Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Bucks or Saints for the Super Bowl


CanadianCat

Bucks or Saints..   

62 members have voted

  1. 1. If you had to pick, who would you rather see win the Super Bowl

    • Bucks
      57
    • Saints
      5


Recommended Posts

I don't even really hate the Bucs that much for a division rival. I hate the Aints and Falcons wayyyy more. But I also don't like Brady or when teams build these super teams and try to buy a Super Bowl like Denver did, etc. And Arians is a total douche. There's nothing really likeable about this Bucs team at all. I don't see either of them winning it or even coming all that close, but if I was forced to pick I'd still say Bucs. Aints can go fug themselves and enjoy cap hell next year with Taylor Hillsom at QB.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, Captain Morgan said:

I can't imagine anyone saying they'd rather see the Saints have success.  Bucs have been irrelevant for a decade or more.  Nobody hates them.  All of a sudden they get a shot to be good for a year or two and we hate them more than the Saints?

lol

Yeah but Panthers fans have hated Brady for decades, so it kind of makes sense.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

fug the Saints. Honestly I can't say I have a problem with the Buc's other than them being a division rival. Hell, I won't lie, depending on who they face if they make it to the Super Bowl, I'd likely pick them as a team to go for, something that I can't say I'd do for our other division rivals. Oh man, I just had a thought. Imagine the hype around the Super Bowl if Tom Brady and the Buc's made it and they faced off with Cam and the Patriots (assuming they can somehow overcome how poor their WR core is right now and recover from injuries elsewhere).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I hate Brees, Wilson, Brady, and some other people.

As much as I want Atlanta to be our rivals, I think New Orleans is that team--at least to me.  So I would let the Bucs buy their championship and pay the costs for years following.

And would that not piss Winston off?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Fortunately only 1 of them can even go to the Super Bowl and the Pats are likely out of it. Which means we won't get another terrible SB like Pats-Falcons where I loathe both teams. Even if Bucs or Aints make it I really can't see them winning against the Chiefs/Steelers/Ravens or whoever comes out of the AFC.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • And that makes you right. 
    • Mel Kiper said he would retire if Jimmy Clausen wasn't a successful NFL starter too. Just because the experts make a claim doesnt mean it's true either.  Bryce may be a serviceable QB for someone. Serviceable QBs don't bring you a perennial winner or lead you to the playoffs over and over. Serviceable QBs also dont get 50m plus per year deals which is what a Bryce extension would look like.  The stats show he hasn't been even a serviceable QB in the 3 years he's been here. The eye test shows he hasn't put together 2 franchise QB salary games back to back in 3 years.  Complain all you want about people being negative, but people pointing out that Bryce is held to a different standard than anyone else on the team isn't complaining. It's stating the obvious. 
    • We have big bodied WRs and 3 TEs who all have potential and each bring something different to the table. I never saw the need to go out there and try and find a new starting TE.  While it's nice to have a guy like McBride, Bowers, etc, I think a team's better use of the cap is by having TEs on rookie contracts or cheap vets, not having to pay elite TE money.
×
×
  • Create New...