you're not using one stat to define success of a QB? It's not a problem to want him to do better based on where he was drafted although I still contend it doesn't matter after the fact.  It doesn't matter if we're talking about Cam Newton, Tom Brady, Russel Wilson or any other QB.  It makes little difference once you're in the NFL.  Nobody gets a ring for where they were drafted.   Higher draft picks will get a little more time in most cases as teams want to make sure they've exhausted all avenues before they admit a draft pick can't play.  Other teams might pick them up thinking it wasn't the player but the organization and/or other coaches that caused the player not to succeed.  It's people's expectations that are wrong.  If we could go back and redo all the draft and put guys in the correct draft spot based on how well they played in the NFL, that would be nice.  Then your argument would make some sense.  People assume that where a player was drafted is a statement on how good that player is when the reality is there is a lot more luck than skill in drafting. If Coker turns into a pro bowl receiver and XL becomes a bust nobody cares except fans and the media. What we really should say is it's not too much to expect a player who has started at QB for a team over the last 2 years to be better than he currently shows.   Don't compare 1st round picks.  Compare starting QB's in the NFL.
    • They’re gonna have to go up against a real offense before any kind of judgement can be made of them.  Tlaw looks like damaged goods, Kyler is completely washed, and Penix….well…. they look better compared to last season but that’s what you’d expect with a healthy brown and horn.  I haven’t seen anything that indicates they’ll be considered an overall good defense when the dust has settled. 2002 it is not. 
×
×
  • Create New...