Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Tepper talks layoffs and the reasons behind them.


Jeremy Igo

Recommended Posts

I doubt any laid off personnel would say it was good for them in this jobs market climate. 

 

Nothing for them to do? Maybe see that as an opportunity to train them to do something else. Do what it takes to keep good people around until this all clears up. 

 

Unless, of course, he wanted to get rid of them anyways because thats what he wanted to do. Which is fine, it is his team. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It’s a business who cares.

I don’t like his answers though. He’s trying too hard to defend himself. He owns the business and can do what he wants. A, ‘tough business decisions had to be made’, would have sufficed. Now he just looks like a jackass.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Maybe the government can step in and appoint some bureaucrats to boards of private companies to stop this from happening in the future. No single person should have so much power over so many individuals. Tax the man and take possession of what he has paid for, lest the next American Revolution take place.

For real though, what he is saying that it isn't good for a person to have nothing to advance themselves with as an individual for two years. Surely he could essentially employ someone and play the role of government and pay their unemployment through a regular paycheck or he could allow, begrudgingly, to seek out their own path. 

Of course everyone would rather sit and do nothing as he proposed most of those laid off would be doing. I suppose that is the Leftist way though. UBI, here we come...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Them playing behind a couple more seasoned guys until they get familiar with coverage and pace of play is a good thing though. We really can use them to spell the other guys, and in situational ball especially with Ransom on possible run/blitzing downs.
    • They fuged him over so bad to help cover their bad judgement. About time he got a little something to wrk with. 
    • I think completion percentage is a bit of a overinflated stat for a qb too. People place to much stock into it. So many factors to consider with it : receivers, how many attempts are made deep, the defense etc all play a roll in it. When it’s considerably low 50% or less the QB accuracy can come into question. But I don’t think it’s necessarily one of the better percentages to put so much importance into for that position. General effectiveness is far more indicative of the QB you have. First downs, 3rd and 4th down conversions, points scored and clutch plays IMO is how you grade a QB. Always bothered the poo out of me how people downed Cam for his completion percentage and that’s what they used to disregard him as an all time great. Dude damn near averaged 3tds to 1 turnover a game and was an obvious difference maker for us.
×
×
  • Create New...