Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Tepper talks layoffs and the reasons behind them.


Jeremy Igo

Recommended Posts

I doubt any laid off personnel would say it was good for them in this jobs market climate. 

 

Nothing for them to do? Maybe see that as an opportunity to train them to do something else. Do what it takes to keep good people around until this all clears up. 

 

Unless, of course, he wanted to get rid of them anyways because thats what he wanted to do. Which is fine, it is his team. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It’s a business who cares.

I don’t like his answers though. He’s trying too hard to defend himself. He owns the business and can do what he wants. A, ‘tough business decisions had to be made’, would have sufficed. Now he just looks like a jackass.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Maybe the government can step in and appoint some bureaucrats to boards of private companies to stop this from happening in the future. No single person should have so much power over so many individuals. Tax the man and take possession of what he has paid for, lest the next American Revolution take place.

For real though, what he is saying that it isn't good for a person to have nothing to advance themselves with as an individual for two years. Surely he could essentially employ someone and play the role of government and pay their unemployment through a regular paycheck or he could allow, begrudgingly, to seek out their own path. 

Of course everyone would rather sit and do nothing as he proposed most of those laid off would be doing. I suppose that is the Leftist way though. UBI, here we come...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • He's handing off play calling duties to fuging Brad Idzik as well so, either that mouth breather can run the playbook and Canales can grow as an all around head coach or it will be a horrible decision and both of them and BY can screw off. I'm fine with that as long as it isn't just another excuse for BY to get another year with another coach worthy of working around his limitations as a qb. 
    • Not only for Andersen but the whole team, having not beat the Habs this season before tonite.  Shows them that they aren't jinxed.
    • I understand why people say things like it could be worse in relation to Tepper but it just doesn't jive for me. Are the optics bad? Yes. Would I want her to be the owner of my team? No. But I mean she's only been owner for a year and the Colts overall are a better run organization. As far as I know they've also never had the distinction of having the worst win percentage in all of professional sports either. Tepper has owned this team for 8 years and about the only thing that has been consistent has been the ability to continue to find different ways to achieve new lows. Even now people are saying things are different yada yada but we said these same things at certain points under Rhule Fitterer and Reich. I'm going to wait to see how the rubber meets the road this upcoming season before I make any strong conclusions about anything in relation to the longevity under this franchise going forward.
×
×
  • Create New...