Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Jeremy Chinn observations from watching coach's film


Jeremy Igo

Recommended Posts

Just finished up watching the coach's film of NFL game pass and kept a close eye on #21 Jeremy Chinn on all the defensive snaps. 

I have some observations.

He lined up at OLB and played a hell of a game there. His feet are constantly moving and shuffling, kid is never flat footed. He has really good closing speed and tackling is top notch. 

The only issue I saw at all was he was pretty easily knocked around in the power running game of the Raiders. He was still able to recover and have impact on the play, just not as much as if he wasn't initially pushed back. I suspect when this kid puts 10 pounds of muscle on he is going to be what we always hoped Shaq Thompson would be. 

Honestly, he was the most impressive rookie on the field Sunday. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

High upside, I'm just not sure we will play him at his best spot. I would love to see him take Boston's spot. Keep him away from the LOS and give him more coverage responsibilities. Or use 3 safety sets. The guy can cover Riggs and we want him playing a devalued LBer spot to get eaten in run blocks and put on 10 more pounds to slow him down so he can't cover WRs? Meh

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He was like a little pinball when those OL would get to the second level, but his athleticism was incredible. I can't wait until his technique gets crisper and the scheme becomes second nature to him. They even tried to pick on him once or twice to no avail.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A bit more weight and muscle mass from a year in an NFL program and he'll be even better. He's impressive now, but he also is still adjusting to the NFL game and the NFL players, each of whom are the equivalent of the best player on most teams he faced in college. There's a lot he's going to learn about angles, impacts and rolling with the punches this season.

If he can keep that motor and dedication and pair it with some experience, those Thomas Davis comparisons will be right on the mark. He's definitely got some serious potential.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

59 minutes ago, Waldo said:

I would love to see him take Boston's spot. Keep him away from the LOS and give him more coverage responsibilities. 

There's a reason Simmons was so coveted.

WLB is basically a nickel now. Yes it does weaken from the traditional WLB but having a that can constantly stay in and cover the TEs, HBs and Slot guys like a safety while having two safeties still.

Considering it was his first game coming from a small school he held up really well in the run game.

We do need to upgrade from Boston, absolutely,  but he's a solid starter contrary to Huddle belief and a good Role Player for now. We couldn't fill all our holes in a year and we could do a lot worse than Boston.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Rags said:

There's a reason Simmons was so coveted.

WLB is basically a nickel now. Yes it does weaken from the traditional WLB but having a that can constantly stay in and cover the TEs, HBs and Slot guys like a safety while having two safeties still.

Considering it was his first game coming from a small school he held up really well in the run game.

We do need to upgrade from Boston, absolutely,  but he's a solid starter contrary to Huddle belief and a good Role Player for now. We couldn't fill all our holes in a year and we could do a lot worse than Boston.

I don't see the value of a WLB that can play some safety being more than a safety that can play WLB and CB in the modern area. And Shaq was a spectacular matchup failure in that role the last few years. He wasn't good because he was a LB playing in the nickle where Chinn is perfect now just how he is.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Waldo said:

I don't see the value of a WLB that can play some safety being more than a safety that can play WLB and CB in the modern area. And Shaq was a spectacular matchup failure in that role the last few years. He wasn't good because he was a LB playing in the nickle where Chinn is perfect now just how he is.

Because if you don't have to sub as much, its harder for the offense to catch on and react. You have more of an element of surprise. 

If you look at players like James and Adams as top shelf, S+ tier examples of this, they can play anywhere, in the box, rush the passer, even deep. Look at Adams hotspots from Sunday they're fuging nuts. Matt Ryan noted how difficult it was to keep track of what he was doing. 

Go down a tier or two and you get more of a Chinn. No one is expecting him to be like the S tiers. Put him somewhere where he can do what he's best at and gifted for. Basically playing Buffalo Nickel, he's listed as a WLB but doesn't have to sub out. If he was listed as safety it'd be be basically the same thing, covering the slot, contributing on the run, occasionally blitz. He's still gonna be playing weakside more often than not, and giving the offense one less tell.

Sure I'd like to see Chinn tested deep more, but I'm not gonna sweat it right now. He looked good, even above expectations in his debut. If he keeps this up I'd like to see him with more responsiblities.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I thought he had a few really nice flashes.  I can see him showing out this year 
    • I have heard that before--when standing in front of a full body mirror at Old Navy.  I said it, actually. Seriously, Let's go on what we know. There is reason for optimism that exceeds random opinions and negativity: 1. Last year, the offense was the priority and the interior offensive line was the focal point. Morgan addressed it in free agency and the draft. They improved.  2.  Last year, Canales pulled Young after 2 games and replaced him with an established veteran.  Instead of giving up on Young, he developed him, primarily focusing on his footwork and timing.  Continued development in his fundamentals should result in improved play.  (this is significant because some athletes rely on natural ability and do not adapt well.  They resort to old habits. This means that Bryce is "teachable" and is willing to face adversity and fight through it.  That is what you want in a QB.) 3. Morgan drafted a raw talent at WR; and we all knew he was raw.  Huddlers are already calling it a bust, but his productivity numbers were in line with the other WRs drafted around where he was drafted.  So, yes, he was a bit disappointing, but what part of "Raw" is not understood here?  Evil Bryce, then inconsistent Dalton, then good Bryce--all while facing the top defensive backs--and let's not forget about his lingering injuries--and we should understand XL's productivity.  Morgan was looking for a home run based on XL's 1-season productivity and his freakish athleticism, but I always thought we would not know what we have until year 2.  TMac alone will make XL better--a solid #2. 4.  If you blame Morgan for drafting XL, you must give him credit for making Coker a priority free agent.  In my view, he addressed WR in 2024 pretty effectively in the long view.  5.  Let's look at the rest of the draft.  Brooks?  The best RB in the draft in round 2?  Morgan was attempting to build a solid run game behind Bryce.  Wallace was a very solid third round pick at LB. Sanders is a strong TE for a fourth round pick. 6.  Not much is being said about the development of Chau Smith-Wade.  His improvement mirrors Bryce Young's, actually.  In his first 8 games, his PFF rating was 36.5.  In the final 9 games, his PFF rating was 66.7.   7.  With so many needs, Morgan hit the UDFA market with success. In addition to Coker, Demani Richardson got 400+ snaps and had a 60.1 PFF grade, including an interception. 8.  In free agency, Morgan spent big bucks on Guards, a move that made his QB better. He added David Moore, Nijman,  He signed Clowney, Wonnum, Robinson, Jewel, Chaisson, Fuller, Scott, D. Jackson, Dionte Johnson, etc.  A few years of Fitterer left him with more holes that players.  Some did not work out, but he did all this on a budget (after he splurged on Lewis and Hunt).  It is hard to get a free agent to come to a team that loses--so in some cases, Morgan had to overpay or accept questionable players. Morgan's first year as a GM demonstrated an understanding of the game like we have not seen since Polian, before his lost it. Canales, on the other hand, should be rated by the improvement of players.  Zavala, Ekwonu, Mays, Young, Smith-Wade, Coker, Wallace--all improved.  He had to overcome major losses such as D. Brown, Shaq, Dionte Johnson, Corbett--and we saw growth.  Despite all this team went through, after 8 games of disarray, This team finished 4-5 with close losses to both Super Bowl teams.  Frankly, I do not know how he did it. This year was better.  The WR room is solid with depth.  The OL room is solid with depth.  The TE room is as good as it has been in a while.  The RB room has the potential to be as good as it was when we had 28 and 34.  DBs?  Better.  DL?  Better.  Edge?  better.  The bottom of the roster?  Much better. We really don't know what we have yet, and that makes this offseason exciting.      
    • Here you go. 2 yards. Bryce Sneak.mp4
×
×
  • Create New...